Literature DB >> 26868367

Not the End of the Odyssey: Parental Perceptions of Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) in Pediatric Undiagnosed Disorders.

Allyn McConkie Rosell1, Loren D M Pena2, Kelly Schoch2, Rebecca Spillmann2, Jennifer Sullivan2, Stephen R Hooper3, Yong-Hui Jiang2, Nicolas Mathey-Andrews2, David B Goldstein4, Vandana Shashi2.   

Abstract

Due to the lack of empirical information on parental perceptions of primary results of whole exome sequencing (WES), we conducted a retrospective semi-structured interview with 19 parents of children who had undergone WES. Perceptions explored during the interview included factors that would contribute to parental empowerment such as: parental expectations, understanding of the WES and results, utilization of the WES information, and communication of findings to health/educational professionals and family members. Results of the WES had previously been communicated to families within a novel framework of clinical diagnostic categories: 5/19 had Definite diagnoses, 6/19 had Likely diagnoses, 3/19 had Possible diagnosis and 5/19 had No diagnosis. All parents interviewed expressed a sense of duty to pursue the WES in search of a diagnosis; however, their expectations were tempered by previous experiences with negative genetic testing results. Approximately half the parents worried that a primary diagnosis that would be lethal might be identified; however, the hope of a diagnosis outweighed this concern. Parents were accurately able to summarize their child's WES findings, understood the implications for recurrence risks, and were able to communicate these findings to family and medical/educational providers. The majority of those with a Definite/Likely diagnosis felt that their child's medical care was more focused, or there was a reduction in worry, despite the lack of a specific treatment. Irrespective of diagnostic outcome, parents recommended that follow-up visits be built into the process. Several parents expressed a desire to have all variants of unknown significance (VUS) reported to them so that they could investigate these themselves. Finally, for some families whose children had a Definite/Likely diagnosis, there was remaining frustration and a sense of isolation, due to the limited information that was available about the diagnosed rare disorders and the inability to connect to other families, suggesting that for families with rare genetic disorders, the diagnostic odyssey does not necessarily end with a diagnosis. Qualitative interviewing served a meaningful role in eliciting new information about parental motivations, expectations, and knowledge of WES. Our findings highlight a need for continued communication with families as we navigate the new landscape of genomic sequencing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empowerment; Genetic counseling; Parental perspectives; Whole exome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26868367     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9933-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  33 in total

1.  Genetic Counseling-Stress, Coping, and the Empowerment Perspective.

Authors:  A McConkie-Rosell; J A Sullivan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Disclosure of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing in pediatric genomic research.

Authors:  Ruqayyah Abdul-Karim; Benjamin E Berkman; David Wendler; Annette Rid; Javed Khan; Tom Badgett; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  You never call, you never write: why return of 'omic' results to research participants is both a good idea and a moral imperative.

Authors:  Misha Angrist
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  The Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale: a new patient-reported outcome measure for clinical genetics services.

Authors:  M McAllister; A M Wood; G Dunn; S Shiloh; C Todd
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Evaluating a counselling strategy for diagnostic WES in paediatric neurology: an exploration of parents' information and communication needs.

Authors:  L Krabbenborg; J Schieving; T Kleefstra; L E L M Vissers; M A Willemsen; J A Veltman; S van der Burg
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 7.  Unlocking Mendelian disease using exome sequencing.

Authors:  Christian Gilissen; Alexander Hoischen; Han G Brunner; Joris A Veltman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Whole-exome sequencing in undiagnosed genetic diseases: interpreting 119 trios.

Authors:  Xiaolin Zhu; Slavé Petrovski; Pingxing Xie; Elizabeth K Ruzzo; Yi-Fan Lu; K Melodi McSweeney; Bruria Ben-Zeev; Andreea Nissenkorn; Yair Anikster; Danit Oz-Levi; Ryan S Dhindsa; Yuki Hitomi; Kelly Schoch; Rebecca C Spillmann; Gali Heimer; Dina Marek-Yagel; Michal Tzadok; Yujun Han; Gordon Worley; Jennifer Goldstein; Yong-Hui Jiang; Doron Lancet; Elon Pras; Vandana Shashi; Duncan McHale; Anna C Need; David B Goldstein
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  The shifting model in clinical diagnostics: how next-generation sequencing and families are altering the way rare diseases are discovered, studied, and treated.

Authors:  Matthew Might; Matt Wilsey
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Sustained therapeutic response to riboflavin in a child with a progressive neurological condition, diagnosed by whole-exome sequencing.

Authors:  Vandana Shashi; Slavé Petrovski; Kelly Schoch; Rebecca Crimian; Laura E Case; Roha Khalid; Maysantoine A El-Dairi; Yong-Hui Jiang; Mohamad A Mikati; David B Goldstein
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2015-10
View more
  32 in total

1.  The genome empowerment scale: An assessment of parental empowerment in families with undiagnosed disease.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Kelly Schoch; Jennifer Sullivan; Heidi Cope; Rebecca Spillmann; Christina G S Palmer; Loren Pena; Yong-Hui Jiang; Nicole Daniels; Nicole Walley; Khoon G Tan; Stephen R Hooper; Vandana Shashi
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Psychosocial Profiles of Parents of Children with Undiagnosed Diseases: Managing Well or Just Managing?

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Stephen R Hooper; Loren D M Pena; Kelly Schoch; Rebecca C Spillmann; Yong-Hui Jiang; Heidi Cope; Christina Palmer; Vandana Shashi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Using the diffusion of innovations model to guide participant engagement in the genomics era.

Authors:  Katie L Lewis; Flavia M Facio; Courtney D Berrios
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Diagnostic exome sequencing in children: A survey of parental understanding, experience and psychological impact.

Authors:  J Wynn; R Ottman; J Duong; A L Wilson; P Ahimaz; J Martinez; R Rabin; E Rosen; R Webster; C Au; M T Cho; C Egan; E Guzman; M Primiano; J E Shaw; R Sisson; R L Klitzman; P S Appelbaum; U Lichter-Konecki; K Anyane-Yeboa; A Iglesias; W K Chung
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Impact of Receiving Secondary Results from Genomic Research: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Julia Wynn; Josue Martinez; Jessica Bulafka; Jimmy Duong; Yuan Zhang; Codruta Chiuzan; Jain Preti; Maria L Cremona; Vaidehi Jobanputra; Abby J Fyer; Robert L Klitzman; Paul S Appelbaum; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  How do providers discuss the results of pediatric exome sequencing with families?

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Allison Werner-Lin; Rebecca Mueller; Victoria A Miller; Sawona Biswas; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Psychological outcomes related to exome and genome sequencing result disclosure: a meta-analysis of seven Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium studies.

Authors:  Jill O Robinson; Julia Wynn; Barbara Biesecker; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara Bernhardt; Kyle B Brothers; Wendy K Chung; Kurt D Christensen; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire; M Ragan Hart; Ida Griesemer; Donald L Patrick; Christine Rini; David Veenstra; Angel M Cronin; Stacy W Gray
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 8.  Genetic Counseling and Genome Sequencing in Pediatric Rare Disease.

Authors:  Alison M Elliott
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 6.915

9.  Exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability: an evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Kandamurugu Manickam; Monica R McClain; Laurie A Demmer; Sawona Biswas; Hutton M Kearney; Jennifer Malinowski; Lauren J Massingham; Danny Miller; Timothy W Yu; Fuki M Hisama
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Clinical application of a scale to assess genomic healthcare empowerment (GEmS): Process and illustrative case examples.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Kelly Schoch; Jennifer Sullivan; Rebecca C Spillmann; Heidi Cope; Queenie K-G Tan; Christina G S Palmer; Stephen R Hooper; Vandana Shashi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.