Literature DB >> 26866996

Demonstrating an Order-of-Magnitude Sampling Enhancement in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Complex Protein Systems.

Albert C Pan1, Thomas M Weinreich1, Stefano Piana1, David E Shaw1,2.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can describe protein motions in atomic detail, but transitions between protein conformational states sometimes take place on time scales that are infeasible or very expensive to reach by direct simulation. Enhanced sampling methods, the aim of which is to increase the sampling efficiency of MD simulations, have thus been extensively employed. The effectiveness of such methods when applied to complex biological systems like proteins, however, has been difficult to establish because even enhanced sampling simulations of such systems do not typically reach time scales at which convergence is extensive enough to reliably quantify sampling efficiency. Here, we obtain sufficiently converged simulations of three proteins to evaluate the performance of simulated tempering, a member of a widely used class of enhanced sampling methods that use elevated temperature to accelerate sampling. Simulated tempering simulations with individual lengths of up to 100 μs were compared to (previously published) conventional MD simulations with individual lengths of up to 1 ms. With two proteins, BPTI and ubiquitin, we evaluated the efficiency of sampling of conformational states near the native state, and for the third, the villin headpiece, we examined the rate of folding and unfolding. Our comparisons demonstrate that simulated tempering can consistently achieve a substantial sampling speedup of an order of magnitude or more relative to conventional MD.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26866996     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  30 in total

1.  A generalized linear response framework for expanded ensemble and replica exchange simulations.

Authors:  Brian K Radak; Donghyuk Suh; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Computer Folding of RNA Tetraloops: Identification of Key Force Field Deficiencies.

Authors:  Petra Kührová; Robert B Best; Sandro Bottaro; Giovanni Bussi; Jiří Šponer; Michal Otyepka; Pavel Banáš
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Modulation of Amyloid-β42 Conformation by Small Molecules Through Nonspecific Binding.

Authors:  Chungwen Liang; Sergey N Savinov; Jasna Fejzo; Stephen J Eyles; Jianhan Chen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Probing the Basis of α-Synuclein Aggregation by Comparing Simulations to Single-Molecule Experiments.

Authors:  Cassandra D M Churchill; Mark A Healey; Jordane Preto; Jack A Tuszynski; Michael T Woodside
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  RNA Structural Dynamics As Captured by Molecular Simulations: A Comprehensive Overview.

Authors:  Jiří Šponer; Giovanni Bussi; Miroslav Krepl; Pavel Banáš; Sandro Bottaro; Richard A Cunha; Alejandro Gil-Ley; Giovanni Pinamonti; Simón Poblete; Petr Jurečka; Nils G Walter; Michal Otyepka
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Cytosolic expression, solution structures, and molecular dynamics simulation of genetically encodable disulfide-rich de novo designed peptides.

Authors:  Garry W Buchko; Surya V S R K Pulavarti; Victor Ovchinnikov; Elizabeth A Shaw; Stephen A Rettie; Peter J Myler; Martin Karplus; Thomas Szyperski; David Baker; Christopher D Bahl
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Modeling the native ensemble of PhuS using enhanced sampling MD and HDX-ensemble reweighting.

Authors:  Kyle C Kihn; Tyree Wilson; Ally K Smith; Richard T Bradshaw; Patrick L Wintrode; Lucy R Forrest; Angela Wilks; Daniel J Deredge
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Molecular dynamics simulations of lipid nanodiscs.

Authors:  Mohsen Pourmousa; Richard W Pastor
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.747

9.  Assessment of the model refinement category in CASP12.

Authors:  Ladislav Hovan; Vladimiras Oleinikovas; Havva Yalinca; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Giorgio Saladino; Francesco Luigi Gervasio
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-11-29

10.  Can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of GPCR models?

Authors:  Jon Kapla; Ismael Rodríguez-Espigares; Flavio Ballante; Jana Selent; Jens Carlsson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.