Literature DB >> 25142577

Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant.

Dominik Riss1, Christoph Arnoldner, Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner, Michaela Blineder, Stefan Flak, Anna Bachner, Wolfgang Gstoettner, Jafar-Sasan Hamzavi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to evaluate functional hearing gain, speech understanding, and preoperative bone-conduction thresholds with the bone-conduction implant Bonebridge. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study at a tertiary referral center.
METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive Bonebridge patients were identified. Nine patients suffered from combined hearing loss (HL), 12 from atresia of the external auditory canal and three from single-sided deafness. One patient was lost to follow-up. Twenty-three patients were therefore analyzed.
RESULTS: The overall average functional hearing gain of all patients (n = 23) was 28.8 dB (±16.1 standard deviation [SD]). Monosyllabic word scores at 65 dB sound pressure level in quiet increased statistically significantly from 4.6 (±7.4 SD) percentage points to 53.7 (±23.0 SD) percentage points. Evaluation of preoperative bone-conduction thresholds revealed three patients with thresholds higher than 45 dB HL in the high frequencies starting at 2 kHz. These three patients had a very limited benefit of their bone-conduction implants.
CONCLUSIONS: The Bonebridge bone-conduction implant provides satisfactory results concerning functional gain and speech perception if preoperative bone conduction lies within 45 dB HL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
© 2014 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bonebridge; bone-anchored hearing aid; bone-conduction implant; indication criteria; outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25142577     DOI: 10.1002/lary.24832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  21 in total

1.  Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use.

Authors:  Sébastien Schmerber; O Deguine; M Marx; P Van de Heyning; O Sterkers; I Mosnier; P Garin; B Godey; C Vincent; F Venail; M Mondain; A Deveze; J P Lavieille; A Karkas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A multicenter study on objective and subjective benefits with a transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid device: first Nordic results.

Authors:  Dan Dupont Hougaard; Soren Kjaergaard Boldsen; Anne Marie Jensen; Soren Hansen; Per Cayé Thomassen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Bone-anchored hearing aids in conductive and mixed hearing losses: why do patients reject them?

Authors:  Richard T K Siau; Baljeet Dhillon; Derrick Siau; Kevin M J Green
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Postoperative pain in patients undergoing a transcutaneous active bone conduction implant (Bonebridge).

Authors:  Luis Lassaletta; Miryam Calvino; Mario Zernotti; Javier Gavilán
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.

Authors:  Roxanne Weiss; Martin Leinung; Uwe Baumann; Tobias Weißgerber; Tobias Rader; Timo Stöver
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Utility of 3D printed temporal bones in pre-surgical planning for complex BoneBridge cases.

Authors:  Payal Mukherjee; Kai Cheng; Sean Flanagan; Simon Greenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Long-term audiological benefit with an active transcutaneous bone-conduction device: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Julia Hundertpfund; Jens Eduard Meyer; Attila Ovari
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Three-Year Follow-Up with the Bone Conduction Implant.

Authors:  Ann-Charlotte Persson; Sabine Reinfeldt; Bo Håkansson; Cristina Rigato; Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson; Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 9.  New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review.

Authors:  Sabine Reinfeldt; Bo Håkansson; Hamidreza Taghavi; Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-01-16

10.  The Prediction of Speech Recognition in Noise With a Semi-Implantable Bone Conduction Hearing System by External Bone Conduction Stimulation With Headband: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Friedrich Ihler; Jenny Blum; Max-Ulrich Berger; Bernhard G Weiss; Christian Welz; Martin Canis
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.