Kelli Stidham Hall1, Elizabeth Ela2, Melissa K Zochowski3, Amy Caldwell4, Michelle Moniz3, Laura McAndrew5, Monique Steel5, Sneha Challa3, Vanessa K Dalton3, Susan Ernst6. 1. Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, GCR 560, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Electronic address: kelli.s.hall@emory.edu. 2. Population Studies Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA. 5. University Health Service, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 6. University Health Service, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess multiple dimensions of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) knowledge and perceived multi-level barriers to LARC use among a sample of college women. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an Internet-based study of 1982 female undergraduates at a large mid-western university. Our 55-item survey used a multi-level framework to measure young women's understanding of, experiences with intrauterine devices (IUD) and implants and their perceived barriers to LARC at individual, health systems and community levels. The survey included a 20-item knowledge scale. We estimated and compared LARC knowledge scores and barriers using descriptive, bivariate and linear regression statistics. RESULTS: Few college women had used (5%) or heard of (22%) LARC, and most self-reported "little" or "no" knowledge of IUDs (79%) and implants (88%). Women answered 50% of LARC knowledge items correctly (mean 10.4, range 0-20), and scores differed across sociodemographic groups (p values<.04). Factors associated with scores in multivariable models included race/ethnicity, program year, sorority participation, religious affiliation and service attendance, employment status, sexual orientation and contraceptive history. Perceived barriers to IUDs included the following: not wanting a foreign object in body (44%), not knowing enough about the method (42%), preferring a "controllable" method (42%), cost (27%), and not being in a long-term relationship (23%). Implant results were similar. "Not knowing enough" was women's primary reason for IUD (18%) and implant (22%) nonuse. CONCLUSION: Lack of knowledge (both perceived and actual) was the most common barrier among many perceived individual-, systems- and community-level factors precluding these college women's LARC use. Findings can inform innovative, multi-level interventions to improve understanding, acceptability and uptake of LARC on campuses. IMPLICATIONS: Lack of knowledge of IUDs and implants served as a primary barrier to highly effective contraceptive use among these college women. Comprehensive, patient-centered and multi-level educational public health strategies are needed to promote positive campus climates around LARC and improve family planning outcomes among this substantial reproductive-aged population.
OBJECTIVE: To assess multiple dimensions of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) knowledge and perceived multi-level barriers to LARC use among a sample of college women. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an Internet-based study of 1982 female undergraduates at a large mid-western university. Our 55-item survey used a multi-level framework to measure young women's understanding of, experiences with intrauterine devices (IUD) and implants and their perceived barriers to LARC at individual, health systems and community levels. The survey included a 20-item knowledge scale. We estimated and compared LARC knowledge scores and barriers using descriptive, bivariate and linear regression statistics. RESULTS: Few college women had used (5%) or heard of (22%) LARC, and most self-reported "little" or "no" knowledge of IUDs (79%) and implants (88%). Women answered 50% of LARC knowledge items correctly (mean 10.4, range 0-20), and scores differed across sociodemographic groups (p values<.04). Factors associated with scores in multivariable models included race/ethnicity, program year, sorority participation, religious affiliation and service attendance, employment status, sexual orientation and contraceptive history. Perceived barriers to IUDs included the following: not wanting a foreign object in body (44%), not knowing enough about the method (42%), preferring a "controllable" method (42%), cost (27%), and not being in a long-term relationship (23%). Implant results were similar. "Not knowing enough" was women's primary reason for IUD (18%) and implant (22%) nonuse. CONCLUSION: Lack of knowledge (both perceived and actual) was the most common barrier among many perceived individual-, systems- and community-level factors precluding these college women's LARC use. Findings can inform innovative, multi-level interventions to improve understanding, acceptability and uptake of LARC on campuses. IMPLICATIONS: Lack of knowledge of IUDs and implants served as a primary barrier to highly effective contraceptive use among these college women. Comprehensive, patient-centered and multi-level educational public health strategies are needed to promote positive campus climates around LARC and improve family planning outcomes among this substantial reproductive-aged population.
Authors: Brooke Winner; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Christina Buckel; Tessa Madden; Jenifer E Allsworth; Gina M Secura Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Crystal P Tyler; Maura K Whiteman; Lauren B Zapata; Kathryn M Curtis; Susan D Hillis; Polly A Marchbanks Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Gina M Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Jennifer L Mullersman; Jeffrey F Peipert Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Catalina N Rey; Gary J Badger; Heidi S Melbostad; Deborah Wachtel; Stacey C Sigmon; Lauren K MacAfee; Anne K Dougherty; Sarah H Heil Journal: Contraception Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Mikaela A Kelly; Eraka P Bath; Sarah M Godoy; Laura S Abrams; Elizabeth S Barnert Journal: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 1.814
Authors: Brittany M Charlton; Elizabeth Janiak; Audrey J Gaskins; Amy D DiVasta; Rachel K Jones; Stacey A Missmer; Jorge E Chavarro; Vishnudas Sarda; Margaret Rosario; S Bryn Austin Journal: Contraception Date: 2019-05-11 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Rachel G Logan; Erika L Thompson; Cheryl A Vamos; Stacey B Griner; Coralia Vázquez-Otero; Ellen M Daley Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2018-11