Literature DB >> 21883961

The importance of an extended preoperative trial of BAHA in unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: a prospective cohort study.

R J E Pennings1, M Gulliver, D P Morris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The influence of an extended preoperative trial of bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) and headband on the decision to proceed with surgery in cases of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss is studied.
DESIGN: In this prospective study, the headband was introduced after assessment confirmed suitable candidacy. Those who had an initially favourable response to the headband trial were encouraged to complete a 2-week home trial of device and headband. Patients were asked to pay special attention to situations where they perceived high demands on their hearing, e.g. at the dinner table, in the car, walking outside etc. Counselling regarding the BAHA placement, the need for daily care of the implant site and the financial implications of acquiring the device was also given.
SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss, fulfilling criteria for BAHA surgery, with favourable response to initial 'office trial' of headband. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: After 2-week home trial, BAHA and headband were returned with a statement of the patient's intentions.
RESULTS: Sixteen of 50 (32%) patients who expressed definite interest in BAHA surgery after a positive introduction to the headband in the office did not wish to proceed to surgery having completed a more thorough 2-week trial of device at home. Most patients cited a failure of the device to meet their hearing requirements. Subsequently, we found further attrition with nine more patients (18%) deciding at a still later date, not to proceed with surgery. Ultimately, just 25 of 50 (50%) of our initially enthusiastic group chose not to proceed to surgery. In the group who did proceed, there were no non-users.
CONCLUSIONS: We propose the importance of an extended preoperative trial where BAHA is considered in the rehabilitation of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The trial may foster more realistic expectations of device performance in this challenging group. A 'cooling-off' period before surgery also appears to lead to further attrition with the ultimate reward of no non-users in those proceeding to surgery.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21883961     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02388.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  4 in total

1.  Effectiveness in Rehabilitation of Current Wireless CROS Technology in Experienced Bone-Anchored Implant Users.

Authors:  Hillary A Snapp; Michael E Hoffer; Xuezhong Liu; Suhrud M Rajguru
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Bone-anchored hearing aids in conductive and mixed hearing losses: why do patients reject them?

Authors:  Richard T K Siau; Baljeet Dhillon; Derrick Siau; Kevin M J Green
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Mechanisms of Localization and Speech Perception with Colocated and Spatially Separated Noise and Speech Maskers Under Single-Sided Deafness with a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Coral Dirks; Peggy B Nelson; Douglas P Sladen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Cochlear Implantation and Other Treatments in Single-Sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss: Results of a National Multicenter Study Including a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mathieu Marx; Isabelle Mosnier; Frederic Venail; Michel Mondain; Alain Uziel; David Bakhos; Emmanuel Lescanne; Yann N'Guyen; Daniele Bernardeschi; Olivier Sterkers; Olivier Deguine; Benoît Lepage; Benoit Godey; Sébastien Schmerber; Nicolas-Xavier Bonne; Christophe Vincent; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 1.854

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.