Literature DB >> 30771346

Development and validation of a risk-calculator for adverse perioperative outcomes for women with ovarian cancer.

Stephanie Cham1, Ling Chen2, Caryn M St Clair3, June Y Hou3, Ana I Tergas4, Alexander Melamed5, Cande V Ananth6, Alfred I Neugut4, Dawn L Hershman4, Jason D Wright7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary cytoreduction followed by platinum-based chemotherapy is the primary treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking is an alternative option, particularly in those who may be poor surgical candidates.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine factors associated with short-term, significant perioperative morbidity and mortality for women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer and to create a nomogram to predict the risk of adverse perioperative outcomes. STUDY
DESIGN: We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify women with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who underwent surgery from 2011 to 2015. Demographic factors, clinical characteristics, comorbidity, functional status, and the extent of surgery were used to predict the risk of severe perioperative complications or death using multivariable models. Multiple imputation methods were employed for missing data. A nomogram was developed based on the final model. The discrimination ability of the model was assessed with a calibration plot and discrimination concordance index.
RESULTS: We identified a total of 7029 patients. Overall, 5.8% of patients experienced a Clavien-Dindo IV complication, 9.8% of patients were readmitted, 3.0% of patients required a reoperation, and 0.9% of patients died within 30 days. Among the baseline variables assessed, increasing age, emergent surgery, ascites, bleeding disorder, low albumin, higher American Society of Anesthesiology classification score, and a higher extended procedure score were associated with serious perioperative morbidity or mortality. Of these factors, performance of ≥3 cytoreductive procedures (adjusted odds ratio 4.53, 95% confidence interval 3.01-6.82), American Society of Anesthesiology classification score ≥ class 4 (adjusted odds ratio 2.89, 95% confidence interval 1.17-7.14), bleeding disorder (adjusted odds ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval 1.82-4.10), and age ≥80 years (adjusted odds ratio 2.46, 95% confidence interval 1.66-3.63) were most strongly associated with risk of an event. The final nomogram included the above variables and had an internal discrimination concordance index of 0.71, with accurate predictions in an internal validation set, indicating a 71% correct identification of patients across all possible pairs.
CONCLUSION: Women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer are at significant risk for the occurrence of adverse perioperative outcomes. Using readily identifiable characteristics, this nomogram can predict adverse outcomes.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complication; cytoreduction; debulking; ovarian cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30771346      PMCID: PMC6545148          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  37 in total

1.  Diaphragmatic surgery during primary debulking in 89 patients with stage IIIB-IV epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D Tsolakidis; F Amant; T Van Gorp; K Leunen; P Neven; I Vergote
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Risk stratification and outcomes of women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sonali Patankar; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Yongmei Huang; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  The addition of extensive upper abdominal surgery to achieve optimal cytoreduction improves survival in patients with stages IIIC-IV epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Eric L Eisenhauer; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A Levine; Elizabeth A Poynor; Carol Aghajanian; William R Jarnagin; Ronald P DeMatteo; Michael I D'Angelica; Richard R Barakat; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Changes in serum CA-125 can predict optimal cytoreduction to no gross residual disease in patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Noah Rodriguez; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Melina Shoni; Ross S Berkowitz; Michael G Muto; Colleen Feltmate; John O Schorge; Marcela G Del Carmen; Ursula A Matulonis; Neil S Horowitz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice.

Authors:  Ian R White; Patrick Royston; Angela M Wood
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Impact of age on 30-day mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Haider Mahdi; David Lockhart; Kathryn A Maurer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  CA125 kinetic parameters predict optimal cytoreduction in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Aurélie Pelissier; Claire Bonneau; Elisabeth Chéreau; Thibault de La Motte Rouge; Virginie Fourchotte; Emile Daraï; Roman Rouzier
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Trends in Mortality After Primary Cytoreductive Surgery for Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaregression of Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies.

Authors:  Violante Di Donato; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Giovanni Aletti; Assunta Casorelli; Ilaria Piacenti; Giorgio Bogani; Francesca Lecce; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Effect of adoption of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer on all cause mortality: quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Alexander Melamed; Günther Fink; Alexi A Wright; Nancy L Keating; Allison A Gockley; Marcela G Del Carmen; John O Schorge; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-01-03

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  13 in total

1.  Risk factors of perioperative complications and management with enhanced recovery after primary surgery in women with epithelial ovarian carcinoma in a single center.

Authors:  Min Li; Tianjiao Zhang; Jing Zhu; Yuebo Li; Wenying Chen; Yanhu Xie; Wei Zhang; Rongzhu Chen; Wei Wei; Guihong Wang; Jiwei Qin; Weidong Zhao; Dabao Wu; Zhen Shen; Björn Nashan; Ying Zhou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.111

2.  Factors predicting postoperative morbidity after cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Malika Kengsakul; Gatske M Nieuwenhuyzen-de Boer; Suwasin Udomkarnjananun; Stephen J Kerr; Christa D Niehot; Heleen J van Beekhuizen
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.756

3.  A retrospective analysis of emergency surgery for cases of acute abdomen during cancer chemotherapy. Case series.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Maeda; Toshiki Shinohara; Nozomi Minagawa; Tadayuki Kobayashi; Ryota Koyama; Shingo Shimada; Yusuke Tsunetoshi; Keisuke Murayama; Haruka Hasegawa
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 4.  Postoperative Admission in Critical Care Units Following Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: Outcomes Based on a Systematic Review and Authors' Recommendations.

Authors:  Nikolaos Thomakos; Anastasia Prodromidou; Dimitrios Haidopoulos; Nikolaos Machairas; Alexandros Rodolakis
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Risk Factors for Severe Complications in Ovarian Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Eva Katharina Egger; Natascha Kohls; Matthias B Stope; Mateja Condic; Mignon-Denise Keyver-Paik; Dominique KÖnsgen; Tobias Hilbert; Sven Klaschik; Daniel Exner; Tim Vilz; Alexander Mustea
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Advanced ovarian cancer and cytoreductive surgery: Independent validation of a risk-calculator for perioperative adverse events.

Authors:  Alli M Straubhar; Jennifer L Wolf; Ms Qin C Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Stephanie Cham; Jason D Wright; Kara Long Roche; Dennis S Chi; Oliver Zivanovic
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Development and validation for prognostic nomogram of epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence based on circulating tumor cells and epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Jiani Yang; Jun Ma; Yue Jin; Shanshan Cheng; Shan Huang; Nan Zhang; Yu Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Incidence of venous thromboembolism after standard treatment in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer in Korea.

Authors:  Wonkyo Shin; Sanghee Lee; Myong Cheol Lim; Jipmin Jung; Hak Jin Kim; Hyunsoon Cho
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Surgical risk assessment for gynecological oncologic patients.

Authors:  Çağlayan Biçer; Jalal Raoufi; Serhan Can İşcan; Mehmet Güney; Evrim Erdemoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-10-10

10.  Fibrinogen/albumin ratio as a promising predictor of platinum response and survival in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Boer Shan; Shuling Zhou; Huijuan Yang; Shuang Ye
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.