Literature DB >> 10450889

Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex.

G McCarthy1, A Puce, A Belger, T Allison.   

Abstract

In the previous paper the locations and basic response properties of N200 and other face-specific event-related potentials (ERPs) were described. In this paper responsiveness of N200 and related ERPs to the perceptual features of faces and other images was assessed. N200 amplitude did not vary substantially, whether evoked by colored or grayscale faces; normal, blurred or line-drawing faces; or by faces of different sizes. Human hands evoked small N200s at face-specific sites, but evoked hand-specific ERPs at other sites. Cat and dog faces evoked N200s that were 73% as large as to human faces. Hemifield stimulation demonstrated that the right hemisphere is better at processing information about upright faces and transferring it to the left hemisphere, whereas the left hemisphere is better at processing information about inverted faces and transferring it to the right hemisphere. N200 amplitude was largest to full faces and decreased progressively to eyes, face contours, lips and noses viewed in isolation. A region just lateral to face-specific N200 sites was more responsive to internal face parts than to faces, and some sites in ventral occipitotemporal cortex were face-part-specific. Faces with eyes averted or closed evoked larger N200s than those evoked by faces with eyes forward. N200 amplitude and latency were affected by the joint effects of eye and head position in the right but not in the left hemisphere. Full and three-quarter views of faces evoked larger N200s than did profile views. The results are discussed in relation to behavioral studies in humans and single-cell recordings in monkeys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10450889     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/9.5.431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  111 in total

1.  An intracranial event-related potential study on transformational apparent motion. Does its neural processing differ from real motion?

Authors:  Josie-Anne Bertrand; Maryse Lassonde; Manon Robert; Dang Khoa Nguyen; Armando Bertone; Marie-Ève Doucet; Alain Bouthillier; Franco Lepore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Stimulus repetition and hemodynamic response refractoriness in event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Chun-Siong Soon; Vinod Venkatraman; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Processing faces and facial expressions.

Authors:  Mette T Posamentier; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Seeing faces in the noise: stochastic activity in perceptual regions of the brain may influence the perception of ambiguous stimuli.

Authors:  Heather A Wild; Thomas A Busey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

5.  The role of eyes in early face processing: a rapid adaptation study of the inversion effect.

Authors:  Dan Nemrodov; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2011-05-23

6.  Neural tuning for face wholes and parts in human fusiform gyrus revealed by FMRI adaptation.

Authors:  Alison Harris; Geoffrey Karl Aguirre
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Single-trial analysis of neuroimaging data: inferring neural networks underlying perceptual decision-making in the human brain.

Authors:  Paul Sajda; Marios G Philiastides; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009

8.  Individual differences in FFA activity suggest independent processing at different spatial scales.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Kim M Curby; Pawel Skudlarski; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Enhanced extrastriate visual response to bandpass spatial frequency filtered fearful faces: time course and topographic evoked-potentials mapping.

Authors:  Gilles Pourtois; Elise S Dan; Didier Grandjean; David Sander; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Piecing it together: infants' neural responses to face and object structure.

Authors:  Faraz Farzin; Chuan Hou; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.