Haridoss Selvakumar1, Swaminathan Kavitha1, Eapen Thomas2, Vasanthakumari Anadhan3, Rajendran Vijayakumar4. 1. Reader, Department of Pedodontics, Sri Ramachandra University , Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India . 2. Professor, Department of Paedodontia, Dr. Sunny Medical Centre , UAE . 3. Professor and Head, Department of Pedodontics, Adhiparasakthi Dental College and Hospital , Melmaruvathur, Tamilnadu, India . 4. Reader, Department of Pedodontics, S.R.M Dental College, SRM University , Chennai, Chennai, India .
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The intention of root canal preparation is to reduce infected content and create a root canal shape allowing for a well condensed root filling. Therefore, it is not necessary to remove excessive dentine for successful root canal preparation and concern must be taken not to over instrument as perforations can occur in the thin dentinal walls of primary molars. AIM: This study was done to evaluate the time preparation, the risk of lateral perforation and dentine removal of the stainless steel K file and K3 rotary instrumentation in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five primary molars were selected and divided into three groups. Using spiral computed tomography the teeth were scanned before instrumentation. Teeth were prepared using a stainless steel K file for manual technique. All the canals were prepared up to file size 35. In K3 rotary files (.02 taper) instrumentation was done up to 35 size file. In K3 rotary files (.04 taper) the instrumentation was done up to 25 size file and simultaneously the instrumentation time was recorded. The instrumented teeth were once again scanned and the images were compared with the images of the uninstrumented canals. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data was statistically analysed using Kruskal Wallis One-way ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U-Test and Pearson's Chi-square Test. RESULTS: K3 rotary files (.02 taper) removed a significantly less amount of dentine, required less instrumentation time than a stainless steel K file. CONCLUSION: K3 files (.02 taper) generated less dentine removal than the stainless steel K file and K3 files (.04 taper). K3 rotary files (.02 taper) were more effective for root canal instrumentation in primary teeth.
INTRODUCTION: The intention of root canal preparation is to reduce infected content and create a root canal shape allowing for a well condensed root filling. Therefore, it is not necessary to remove excessive dentine for successful root canal preparation and concern must be taken not to over instrument as perforations can occur in the thin dentinal walls of primary molars. AIM: This study was done to evaluate the time preparation, the risk of lateral perforation and dentine removal of the stainless steel K file and K3 rotary instrumentation in primary teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five primary molars were selected and divided into three groups. Using spiral computed tomography the teeth were scanned before instrumentation. Teeth were prepared using a stainless steel K file for manual technique. All the canals were prepared up to file size 35. In K3 rotary files (.02 taper) instrumentation was done up to 35 size file. In K3 rotary files (.04 taper) the instrumentation was done up to 25 size file and simultaneously the instrumentation time was recorded. The instrumented teeth were once again scanned and the images were compared with the images of the uninstrumented canals. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Data was statistically analysed using Kruskal Wallis One-way ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U-Test and Pearson's Chi-square Test. RESULTS: K3 rotary files (.02 taper) removed a significantly less amount of dentine, required less instrumentation time than a stainless steel K file. CONCLUSION: K3 files (.02 taper) generated less dentine removal than the stainless steel K file and K3 files (.04 taper). K3 rotary files (.02 taper) were more effective for root canal instrumentation in primary teeth.
Entities:
Keywords:
Dentin removal; Lateral perforation; Time preparation
Authors: Thais Regina Kummer; Maria Cristina Calvo; Mabel Mariela Rodríguez Cordeiro; Ricardo de Sousa Vieira; Maria José de Carvalho Rocha Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2008-04