Literature DB >> 26894416

Bone-anchored hearing aids in conductive and mixed hearing losses: why do patients reject them?

Richard T K Siau1,2, Baljeet Dhillon3, Derrick Siau4, Kevin M J Green5,6.   

Abstract

This study aimed to report the bone-anchored hearing aid uptake rate and the reasons for their rejection by patients with conductive and mixed hearing losses. A retrospective review was performed of 113 consecutive patients with unilateral or bilateral conductive or mixed hearing loss referred to the Greater Manchester bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) programme between September 2008 and August 2011. 98 (86.7 %) patients were deemed audiologically suitable for BAHA implantation. Of these, 38 (38.8 %) had BAHA implanted; 60 (61.2 %) patients declined. Of those who declined, 27 (45 %) cited anxiety over surgery, 18 (30 %) cited cosmetic reasons, 16 (26.7 %) perceived limited benefit from the device and six (10 %) preferred conventional hearing aids. Our study highlights a 38.8 % BAHA uptake rate in audiologically suitable patients. The main reasons cited for rejection of BAHA were anxiety over surgery and cosmetic concerns. It is important that clinicians address these early during consultation with prospective BAHA recipients and avoid rushing to implant these patients with a bone-anchored hearing aid.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult; BAHA; Hearing aids; Hearing loss; Prostheses and implants; Satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26894416     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-3941-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  24 in total

1.  The importance of an extended preoperative trial of BAHA in unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  R J E Pennings; M Gulliver; D P Morris
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.597

2.  BAHA or MedEl Vibrant Soundbridge: results and criteria of decision.

Authors:  Mathieu Côté; Olivier Deguine; Marie-Noëlle Calmels; Gaétan Iversenc; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2011-05

3.  The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: referrals, selection, rehabilitation, philosophy and adult results.

Authors:  H R Cooper; S P Burrell; R H Powell; D W Proops; J A Bickerton
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol Suppl       Date:  1996

4.  Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant.

Authors:  Dominik Riss; Christoph Arnoldner; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Michaela Blineder; Stefan Flak; Anna Bachner; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Jafar-Sasan Hamzavi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Abutment-free bone-anchored hearing devices in children: initial results and experience.

Authors:  Aaron Centric; Sri Kiran Chennupati
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Long-term results of bone-anchored hearing aid recipients who had previously used air-conduction hearing aids.

Authors:  Myrthe K S Hol; Ad F M Snik; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Cor W R J Cremers
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-04

7.  A one-stage surgical procedure for placement of percutaneous implants for the bone-anchored hearing aid.

Authors:  E A Mylanus; C W Cremers
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.469

8.  Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a 14-year experience.

Authors:  Khaled Badran; Dan Bunstone; Arvind K Arya; Ranganathan Suryanarayanan; Neil Mackinnon
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  A survey of satisfaction and use among patients fitted with a BAHA.

Authors:  Stéphane Tringali; Alexis Bozorg Grayeli; Didier Bouccara; Olivier Sterkers; Sandrine Chardon; Christian Martin; Christian Dubreuil
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Single-stage BAHA implantation in adults and children: is it safe?

Authors:  Darius Kohan; Luc G T Morris; Thomas Romo
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of wireless Bluetooth devices to improve recognition of speech and sentences when using a mobile phone in bone conduction device recipients.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Kong; Chanbeom Kwak; Woojae Han; Young Joon Seo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Complications of Transcutaneous Protheses - A Systematic Review of Publications Over the Past 10 Years.

Authors:  Marcos Antonio de Souza; Santiago Luis Vallejos Riart; Stephanie Rugeri de Souza; Rubens de Brito; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-02-04

3.  Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output in Bone Anchored Hearing Systems: A Crossover Study.

Authors:  Elin Bergius; Marianne Philipsson; Tove Rosenbom; André Sadeghi
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.619

4.  Speech Understanding and Sound Localization with a New Nonimplantable Wearing Option for Baha.

Authors:  Tom Gawliczek; Wilhelm Wimmer; Fabio Munzinger; Marco Caversaccio; Martin Kompis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.