Literature DB >> 26889673

Generating a taxonomy for genetic conditions relevant to reproductive planning.

Diane M Korngiebel1, Carmit K McMullen2, Laura M Amendola3, Jonathan S Berg4, James V Davis2, Marian J Gilmore5, Cary O Harding6, Patricia Himes5, Gail P Jarvik3, Tia L Kauffman2, Kathleen A Kennedy7, Dana Kostiner Simpson5, Michael C Leo2, Frances L Lynch2, Denise I Quigley2, Jacob A Reiss2, C Sue Richards6, Alan F Rope5, Jennifer L Schneider2, Katrina A B Goddard2, Benjamin S Wilfond8,9.   

Abstract

As genome or exome sequencing (hereafter genome-scale sequencing) becomes more integrated into standard care, carrier testing is an important possible application. Carrier testing using genome-scale sequencing can identify a large number of conditions, but choosing which conditions/genes to evaluate as well as which results to disclose can be complicated. Carrier testing generally occurs in the context of reproductive decision-making and involves patient values in a way that other types of genetic testing may not. The Kaiser Permanente Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research program is conducting a randomized clinical trial of preconception carrier testing that allows participants to select their preferences for results from among broad descriptive categories rather than selecting individual conditions. This paper describes (1) the criteria developed by the research team, the return of results committee (RORC), and stakeholders for defining the categories; (2) the process of refining the categories based on input from patient focus groups and validation through a patient survey; and (3) how the RORC then assigned specific gene-condition pairs to taxonomy categories being piloted in the trial. The development of four categories (serious, moderate/mild, unpredictable, late onset) for sharing results allows patients to select results based on their values without separately deciding their interest in knowing their carrier status for hundreds of conditions. A fifth category, lifespan limiting, was always shared. The lessons learned may be applicable in other results disclosure situations, such as incidental findings.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carrier testing; genome sequencing; return of results

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26889673      PMCID: PMC4860293          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  16 in total

1.  Disability advocacy and reproductive choice: engaging with the expressivist objection.

Authors:  Madelyn Peterson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  What does choice really mean? Prenatal testing, disability, and special education without illusions.

Authors:  Deborah Pergament
Journal:  Health Matrix Clevel       Date:  2013

Review 3.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 486: Update on carrier screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Suzanna G M Frints; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 442: Preconception and prenatal carrier screening for genetic diseases in individuals of Eastern European Jewish descent.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Law, reproduction, and disability: fatally 'handicapped'?

Authors:  Sheelagh McGuinness
Journal:  Med Law Rev       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  The expressivist objection to prenatal testing: the experiences of families living with genetic disease.

Authors:  Felicity Kate Boardman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Ashkenazi Jewish screening in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Susan Klugman; Susan J Gross
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here.

Authors:  Teri A Manolio; Rex L Chisholm; Brad Ozenberger; Dan M Roden; Marc S Williams; Richard Wilson; David Bick; Erwin P Bottinger; Murray H Brilliant; Charis Eng; Kelly A Frazer; Bruce Korf; David H Ledbetter; James R Lupski; Clay Marsh; David Mrazek; Michael F Murray; Peter H O'Donnell; Daniel J Rader; Mary V Relling; Alan R Shuldiner; David Valle; Richard Weinshilboum; Eric D Green; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  8 in total

1.  Clinician-Stakeholders' Perspectives on Using Patient Portals to Return Lynch Syndrome Screening Results.

Authors:  Diane M Korngiebel; Kathleen M West; Wylie Burke
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genome sequencing and carrier testing: decisions on categorization and whether to disclose results of carrier testing.

Authors:  Patricia Himes; Tia L Kauffman; Kristin R Muessig; Laura M Amendola; Jonathan S Berg; Michael O Dorschner; Marian Gilmore; Deborah A Nickerson; Jacob A Reiss; C Sue Richards; Alan F Rope; Dana K Simpson; Benjamin S Wilfond; Gail P Jarvik; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Outcomes of an International Workshop on Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening: Some Considerations for Governments.

Authors:  Caron M Molster; Karla Lister; Selina Metternick-Jones; Gareth Baynam; Angus John Clarke; Volker Straub; Hugh J S Dawkins; Nigel Laing
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-02-24

4.  Preventing lives affected by hemophilia: A mixed methods study of the views of adults with hemophilia and their families toward genetic screening.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale; Raksha Gohel; Philip J Young
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.183

5.  Approaches to carrier testing and results disclosure in translational genomics research: The clinical sequencing exploratory research consortium experience.

Authors:  Kathryn M Porter; Tia L Kauffman; Barbara A Koenig; Katie L Lewis; Heidi L Rehm; Carolyn Sue Richards; Natasha T Strande; Holly K Tabor; Susan M Wolf; Yaping Yang; Laura M Amendola; Danielle R Azzariti; Jonathan S Berg; Katie Bergstrom; Leslie G Biesecker; Sawona Biswas; Kevin M Bowling; Wendy K Chung; Ellen W Clayton; Laura K Conlin; Gregory M Cooper; Matthew C Dulik; Levi A Garraway; Arezou A Ghazani; Robert C Green; Susan M Hiatt; Seema M Jamal; Gail P Jarvik; Katrina A B Goddard; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.183

6.  How do genetically disabled adults view selective reproduction? Impairment, identity, and genetic screening.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 2.183

7.  Responsibility, identity, and genomic sequencing: A comparison of published recommendations and patient perspectives on accepting or declining incidental findings.

Authors:  Felicity Boardman; Rachel Hale
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 2.183

Review 8.  The evolving landscape of expanded carrier screening: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Devan Duenas; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 8.822

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.