Literature DB >> 25894254

Organosilicon phantom for photoacoustic imaging.

Cinzia Avigo1, Nicole Di Lascio2, Paolo Armanetti3, Claudia Kusmic1, Lucia Cavigli4, Fulvio Ratto4, Sandro Meucci5, Cecilia Masciullo6, Marco Cecchini6, Roberto Pini4, Francesco Faita1, Luca Menichetti7.   

Abstract

Photoacoustic imaging is an emerging technique. Although commercially available photoacoustic imaging systems currently exist, the technology is still in its infancy. Therefore, the design of stable phantoms is essential to achieve semiquantitative evaluation of the performance of a photoacoustic system and can help optimize the properties of contrast agents. We designed and developed a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) phantom with exceptionally fine geometry; the phantom was tested using photoacoustic experiments loaded with the standard indocyanine green dye and compared to an agar phantom pattern through polyethylene glycol-gold nanorods. The linearity of the photoacoustic signal with the nanoparticle number was assessed. The signal-tonoiseratio and contrast were employed as image quality parameters, and enhancements of up to 50 and up to 300%, respectively, were measured with the PDMS phantom with respect to the agar one. A tissue-mimicking (TM)-PDMS was prepared by adding TiO2 and India ink; photoacoustic tests were performed in order to compare the signal generated by the TM-PDMS and the biological tissue. The PDMS phantom can become a particularly promising tool in the field of photoacoustics for the evaluation of the performance of a PA system and as a model of the structure of vascularized soft tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25894254     DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.20.4.046008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  8 in total

1.  Biologically relevant photoacoustic imaging phantoms with tunable optical and acoustic properties.

Authors:  William C Vogt; Congxian Jia; Keith A Wear; Brian S Garra; T Joshua Pfefer
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Dynamic blood flow phantom with negative and positive photoacoustic contrasts.

Authors:  Hind J Jawad; Mustafa Sarimollaoglu; Alexandru S Biris; Vladimir P Zharov
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Tissue-mimicking phantoms for performance evaluation of photoacoustic microscopy systems.

Authors:  Hsun-Chia Hsu; Keith A Wear; T Joshua Pfefer; William C Vogt
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  The development and characterization of a novel yet simple 3D printed tool to facilitate phantom imaging of photoacoustic contrast agents.

Authors:  Santiago J Arconada-Alvarez; Jeanne E Lemaster; Junxin Wang; Jesse V Jokerst
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2017-02-10

5.  Dynamic blood flow phantom for in vivo liquid biopsy standardization.

Authors:  Anastasiia Kozlova; Daniil Bratashov; Oleg Grishin; Arkadii Abdurashitov; Ekaterina Prikhozhdenko; Roman Verkhovskii; Natalia Shushunova; Evgeny Shashkov; Vladimir P Zharov; Olga Inozemtseva
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Polydimethylsiloxane tissue-mimicking phantoms with tunable optical properties.

Authors:  Aaron M Goldfain; Paul Lemaillet; David W Allen; Kimberly A Briggman; Jeeseong Hwang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 3.758

Review 7.  Review of consensus test methods in medical imaging and current practices in photoacoustic image quality assessment.

Authors:  Jorge Palma-Chavez; T Joshua Pfefer; Anant Agrawal; Jesse V Jokerst; William C Vogt
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Photoacoustic imaging phantoms for assessment of object detectability and boundary buildup artifacts.

Authors:  Jorge Palma-Chavez; Keith A Wear; Yash Mantri; Jesse V Jokerst; William C Vogt
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2022-03-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.