Literature DB >> 26886495

The "parts and wholes" of face recognition: A review of the literature.

James W Tanaka1, Diana Simonyi1.   

Abstract

It has been claimed that faces are recognized as a "whole" rather than by the recognition of individual parts. In a paper published in the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology in 1993, Martha Farah and I attempted to operationalize the holistic claim using the part/whole task. In this task, participants studied a face and then their memory presented in isolation and in the whole face. Consistent with the holistic view, recognition of the part was superior when tested in the whole-face condition compared to when it was tested in isolation. The "whole face" or holistic advantage was not found for faces that were inverted, or scrambled, nor for non-face objects, suggesting that holistic encoding was specific to normal, intact faces. In this paper, we reflect on the part/whole paradigm and how it has contributed to our understanding of what it means to recognize a face as a "whole" stimulus. We describe the value of part/whole task for developing theories of holistic and non-holistic recognition of faces and objects. We discuss the research that has probed the neural substrates of holistic processing in healthy adults and people with prosopagnosia and autism. Finally, we examine how experience shapes holistic face recognition in children and recognition of own- and other-race faces in adults. The goal of this article is to summarize the research on the part/whole task and speculate on how it has informed our understanding of holistic face processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autism; Face recognition; Holistic; Other-race face recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26886495      PMCID: PMC5051945          DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1146780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  67 in total

1.  Paradoxical configuration effects for faces and objects in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  B de Gelder; R Rouw
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Show me the features! Understanding recognition from the use of visual information.

Authors:  Philippe G Schyns; Lizann Bonnar; Frédéric Gosselin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

3.  A normed study of face recognition in autism and related disorders.

Authors:  A Klin; S S Sparrow; A de Bildt; D V Cicchetti; D J Cohen; F R Volkmar
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1999-12

4.  Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation.

Authors:  Richard Le Grand; Catherine J Mondloch; Daphne Maurer; Henry P Brent
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-11

5.  Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  K Tanaka; H Saito; Y Fukada; M Moriya
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  G McCarthy; A Puce; A Belger; T Allison
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.

Authors:  A Freire; K Lee; L A Symons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Training with own-race faces can improve processing of other-race faces: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Joseph DeGutis; Christopher DeNicola; Tyler Zink; Regina McGlinchey; William Milberg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 9.  Impaired face processing in autism: fact or artifact?

Authors:  Boutheina Jemel; Laurent Mottron; Michelle Dawson
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2006-01

10.  Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex.

Authors:  D I Perrett; E T Rolls; W Caan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  25 in total

1.  Bidirectional electric communication between the inferior occipital gyrus and the amygdala during face processing.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Shota Uono; Kazumi Matsuda; Keiko Usui; Naotaka Usui; Yushi Inoue; Motomi Toichi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Different measures of holistic face processing tap into distinct but partially overlapping mechanisms.

Authors:  Isabelle Boutet; Elizabeth A Nelson; Nicholas Watier; Denis Cousineau; Sébastien Béland; Charles A Collin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The effects of face inversion on perceiving- and sensing-based change detection.

Authors:  Robin I Goodrich; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-05-13

4.  Does the implicit models of leadership influence the scanning of other-race faces in adults?

Authors:  Iain L Densten; Luc Borrowman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Expertise with unfamiliar objects is flexible to changes in task but not changes in class.

Authors:  Rachel A Searston; Jason M Tangen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Featural and Spacing Processing for Face and Non-face Stimuli.

Authors:  Marcello Negrini; Diandra Brkić; Sara Pizzamiglio; Isabella Premoli; Davide Rivolta
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-13

7.  Context Modulates Congruency Effects in Selective Attention to Social Cues.

Authors:  Andrea Ravagli; Francesco Marini; Barbara F M Marino; Paola Ricciardelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-12

8.  Mapping the Featural and Holistic Face Processing of Bad and Good Face Recognizers.

Authors:  Tessa Marzi; Giorgio Gronchi; Maria Teresa Turano; Fabio Giovannelli; Fiorenza Giganti; Mohamed Rebai; Maria Pia Viggiano
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-13

9.  Inversion effects in the expert classification of mammograms and faces.

Authors:  Michael D Chin; Karla K Evans; Jeremy M Wolfe; Jonathan Bowen; James W Tanaka
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-08-15

10.  Face recognition ability does not predict person identification performance: using individual data in the interpretation of group results.

Authors:  Eilidh Noyes; Matthew Q Hill; Alice J O'Toole
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.