Literature DB >> 26910424

Dissociation of a Dynamic Protein Complex Studied by All-Atom Molecular Simulations.

Liqun Zhang1, Susmita Borthakur1, Matthias Buck2.   

Abstract

The process of protein complex dissociation remains to be understood at the atomic level of detail. Computers now allow microsecond timescale molecular-dynamics simulations, which make the visualization of such processes possible. Here, we investigated the dissociation process of the EphA2-SHIP2 SAM-SAM domain heterodimer complex using unrestrained all-atom molecular-dynamics simulations. Previous studies on this system have shown that alternate configurations are sampled, that their interconversion can be fast, and that the complex is dynamic by nature. Starting from different NMR-derived structures, mutants were designed to stabilize a subset of configurations by swapping ion pairs across the protein-protein interface. We focused on two mutants, K956D/D1235K and R957D/D1223R, with attenuated binding affinity compared with the wild-type proteins. In contrast to calculations on the wild-type complexes, the majority of simulations of these mutants showed protein dissociation within 2.4 μs. During the separation process, we observed domain rotation and pivoting as well as a translation and simultaneous rolling, typically to alternate and weaker binding interfaces. Several unsuccessful recapturing attempts occurred once the domains were moderately separated. An analysis of protein solvation suggests that the dissociation process correlates with a progressive loss of protein-protein contacts. Furthermore, an evaluation of internal protein dynamics using quasi-harmonic and order parameter analyses indicates that changes in protein internal motions are expected to contribute significantly to the thermodynamics of protein dissociation. Considering protein association as the reverse of the separation process, the initial role of charged/polar interactions is emphasized, followed by changes in protein and solvent dynamics. The trajectories show that protein separation does not follow a single distinct pathway, but suggest that the mechanism of dissociation is common in that it initially involves transitions to surfaces with fewer, less favorable contacts compared with those seen in the fully formed complex.
Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26910424      PMCID: PMC4776036          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.12.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  50 in total

1.  Impact of chemical heterogeneity on protein self-assembly in water.

Authors:  Song-Ho Chong; Sihyun Ham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Molecular simulations of a dynamic protein complex: role of salt-bridges and polar interactions in configurational transitions.

Authors:  Liqun Zhang; Matthias Buck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Proteins feel more than they see: fine-tuning of binding affinity by properties of the non-interacting surface.

Authors:  Panagiotis L Kastritis; João P G L M Rodrigues; Gert E Folkers; Rolf Boelens; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  NMR structure of a heterodimeric SAM:SAM complex: characterization and manipulation of EphA2 binding reveal new cellular functions of SHIP2.

Authors:  Hyeong J Lee; Prasanta K Hota; Preeti Chugha; Hong Guo; Hui Miao; Liqun Zhang; Soon-Jeung Kim; Lukas Stetzik; Bing-Cheng Wang; Matthias Buck
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 5.  Principles of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  S Jones; J M Thornton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Starting-structure dependence of nanosecond timescale intersubstate transitions and reproducibility of MD-derived order parameters.

Authors:  Tim Zeiske; Kate A Stafford; Richard A Friesner; Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-12-24

7.  Hydration of protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Francis Rodier; Ranjit Prasad Bahadur; Pinak Chakrabarti; Joël Janin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-07-01

Review 8.  Fundamental aspects of protein-protein association kinetics.

Authors:  G Schreiber; G Haran; H-X Zhou
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  Entropic contributions and the influence of the hydrophobic environment in promiscuous protein-protein association.

Authors:  Chia-En A Chang; William A McLaughlin; Riccardo Baron; Wei Wang; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  PBEQ-Solver for online visualization of electrostatic potential of biomolecules.

Authors:  Sunhwan Jo; Miklos Vargyas; Judit Vasko-Szedlar; Benoît Roux; Wonpil Im
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  11 in total

1.  Interaction specificity of clustered protocadherins inferred from sequence covariation and structural analysis.

Authors:  John M Nicoludis; Anna G Green; Sanket Walujkar; Elizabeth J May; Marcos Sotomayor; Debora S Marks; Rachelle Gaudet
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations Reveal Isoform Specific Contact Dynamics between the Plexin Rho GTPase Binding Domain (RBD) and Small Rho GTPases Rac1 and Rnd1.

Authors:  Liqun Zhang; Matthias Buck
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  The Sam-Sam interaction between Ship2 and the EphA2 receptor: design and analysis of peptide inhibitors.

Authors:  Flavia Anna Mercurio; Concetta Di Natale; Luciano Pirone; Roberta Iannitti; Daniela Marasco; Emilia Maria Pedone; Rosanna Palumbo; Marilisa Leone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A role of the SAM domain in EphA2 receptor activation.

Authors:  Xiaojun Shi; Vera Hapiak; Ji Zheng; Jeannine Muller-Greven; Deanna Bowman; Ryan Lingerak; Matthias Buck; Bing-Cheng Wang; Adam W Smith
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Phosphorylation promotes binding affinity of Rap-Raf complex by allosteric modulation of switch loop dynamics.

Authors:  Devanand T; Prasanna Venkatraman; Satyavani Vemparala
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  AMPK Signaling Regulates the Age-Related Decline of Hippocampal Neurogenesis.

Authors:  Brian Z Wang; Jane J Yang; Hongxia Zhang; Charity A Smith; Kunlin Jin
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 6.745

7.  Molecular dynamics simulations and functional studies reveal that hBD-2 binds SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD and blocks viral entry into ACE2 expressing cells.

Authors:  Liqun Zhang; Santosh K Ghosh; Shrikanth C Basavarajappa; Jeannine Muller-Greven; Jackson Penfield; Ann Brewer; Parameswaran Ramakrishnan; Matthias Buck; Aaron Weinberg
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2021-01-07

8.  Reaction Pathway Sampling and Free-Energy Analyses for Multimeric Protein Complex Disassembly by Employing Hybrid Configuration Bias Monte Carlo/Molecular Dynamics Simulation.

Authors:  Ikuo Kurisaki; Shigenori Tanaka
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-02-05

9.  HBD-2 binds SARS-CoV-2 RBD and blocks viral entry: Strategy to combat COVID-19.

Authors:  Liqun Zhang; Santosh K Ghosh; Shrikanth C Basavarajappa; Yinghua Chen; Pravesh Shrestha; Jackson Penfield; Ann Brewer; Parameswaran Ramakrishnan; Matthias Buck; Aaron Weinberg
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-02-02

10.  A Systematic Test of Receptor Binding Kinetics for Ligands in Tumor Necrosis Factor Superfamily by Computational Simulations.

Authors:  Zhaoqian Su; Yinghao Wu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.