Literature DB >> 24768922

Proteins feel more than they see: fine-tuning of binding affinity by properties of the non-interacting surface.

Panagiotis L Kastritis1, João P G L M Rodrigues2, Gert E Folkers2, Rolf Boelens2, Alexandre M J J Bonvin3.   

Abstract

Protein-protein complexes orchestrate most cellular processes such as transcription, signal transduction and apoptosis. The factors governing their affinity remain elusive however, especially when it comes to describing dissociation rates (koff). Here we demonstrate that, next to direct contributions from the interface, the non-interacting surface (NIS) also plays an important role in binding affinity, especially polar and charged residues. Their percentage on the NIS is conserved over orthologous complexes indicating an evolutionary selection pressure. Their effect on binding affinity can be explained by long-range electrostatic contributions and surface-solvent interactions that are known to determine the local frustration of the protein complex surface. Including these in a simple model significantly improves the affinity prediction of protein complexes from structural models. The impact of mutations outside the interacting surface on binding affinity is supported by experimental alanine scanning mutagenesis data. These results enable the development of more sophisticated and integrated biophysical models of binding affinity and open new directions in experimental control and modulation of biomolecular interactions.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  buried surface area; hydrophilicity; hydrophobicity; k(off); protein–protein complexes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24768922     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  40 in total

1.  Constrained Combinatorial Libraries of Gp2 Proteins Enhance Discovery of PD-L1 Binders.

Authors:  Max A Kruziki; Vidur Sarma; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  ACS Comb Sci       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.784

2.  Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation.

Authors:  Sergei Grudinin; Maria Kadukova; Andreas Eisenbarth; Simon Marillet; Frédéric Cazals
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Insights into Actin Polymerization and Nucleation Using a Coarse-Grained Model.

Authors:  Brandon G Horan; Aaron R Hall; Dimitrios Vavylonis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A minimal model of protein-protein binding affinities.

Authors:  Joël Janin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  All tubulins are not alike: Heterodimer dissociation differs among different biological sources.

Authors:  Felipe Montecinos-Franjola; Sumit K Chaturvedi; Peter Schuck; Dan L Sackett
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Dissociation of a Dynamic Protein Complex Studied by All-Atom Molecular Simulations.

Authors:  Liqun Zhang; Susmita Borthakur; Matthias Buck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  EvoDesign: Designing Protein-Protein Binding Interactions Using Evolutionary Interface Profiles in Conjunction with an Optimized Physical Energy Function.

Authors:  Robin Pearce; Xiaoqiang Huang; Dani Setiawan; Yang Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Engineered Charge Redistribution of Gp2 Proteins through Guided Diversity for Improved PET Imaging of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.

Authors:  Brett A Case; Max A Kruziki; Sadie M Johnson; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.774

9.  Protein charge determination and implications for interactions in cell extracts.

Authors:  Ciara Kyne; Kiara Jordon; Dana I Filoti; Thomas M Laue; Peter B Crowley
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking.

Authors:  Daisuke Kuroda; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.