Literature DB >> 31679485

Differing climatic mechanisms control transient and accumulated vegetation novelty in Europe and eastern North America.

Kevin D Burke1, John W Williams2,3, Simon Brewer4, Walter Finsinger5, Thomas Giesecke6,7, David J Lorenz3, Alejandro Ordonez8.   

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms of climate that produce novel ecosystems is of joint interest to conservation biologists and palaeoecologists. Here, we define and differentiate transient from accumulated novelty and evaluate four climatic mechanisms proposed to cause species to reshuffle into novel assemblages: high climatic novelty, high spatial rates of change (displacement), high variance among displacement rates for individual climate variables, and divergence among displacement vector bearings. We use climate simulations to quantify climate novelty, displacement and divergence across Europe and eastern North America from the last glacial maximum to the present, and fossil pollen records to quantify vegetation novelty. Transient climate novelty is consistently the strongest predictor of transient vegetation novelty, while displacement rates (mean and variance) are equally important in Europe. However, transient vegetation novelty is lower in Europe and its relationship to climatic predictors is the opposite of expectation. For both continents, accumulated novelty is greater than transient novelty, and climate novelty is the strongest predictor of accumulated ecological novelty. These results suggest that controls on novel ecosystems vary with timescale and among continents, and that the twenty-first century emergence of novelty will be driven by both rapid rates of climate change and the emergence of novel climate states. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'The past is a foreign country: how much can the fossil record actually inform conservation?'

Keywords:  climate analogue; climate change; novel climate; novel ecosystem; pollen

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31679485      PMCID: PMC6863489          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  42 in total

Review 1.  Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change.

Authors:  M B Davis; R G Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The pace of shifting climate in marine and terrestrial ecosystems.

Authors:  Michael T Burrows; David S Schoeman; Lauren B Buckley; Pippa Moore; Elvira S Poloczanska; Keith M Brander; Chris Brown; John F Bruno; Carlos M Duarte; Benjamin S Halpern; Johnna Holding; Carrie V Kappel; Wolfgang Kiessling; Mary I O'Connor; John M Pandolfi; Camille Parmesan; Franklin B Schwing; William J Sydeman; Anthony J Richardson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty.

Authors:  Constance I Millar; Nathan L Stephenson; Scott L Stephens
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Climatic changes of the last 18,000 years: observations and model simulations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-08-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Novel ecosystems: concept or inconvenient reality? A response to Murcia et al.

Authors:  Richard J Hobbs; Eric S Higgs; James A Harris
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Emergence patterns of novelty in European vegetation assemblages over the past 15 000 years.

Authors:  Walter Finsinger; Thomas Giesecke; Simon Brewer; Michelle Leydet
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Controlled comparison of species- and community-level models across novel climates and communities.

Authors:  Kaitlin C Maguire; Diego Nieto-Lugilde; Jessica L Blois; Matthew C Fitzpatrick; John W Williams; Simon Ferrier; David J Lorenz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  How will climate novelty influence ecological forecasts? Using the Quaternary to assess future reliability.

Authors:  Matthew C Fitzpatrick; Jessica L Blois; John W Williams; Diego Nieto-Lugilde; Kaitlin C Maguire; David J Lorenz
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  Transient simulation of last deglaciation with a new mechanism for Bolling-Allerod warming.

Authors:  Z Liu; B L Otto-Bliesner; F He; E C Brady; R Tomas; P U Clark; A E Carlson; J Lynch-Stieglitz; W Curry; E Brook; D Erickson; R Jacob; J Kutzbach; J Cheng
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Climate change velocity underestimates climate change exposure in mountainous regions.

Authors:  Solomon Z Dobrowski; Sean A Parks
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  4 in total

1.  Insights from the past: unique opportunity or foreign country?

Authors:  Samuel T Turvey; Erin E Saupe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The rise of novelty in marine ecosystems: The Baltic Sea case.

Authors:  Yosr Ammar; Susa Niiranen; Saskia A Otto; Christian Möllmann; Walter Finsinger; Thorsten Blenckner
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 10.863

3.  Emergence patterns of locally novel plant communities driven by past climate change and modern anthropogenic impacts.

Authors:  Timothy L Staples; Wolfgang Kiessling; John M Pandolfi
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 11.274

4.  Changes in limiting factors for forager population dynamics in Europe across the last glacial-interglacial transition.

Authors:  Alejandro Ordonez; Felix Riede
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 17.694

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.