Literature DB >> 26888675

Motion Predicts Clinical Callus Formation: Construct-Specific Finite Element Analysis of Supracondylar Femoral Fractures.

Jacob Elkins1, J Lawrence Marsh1, Trevor Lujan2, Richard Peindl3, James Kellam4, Donald D Anderson1, William Lack5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mechanotransduction is theorized to influence fracture-healing, but optimal fracture-site motion is poorly defined. We hypothesized that three-dimensional (3-D) fracture-site motion as estimated by finite element (FE) analysis would influence callus formation for a clinical series of supracondylar femoral fractures treated with locking-plate fixation.
METHODS: Construct-specific FE modeling simulated 3-D fracture-site motion for sixty-six supracondylar femoral fractures (OTA/AO classification of 33A or 33C) treated at a single institution. Construct stiffness and directional motion through the fracture were investigated to assess the validity of construct stiffness as a surrogate measure of 3-D motion at the fracture site. Callus formation was assessed radiographically for all patients at six, twelve, and twenty-four weeks postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses examined the effects of longitudinal motion, shear (transverse motion), open fracture, smoking, and diabetes on callus formation. Construct types were compared to determine whether their 3-D motion profile was associated with callus formation.
RESULTS: Shear disproportionately increased relative to longitudinal motion with increasing bridge span, which was not predicted by our assessment of construct stiffness alone. Callus formation was not associated with open fracture, smoking, or diabetes at six, twelve, or twenty-four weeks. However, callus formation was associated with 3-D fracture-site motion at twelve and twenty-four weeks. Longitudinal motion promoted callus formation at twelve and twenty-four weeks (p = 0.017 for both). Shear inhibited callus formation at twelve and twenty-four weeks (p = 0.017 and p = 0.022, respectively). Titanium constructs with a short bridge span demonstrated greater longitudinal motion with less shear than did the other constructs, and this was associated with greater callus formation (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study of supracondylar femoral fractures treated with locking-plate fixation, longitudinal motion promoted callus formation, while shear inhibited callus formation. Construct stiffness was found to be a poor surrogate of fracture-site motion. Future implant design and operative fixation strategies should seek to optimize 3-D fracture-site motion rather than rely on surrogate measures such as axial stiffness.
Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26888675      PMCID: PMC5141368          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  40 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology.

Authors:  Stephan M Perren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-11

2.  Predicting the external formation of a bone fracture callus: an optimisation approach.

Authors:  D P Comiskey; B J MacDonald; W T McCartney; K Synnott; J O'Byrne
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 1.763

3.  Locked plates combined with minimally invasive insertion technique for the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  William M Ricci; Timothy Loftus; Christopher Cox; Joseph Borrelli
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Three-dimensional strain fields in a uniform osteotomy gap.

Authors:  A M DiGioia; E J Cheal; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  The role of interfragmentary strain on the rate of bone healing-a new interpretation and mathematical model.

Authors:  D P Comiskey; B J Macdonald; W T McCartney; K Synnott; J O'Byrne
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Interfragmentary motion in tibial osteotomies stabilized with ring fixators.

Authors:  Georg N Duda; Michael Sollmann; Simon Sporrer; Jan E Hoffmann; Jean-Pierre Kassi; Cyrus Khodadadyan; Michael Raschke
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Biomechanics of locked plates and screws.

Authors:  Kenneth A Egol; Erik N Kubiak; Eric Fulkerson; Frederick J Kummer; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Minimal-invasive treatment of distal femoral fractures with the LISS (Less Invasive Stabilization System): a prospective study of 30 fractures with a follow up of 20 months.

Authors:  Florian Fankhauser; Gerald Gruber; Gert Schippinger; Christian Boldin; Herwig P Hofer; Wolfgang Grechenig; Rudolf Szyszkowitz
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-02

9.  The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures.

Authors:  A E Goodship; J Kenwright
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1985-08

10.  Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?

Authors:  Karl Stoffel; Ulrich Dieter; Gwidon Stachowiak; André Gächter; Markus S Kuster
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  17 in total

1.  Interfragmentary lag screw and locking plate combination in simple distal femoral fractures: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Yan Wei; Guoding Li; Jian Wang; Youjia Xu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.511

2.  From Bench to Bedside: How Stiff is Too Stiff? Far-cortical Locking or Dynamic Locked Plating May Obviate the Question.

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Finite Element-Derived Surrogate Models of Locked Plate Fracture Fixation Biomechanics.

Authors:  Hwabok Wee; J Spence Reid; Vernon M Chinchilli; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  [Current status and progress of locking plate in the treatment of distal femoral comminuted fracture].

Authors:  Jinyou Shi; Yuzhou Xiao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

Review 5.  [Research on the nature of micromovement and the biomechanical staging of fracture healing].

Authors:  Jinyou Shi; Yuzhou Xiao; Min Wu; Jianzhong Guan
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-09-15

6.  Dynamic Fixation of Humeral Shaft Fractures Using Active Locking Plates: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Steven M Madey; Stanley Tsai; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Kathleen Earley; Michael Lutsch; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

7.  Effect of pillow height on the biomechanics of the head-neck complex: investigation of the cranio-cervical pressure and cervical spine alignment.

Authors:  Sicong Ren; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Hui Yang; Yan Zhou; Jin Lin; Ming Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Comparison of 4 Methods for Dynamization of Locking Plates: Differences in the Amount and Type of Fracture Motion.

Authors:  Julia Henschel; Stanley Tsai; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; J Lawrence Marsh; Steven M Madey; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Virtual Simulation for Interactive Visualization of 3D Fracture Fixation Biomechanics.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Hwabok Wee; Jared Vicory; April D Armstrong; J Spence Reid
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 10.  Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Dominic Mischler; Hwabok Wee; J Spence Reid; Peter Varga
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.163

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.