Colleen Rivard1, Rebi Nahum2, Elizabeth Slagle1, Megan Duininck2, Rachel Isaksson Vogel3, Deanna Teoh4. 1. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States. 2. Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States. 3. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States. 4. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States. Electronic address: dkteoh@umn.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) surgical risk calculator to predict complications in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy. METHODS: A chart review of patients who underwent laparotomy on the gynecologic oncology service at a single academic hospital from January 2009 to December 2013 was performed. Preoperative variables were abstracted and NSQIP surgical risk scores were calculated. The risk of any complication, serious complication, death, urinary tract infection, venous thromboembolism, cardiac event, renal complication, pneumonia and surgical site infection were correlated with actual patient outcomes using logistic regression. The c-statistic and Brier score were used to calculate the prediction capability of the risk calculator. RESULTS: Of the 1094 patients reviewed, the majority were <65years old (70.9%), independent (95.2%), ASA class 1-2 (67.3%), and overweight or obese (76.1%). Higher calculated risk scores were associated with an increased risk of the actual complication occurring for all events (p<0.05). The calculator performed best for predicting death (c-statistic=0.851, Brier=0.008), renal failure (c-statistic=0.752, Brier=0.015) and cardiac complications (c-statistic=0.708, Brier=0.011). The calculator did not accurately predict most complications. CONCLUSIONS: The NSQIP surgical risk calculator adequately predicts specific serious complications, such as postoperative death and cardiac complications. However, the overall performance of the calculator was worse for gynecologic oncology patients than reported in general surgery patients. A tailored prediction model may be needed for this patient population.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) surgical risk calculator to predict complications in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy. METHODS: A chart review of patients who underwent laparotomy on the gynecologic oncology service at a single academic hospital from January 2009 to December 2013 was performed. Preoperative variables were abstracted and NSQIP surgical risk scores were calculated. The risk of any complication, serious complication, death, urinary tract infection, venous thromboembolism, cardiac event, renal complication, pneumonia and surgical site infection were correlated with actual patient outcomes using logistic regression. The c-statistic and Brier score were used to calculate the prediction capability of the risk calculator. RESULTS: Of the 1094 patients reviewed, the majority were <65years old (70.9%), independent (95.2%), ASA class 1-2 (67.3%), and overweight or obese (76.1%). Higher calculated risk scores were associated with an increased risk of the actual complication occurring for all events (p<0.05). The calculator performed best for predicting death (c-statistic=0.851, Brier=0.008), renal failure (c-statistic=0.752, Brier=0.015) and cardiac complications (c-statistic=0.708, Brier=0.011). The calculator did not accurately predict most complications. CONCLUSIONS: The NSQIP surgical risk calculator adequately predicts specific serious complications, such as postoperative death and cardiac complications. However, the overall performance of the calculator was worse for gynecologic oncology patients than reported in general surgery patients. A tailored prediction model may be needed for this patient population.
Authors: Bruce L Hall; Barton H Hamilton; Karen Richards; Karl Y Bilimoria; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Y Ko Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jonathan F Finks; Kerry L Kole; Panduranga R Yenumula; Wayne J English; Kevin R Krause; Arthur M Carlin; Jeffrey A Genaw; Mousumi Banerjee; John D Birkmeyer; Nancy J Birkmeyer Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Sonali Patankar; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Yongmei Huang; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Prateek K Gupta; Himani Gupta; Abhishek Sundaram; Manu Kaushik; Xiang Fang; Weldon J Miller; Dennis J Esterbrooks; Claire B Hunter; Iraklis I Pipinos; Jason M Johanning; Thomas G Lynch; R Armour Forse; Syed M Mohiuddin; Aryan N Mooss Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J Brian Szender; Peter J Frederick; Kevin H Eng; Stacey N Akers; Shashikant B Lele; Kunle Odunsi Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Karl Y Bilimoria; Yaoming Liu; Jennifer L Paruch; Lynn Zhou; Thomas E Kmiecik; Clifford Y Ko; Mark E Cohen Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Susan D Wherley; Graham C Chapman; Sangeeta T Mahajan; Adonis K Hijaz; Emily A Slopnick; Kasey Roberts; Sherif El-Nashar Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Jeffrey B Walker; Augustyna Gogoj; Brian D Saunders; Daniel J Canter; Kathleen Lehman; Jay D Raman Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Stephanie Cham; Ling Chen; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Alexander Melamed; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Alexi A Wright; Kari Bohlke; Deborah K Armstrong; Michael A Bookman; William A Cliby; Robert L Coleman; Don S Dizon; Joseph J Kash; Larissa A Meyer; Kathleen N Moore; Alexander B Olawaiye; Jessica Oldham; Ritu Salani; Dee Sparacio; William P Tew; Ignace Vergote; Mitchell I Edelson Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Alexi A Wright; Kari Bohlke; Deborah K Armstrong; Michael A Bookman; William A Cliby; Robert L Coleman; Don S Dizon; Joseph J Kash; Larissa A Meyer; Kathleen N Moore; Alexander B Olawaiye; Jessica Oldham; Ritu Salani; Dee Sparacio; William P Tew; Ignace Vergote; Mitchell I Edelson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 44.544