Literature DB >> 24612554

Abutment-free bone-anchored hearing devices in children: initial results and experience.

Aaron Centric1, Sri Kiran Chennupati2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Bone-anchored implantable hearing devices are widely accepted as a surgical option for certain types of hearing loss in both adults and children. Most commercially available devices involve a percutaneous abutment to which a sound processor attaches. The rate of complications with such bone conduction systems is greater than 20%. Most complications arise from the abutment. Recently, the Sophono (Boulder, CO) Alpha 1, an abutment-free system, has been introduced. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of the first five patients who underwent implantation with the Sophono abutment-free bone conduction hearing system with the Alpha 1 processor at our institution and report here on these patients' pre- and postoperative audiometric data and clinical courses.
RESULTS: Average improvement in pure-tone average was 32dB hearing loss and average improvement in speech response threshold was 28dB hearing loss. All patients were responding in the normal to mild hearing loss range in the operated ear after device activation. Average improvement across individual frequencies was between 17 and 37dB (SD 5.5-11dB).
CONCLUSION: Our audiometric results to date are promising and have been consistent with published data on other bone-anchored hearing devices.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abutment-free bone conduction hearing system; Bone-anchored implantable hearing augmentation; Children; Hearing aid; Hearing loss; Pediatrics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24612554     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  5 in total

1.  Switching from a percutaneous to a transcutaneous bone anchored hearing system: the utility of the fascia temporalis superficialis pedicled flap in case of skin intolerance.

Authors:  A Devèze; S Rossetto; R Meller; M Sanjuan Puchol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Bone-anchored hearing aids in conductive and mixed hearing losses: why do patients reject them?

Authors:  Richard T K Siau; Baljeet Dhillon; Derrick Siau; Kevin M J Green
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Three-year experience with the Sophono in children with congenital conductive unilateral hearing loss: tolerability, audiometry, and sound localization compared to a bone-anchored hearing aid.

Authors:  Rik C Nelissen; Martijn J H Agterberg; Myrthe K S Hol; Ad F M Snik
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The Prediction of Speech Recognition in Noise With a Semi-Implantable Bone Conduction Hearing System by External Bone Conduction Stimulation With Headband: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Friedrich Ihler; Jenny Blum; Max-Ulrich Berger; Bernhard G Weiss; Christian Welz; Martin Canis
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Active transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implants: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Astrid Magele; Philipp Schoerg; Barbara Stanek; Bernhard Gradl; Georg Mathias Sprinzl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.