Literature DB >> 27650684

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Alexi A Wright1, Kari Bohlke2, Deborah K Armstrong3, Michael A Bookman4, William A Cliby5, Robert L Coleman6, Don S Dizon7, Joseph J Kash8, Larissa A Meyer9, Kathleen N Moore10, Alexander B Olawaiye11, Jessica Oldham12, Ritu Salani13, Dee Sparacio14, William P Tew15, Ignace Vergote16, Mitchell I Edelson17.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction among women with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer.
METHODS: The Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature.
RESULTS: Four phase III clinical trials form the primary evidence base for the recommendations. The published studies suggest that for selected women with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction are non-inferior to primary cytoreduction and adjuvant chemotherapy with respect to overall and progression-free survival and are associated with less perioperative morbidity and mortality. RECOMMENDATIONS: All women with suspected stage IIIC or IV invasive epithelial ovarian cancer should be evaluated by a gynecologic oncologist prior to initiation of therapy. The primary clinical evaluation should include a CT of the abdomen and pelvis, and chest imaging (CT preferred). Women with a high perioperative risk profile or a low likelihood of achieving cytoreduction to <1cm of residual disease (ideally to no visible disease) should receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Women who are fit for primary cytoreductive surgery, and with potentially resectable disease, may receive either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary cytoreductive surgery. However, primary cytoreductive surgery is preferred if there is a high likelihood of achieving cytoreduction to <1cm (ideally to no visible disease) with acceptable morbidity. Before neoadjuvant chemotherapy is delivered, all patients should have confirmation of an invasive ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/NACT-ovarian-guideline and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Cytoreductive surgery; Guideline; Neoadjuvant; Ovarian cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27650684      PMCID: PMC5413203          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  53 in total

1.  A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Andreas du Bois; Hans-Joachim Lück; Werner Meier; Hans-Peter Adams; Volker Möbus; Serban Costa; Thomas Bauknecht; Barbara Richter; Matthias Warm; Willibald Schröder; Sigrid Olbricht; Ulrike Nitz; Christian Jackisch; Günther Emons; Uwe Wagner; Walther Kuhn; Jacobus Pfisterer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Deborah K Armstrong; Brian Bundy; Lari Wenzel; Helen Q Huang; Rebecca Baergen; Shashikant Lele; Larry J Copeland; Joan L Walker; Robert A Burger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Developing a cancer-specific geriatric assessment: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Supriya Gupta; Marjorie Zauderer; Enid L Zuckerman; Harvey J Cohen; Hyman Muss; Miriam Rodin; Katherine S Panageas; Jimmie C Holland; Leonard Saltz; Mark G Kris; Ariela Noy; Jorge Gomez; Ann Jakubowski; Clifford Hudis; Alice B Kornblith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan.

Authors:  A N Gordon; J T Fleagle; D Guthrie; D E Parkin; M E Gore; A J Lacave
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: an intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  M Markman; B N Bundy; D S Alberts; J M Fowler; D L Clark-Pearson; L F Carson; S Wadler; J Sickel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Multi-institutional reciprocal validation study of computed tomography predictors of suboptimal primary cytoreduction in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Allison E Axtell; Margaret H Lee; Robert E Bristow; Sean C Dowdy; William A Cliby; Steven Raman; John P Weaver; Mojan Gabbay; Michael Ngo; Scott Lentz; Ilana Cass; Andrew J Li; Beth Y Karlan; Christine H Holschneider
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Ovarian cancer: patterns of surgical care across the United States.

Authors:  Barbara A Goff; Barbara J Matthews; Michelle Wynn; Howard G Muntz; Denise M Lishner; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Effect of surgeon specialty on processes of care and outcomes for ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Craig C Earle; Deborah Schrag; Bridget A Neville; K Robin Yabroff; Marie Topor; Angela Fahey; Edward L Trimble; Diane C Bodurka; Robert E Bristow; Michael Carney; Joan L Warren
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Robert F Ozols; Brian N Bundy; Benjamin E Greer; Jeffrey M Fowler; Daniel Clarke-Pearson; Robert A Burger; Robert S Mannel; Koen DeGeest; Ellen M Hartenbach; Rebecca Baergen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-14       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Influence of the gynecologic oncologist on the survival of ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  John K Chan; Daniel S Kapp; Jacob Y Shin; Amreen Husain; Nelson N Teng; Jonathan S Berek; Kathryn Osann; Gary S Leiserowitz; Rosemary D Cress; Cynthia O'Malley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  57 in total

1.  The American College of Surgeon's surgical risk calculator's ability to predict disposition in older gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy.

Authors:  Salma Shaker; Colleen Rivard; Rebi Nahum; Rachel I Vogel; Deanna Teoh
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  Superior in vitro and in vivo activity of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) in comparison to trastuzumab, pertuzumab and their combination in epithelial ovarian carcinoma with high HER2/neu expression.

Authors:  Gulden Menderes; Elena Bonazzoli; Stefania Bellone; Gary Altwerger; Jonathan D Black; Katherine Dugan; Francesca Pettinella; Alice Masserdotti; Francesco Riccio; Anna Bianchi; Luca Zammataro; Christopher de Haydu; Natalia Buza; Pei Hui; Serena Wong; Gloria S Huang; Babak Litkouhi; Elena Ratner; Dan-Arin Silasi; Masoud Azodi; Peter E Schwartz; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Concordance of laparoscopic and laparotomic peritoneal cancer index using a two-step surgical protocol to select patients for cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Martina Aida Angeles; Federico Migliorelli; Mathilde Del; Carlos Martínez-Gómez; Manon Daix; Sarah Bétrian; Erwan Gabiache; Gisèle Balagué; Sophie Leclerc; Eliane Mery; Laurence Gladieff; Gwénaël Ferron; Alejandra Martinez
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  A prospective trial of acute normovolemic hemodilution in patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Edward J Tanner; Olga T Filippova; Ginger J Gardner; Kara C Long Roche; Yukio Sonoda; Oliver Zivanovic; Mary Fischer; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Complications and Survivorship Trends After Primary Debulking Surgery for Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Zhaomin Xu; Adan Z Becerra; Carla F Justiniano; Christopher T Aquina; Fergal J Fleming; Francis P Boscoe; Maria J Schymura; Abdulrahman K Sinno; Jessica Chaoul; Gary R Morrow; Lori Minasian; Sarah M Temkin
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Quality Indicators and Survival Outcome in Stage IIIB-IVB Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treated at a Single Institution.

Authors:  Inga Steinberga; Kjell Jansson; Bengt Sorbe
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Overview of imaging findings associated with systemic therapies in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ezgi Guler; Daniel A Smith; Bhanusupriya Somarouthu; Rahul Gujrathi; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Sree Harsha Tirumani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-03

8.  National trends in bowel and upper abdominal procedures in ovarian cancer surgery.

Authors:  Joseph A Dottino; Weiguo He; Charlotte C Sun; Hui Zhao; Shuangshuang Fu; Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Rudy S Suidan; Karen H Lu; Sharon H Giordano; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  Clinical Staging of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Andrea S O'Shea
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

10.  18F-FDG-PET/CT based total metabolic tumor volume change during neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts outcome in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Tuulia Vallius; Johanna Hynninen; Jukka Kemppainen; Victor Alves; Kari Auranen; Jaakko Matomäki; Sinikka Oksa; Johanna Virtanen; Seija Grénman; Annika Auranen; Marko Seppänen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.