Literature DB >> 26911973

Hard-on-Hard Bearings Are Associated With Increased Noise Generation in Young Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty.

Denis Nam1,2, Toby Barrack3, Staci R Johnson3, Ryan M Nunley3, Robert L Barrack3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient-perceived noise from prostheses after total hip arthroplasty (THA) does occur, yet questions remain including the overall frequency of this finding, demographic and prosthesis-related factors, and the association of noise generation with patient-reported outcomes. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the frequency with which patients report noise coming from the hip after THA; (2) to identify patient and prosthesis-related factors associated with noise generation; and (3) to ascertain if noise generation is associated with pain or functional impairment after THA.
METHODS: A five-center study was designed to quantify the degree of residual symptoms and functional deficits in patients undergoing THA. Three centers were academic practices, whereas two centers were private practices that provided training programs for orthopaedic residents and fellows. Each contributing surgeon was fellowship-trained and specialized in joint replacement. Inclusion criteria for this study were (1) men between 18 and 60 years old and women between 18 and 55 years old; (2) patients requiring primary hip surgery as a result of noninflammatory arthritis such as osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis, or avascular necrosis; (3) a UCLA activity score of 6 or more before they were limited by pain; and (4) patients who had undergone a primary THA within 1 to 4 years before the start of the study and had a minimum of 1 year of clinical followup. Attempts were made to contact all identified patients meeting these inclusion criteria. Data were collected by an independent, third-party survey center blinded to the implant design and bearing surface used who administered questionnaires about residual symptoms, function, and pre- and postoperative activity levels using previously published survey instruments. Patients were specifically queried regarding perceived noise from their THA. We retrospectively identified 1242 eligible patients. Of the 1242 patients, 105 were found to have exclusions during the screening section of the questionnaire: postoperative infection (six THAs), fracture (two), dislocation (seven), or revision (17); limited activity level because of an operation on the opposite hip (34); and premorbid UCLA score of less than 6 (39). In addition, 128 individuals refused to participate, 156 were never available, 108 were not found as a result of a bad address/phone number, 48 were contacted but did not complete the interview, nine had died, and six had a language barrier. This left 682 of the 1137 eligible patients with completed surveys (60% response rate). The mean age was 50 ± 8 years at the time of surgery with 63% being men, and they were contacted at a mean of 3 ± 1 years postoperatively. Bearing surfaces (femoral head-acetabular liner) included 210 (31%) metal-on-metal, 144 (21%) ceramic-on-ceramic, 142 (21%) ceramic-on-polyethylene, 141 (21%) cobalt-chromium-on-polyethylene, and 44 (6%) oxidized zirconium-on-polyethylene. Differences in baseline demographic variables were accounted for using multiple logistic regression statistical analyses. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to determine the association of noise generation with residual symptoms.
RESULTS: Overall, 9% (61 of 682; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7-11) of young patients undergoing primary THA reported noise generation. Females (12% [30 of 251 patients]) were noted to have an increased likelihood of reporting noise versus males (7% [30 of 431 patients]; odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1; p = 0.03). After controlling for potential confounding variables including female sex and length of followup, patients receiving a ceramic-on-ceramic or metal-on-metal bearing surface (14% [50 of 355]) reported an increased frequency of grinding, popping, and clicking in the 30 days before survey administration versus those receiving a polyethylene liner with a ceramic, oxidized zirconium, or cobalt-chromium femoral head (3% [10 of 327 patients]; odds ratio, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.7-11.5; p < 0.001). Noise generation was associated with increased pain (r = 0.23, p < 0.001) and stiffness (r = 0.22, p < 0.001) after THA.
CONCLUSIONS: When interviewed by an independent third party, patients receiving a metal-on-metal or ceramic-on-ceramic bearing reported a higher frequency of noise generation versus patients receiving a polyethylene liner after THA. Young patients undergoing THA should be counseled that noise generation could be associated with increased pain after THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26911973      PMCID: PMC5014800          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4759-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  34 in total

1.  "Asymptomatic" pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: prevalence and metal ion study.

Authors:  Young-Min Kwon; Simon J Ostlere; Peter McLardy-Smith; Nicholas A Athanasou; Harinderjit S Gill; David W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the Journal.

Authors:  Jack E Fincham
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Midterm Outcomes of the Recently FDA Approved Ceramic on Ceramic Bearing in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients Under 65 Years of Age.

Authors:  Ahmed A Aoude; John Antoniou; Laura M Epure; Olga L Huk; David J Zukor; Michael Tanzer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Influence of prosthetic design on squeaking after ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Todd V Swanson; David J Peterson; Raghavendran Seethala; Ryan L Bliss; Calvin A Spellmon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Incidence of 'squeaking' after ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kenny Mai; Christopher Verioti; Kace A Ezzet; Steven N Copp; Richard H Walker; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Assessing activity in joint replacement patients.

Authors:  C A Zahiri; T P Schmalzried; E S Szuszczewicz; H C Amstutz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chiu; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The incidence of noise generation arising from the large-diameter Delta Motion ceramic total hip bearing.

Authors:  S M McDonnell; G Boyce; J Baré; D Young; A J Shimmin
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Prevalence of cholesterol screening and high blood cholesterol among adults--United States, 2005, 2007, and 2009.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 17.586

10.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Anna K Nilsdotter; L Stefan Lohmander; Maria Klässbo; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  4 in total

1.  Results of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using 36 mm Femoral Heads on 1st Generation Highly Cross Linked Polyethylene in Patients 50 Years and Less with Minimum Five Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Won-Kee Choi; Myung-Rae Cho; Hee-Soo Kim; Jun-Ho Nam; Seung-Bum Chae
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-06-30

2.  Natural history of noise and squeaking in cementless ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kenta Inagaki; Satoshi Iida; Shuichi Miyamoto; Chiho Suzuki; Takushi Nakatani; Yoshiyuki Shinada; Yuya Kawarai; Shigeo Hagiwara; Junichi Nakamura; Sumihisa Orita; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-09-19

Review 3.  Current Concepts of Using Large Femoral Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Myung-Rae Cho; Won Kee Choi; Jae Jung Kim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-09-30

4.  Do different types of bearings and noise from total hip arthroplasty influence hip-related pain, function, and quality of life postoperatively?

Authors:  Claus Varnum; Alma B Pedersen; Per Kjærsgaard-Andersen; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 3.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.