Literature DB >> 23161667

Starting-structure dependence of nanosecond timescale intersubstate transitions and reproducibility of MD-derived order parameters.

Tim Zeiske1, Kate A Stafford, Richard A Friesner, Arthur G Palmer.   

Abstract

Factors affecting the accuracy of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are investigated by comparing generalized order parameters for backbone NH vectors of the B3 immunoglobulin-binding domain of streptococcal protein G (GB3) derived from simulations with values obtained from NMR spin relaxation (Yao L, Grishaev A, Cornilescu G, Bax A, J Am Chem Soc 2010;132:4295-4309.). Choices for many parameters of the simulations, such as buffer volume, water model, or salt concentration, have only minor influences on the resulting order parameters. In contrast, seemingly minor conformational differences in starting structures, such as orientations of sidechain hydroxyl groups, resulting from applying different protonation algorithms to the same structure, have major effects on backbone dynamics. Some, but not all, of these effects are mitigated by increased sampling in simulations. Most discrepancies between simulated and experimental results occur for residues located at the ends of secondary structures and involve large amplitude nanosecond timescale transitions between distinct conformational substates. These transitions result in autocorrelation functions for bond vector reorientation that do not converge when calculated over individual simulation blocks, typically of length similar to the overall rotational diffusion time. A test for convergence before averaging the order parameters from different blocks results in better agreement between order parameters calculated from different sets of simulations and with NMR-derived order parameters. Thus, MD-derived order parameters are more strongly affected by transitions between conformational substates than by fluctuations within individual substates themselves, while conformational differences in the starting structures affect the frequency and scale of such transitions.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23161667      PMCID: PMC3557728          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  27 in total

1.  Model-free approach to the dynamic interpretation of residual dipolar couplings in globular proteins.

Authors:  J Meiler; J J Prompers; W Peti; C Griesinger; R Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-06-27       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  NMR characterization of the dynamics of biomacromolecules.

Authors:  Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Long-timescale simulation methods.

Authors:  Ron Elber
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Importance of the CMAP correction to the CHARMM22 protein force field: dynamics of hen lysozyme.

Authors:  Matthias Buck; Sabine Bouguet-Bonnet; Richard W Pastor; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

6.  Exploring multiple timescale motions in protein GB3 using accelerated molecular dynamics and NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Phineus R L Markwick; Guillaume Bouvignies; Martin Blackledge
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Structural analysis of protein dynamics by MD simulations and NMR spin-relaxation.

Authors:  Nikola Trbovic; Byungchan Kim; Richard A Friesner; Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-05-01

8.  Are current molecular dynamics force fields too helical?

Authors:  Robert B Best; Nicolae-Viorel Buchete; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Site-specific backbone amide (15)N chemical shift anisotropy tensors in a small protein from liquid crystal and cross-correlated relaxation measurements.

Authors:  Lishan Yao; Alexander Grishaev; Gabriel Cornilescu; Ad Bax
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Kim Palmo; Paul Maragakis; John L Klepeis; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-06
View more
  10 in total

1.  Molecular simulations of a dynamic protein complex: role of salt-bridges and polar interactions in configurational transitions.

Authors:  Liqun Zhang; Matthias Buck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Conformational Dynamics of the Partially Disordered Yeast Transcription Factor GCN4.

Authors:  Paul Robustelli; Nikola Trbovic; Richard A Friesner; Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Dissociation of a Dynamic Protein Complex Studied by All-Atom Molecular Simulations.

Authors:  Liqun Zhang; Susmita Borthakur; Matthias Buck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Thermostability of Enzymes from Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Tim Zeiske; Kate A Stafford; Arthur G Palmer
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Ligand-dependent dynamics of the active-site lid in bacterial dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase.

Authors:  Masooma Rasheed; Christine Richter; Liisa T Chisty; John Kirkpatrick; Martin Blackledge; Martin R Webb; Paul C Driscoll
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Ten simple rules on how to create open access and reproducible molecular simulations of biological systems.

Authors:  Arne Elofsson; Berk Hess; Erik Lindahl; Alexey Onufriev; David van der Spoel; Anders Wallqvist
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Different Dynamics in 6aJL2 Proteins Associated with AL Amyloidosis, a Conformational Disease.

Authors:  Roberto Maya-Martinez; Leidys French-Pacheco; Gilberto Valdés-García; Nina Pastor; Carlos Amero
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Dopamine-Decorated TiO2 Nanoparticles in Water: A QM/MM vs an MM Description.

Authors:  Paulo Siani; Stefano Motta; Lorenzo Ferraro; Asmus O Dohn; Cristiana Di Valentin
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  Effect of dopamine-functionalization, charge and pH on protein corona formation around TiO2 nanoparticles.

Authors:  Paulo Siani; Cristiana Di Valentin
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 7.790

10.  Comparative evaluation of flavonoids reveals the superiority and promising inhibition activity of silibinin against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Rania Hamdy; Ahmed Mostafa; Noura M Abo Shama; Sameh S M Soliman; Bahgat Fayed
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 6.388

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.