Literature DB >> 26880390

Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Diabetes Treatment Decisions.

Jessica R Castle1, Peter G Jacobs2.   

Abstract

While self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is the current standard used by people with diabetes to manage glucose levels, recent improvements in accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology are making it very likely that diabetes-related treatment decisions will soon be made based on CGM values alone. Nonadjunctive use of CGM will lead to a paradigm shift in how patients manage their glucose levels and will require substantial changes in how care providers educate their patients, monitor their progress, and provide feedback to help them manage their diabetes. The approval to use CGM nonadjunctively is also a critical step in the pathway toward FDA approval of an artificial pancreas system, which is further expected to transform diabetes care for people with type 1 diabetes. In this article, we discuss how nonadjunctive CGM is expected to soon replace routine SMBG and how this new usage scenario is expected to transform health outcomes and patient care.
© 2016 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial pancreas; continuous glucose monitoring; type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26880390      PMCID: PMC5032939          DOI: 10.1177/1932296816631569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  36 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: sources of errors in measurement.

Authors:  Barry H Ginsberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

Review 2.  Biomechanics of the sensor-tissue interface-effects of motion, pressure, and design on sensor performance and foreign body response-part II: examples and application.

Authors:  Kristen L Helton; Buddy D Ratner; Natalie A Wisniewski
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

3.  Pathway to artificial pancreas systems revisited: moving downstream.

Authors:  Aaron Kowalski
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry.

Authors:  Kellee M Miller; Nicole C Foster; Roy W Beck; Richard M Bergenstal; Stephanie N DuBose; Linda A DiMeglio; David M Maahs; William V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Comparison of dual-hormone artificial pancreas, single-hormone artificial pancreas, and conventional insulin pump therapy for glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: an open-label randomised controlled crossover trial.

Authors:  Ahmad Haidar; Laurent Legault; Virginie Messier; Tina Maria Mitre; Catherine Leroux; Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 32.069

6.  The effect of rising vs. falling glucose level on amperometric glucose sensor lag and accuracy in Type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  W K Ward; J M Engle; D Branigan; J El Youssef; R G Massoud; J R Castle
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  Perceived accuracy in continuous glucose monitoring: understanding the impact on patients.

Authors:  William H Polonsky; Danielle Hessler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-10

8.  Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Richard M Bergenstal; David C Klonoff; Satish K Garg; Bruce W Bode; Melissa Meredith; Robert H Slover; Andrew J Ahmann; John B Welsh; Scott W Lee; Francine R Kaufman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Time lag of glucose from intravascular to interstitial compartment in humans.

Authors:  Ananda Basu; Simmi Dube; Michael Slama; Isabel Errazuriz; Jose Carlos Amezcua; Yogish C Kudva; Thomas Peyser; Rickey E Carter; Claudio Cobelli; Rita Basu
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  Effect of acetaminophen on CGM glucose in an outpatient setting.

Authors:  David M Maahs; Daniel DeSalvo; Laura Pyle; Trang Ly; Laurel Messer; Paula Clinton; Emily Westfall; R Paul Wadwa; Bruce Buckingham
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Closing the Loop.

Authors:  Revital Nimri; Nathan Murray; Alexander Ochs; Jordan E Pinsker; Eyal Dassau
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Identifiability Analysis of Three Control-Oriented Models for Use in Artificial Pancreas Systems.

Authors:  Jose Garcia-Tirado; Christian Zuluaga-Bedoya; Marc D Breton
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-10

3.  Suicide and Self-inflicted Injury in Diabetes: A Balancing Act.

Authors:  Katharine D Barnard-Kelly; Diana Naranjo; Shideh Majidi; Halis K Akturk; Marc Breton; Philippe Courtet; Emilie Olié; Rayhan A Lal; Nicole Johnson; Eric Renard
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-12-04

4.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Current Use in Diabetes Management and Possible Future Applications.

Authors:  Martina Vettoretti; Giacomo Cappon; Giada Acciaroli; Andrea Facchinetti; Giovanni Sparacino
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-05-22

5.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Informed Advisory System with Automated Titration and Dosing of Insulin Reduces Glucose Variability in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Marc D Breton; Stephen D Patek; Dayu Lv; Elaine Schertz; Jessica Robic; Jennifer Pinnata; Laura Kollar; Charlotte Barnett; Christian Wakeman; Mary Oliveri; Chiara Fabris; Daniel Chernavvsky; Boris P Kovatchev; Stacey M Anderson
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 6.  Practical Considerations on the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pediatrics and Older Adults and Nonadjunctive Use.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Nicholas B Argento; Lori M Laffel
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 7.  How Can We Realize the Clinical Benefits of Continuous Glucose Monitoring?

Authors:  Ramzi A Ajjan
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  3D CoMoO4 nanoflake arrays decorated disposable pencil graphite electrode for selective and sensitive enzyme-less electrochemical glucose sensors.

Authors:  N Priyanga; K Sasikumar; A Sahaya Raja; Mehboobali Pannipara; Abdullah G Al-Sehemi; R Jude Vimal Michael; M Praveen Kumar; A Therasa Alphonsa; G Gnana Kumar
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 5.833

9.  Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Dessi P Zaharieva; Kamuran Turksoy; Sarah M McGaugh; Rubin Pooni; Todd Vienneau; Trang Ly; Michael C Riddell
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  In Silico Analysis of an Exercise-Safe Artificial Pancreas With Multistage Model Predictive Control and Insulin Safety System.

Authors:  Jose Garcia-Tirado; Patricio Colmegna; John P Corbett; Basak Ozaslan; Marc D Breton
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.