Literature DB >> 30152054

Cytosolic expression, solution structures, and molecular dynamics simulation of genetically encodable disulfide-rich de novo designed peptides.

Garry W Buchko1,2,3, Surya V S R K Pulavarti4, Victor Ovchinnikov5, Elizabeth A Shaw4, Stephen A Rettie6, Peter J Myler1,7,8,9, Martin Karplus5,10, Thomas Szyperski4, David Baker6,11,12, Christopher D Bahl6,11,13.   

Abstract

Disulfide-rich peptides represent an important protein family with broad pharmacological potential. Recent advances in computational methods have made it possible to design new peptides which adopt a stable conformation de novo. Here, we describe a system to produce disulfide-rich de novo peptides using Escherichia coli as the expression host. The advantage of this system is that it enables production of uniformly 13 C- and 15 N-labeled peptides for solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies. This expression system was used to isotopically label two previously reported de novo designed peptides, and to determine their solution structures using NMR. The ensemble of NMR structures calculated for both peptides agreed well with the design models, further confirming the accuracy of the design protocol. Collection of NMR data on the peptides under reducing conditions revealed a dependency on disulfide bonds to maintain stability. Furthermore, we performed long-time molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with tempering to assess the stability of two families of de novo designed peptides. Initial designs which exhibited a stable structure during simulations were more likely to adopt a stable structure in vitro, but attempts to utilize this method to redesign unstable peptides to fold into a stable state were unsuccessful. Further work is therefore needed to assess the utility of MD simulation techniques for de novo protein design.
© 2018 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational protein design; de novo protein; disulfide-rich peptide; molecular dynamics simulation; nuclear magnetic resonance; protein purification; rosetta

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30152054      PMCID: PMC6194292          DOI: 10.1002/pro.3453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  33 in total

1.  An NMR approach to structural proteomics.

Authors:  Adelinda Yee; Xiaoqing Chang; Antonio Pineda-Lucena; Bin Wu; Anthony Semesi; Brian Le; Theresa Ramelot; Gregory M Lee; Sudeepa Bhattacharyya; Pablo Gutierrez; Aleksej Denisov; Chang-Hun Lee; John R Cort; Guennadi Kozlov; Jack Liao; Grzegorz Finak; Limin Chen; David Wishart; Weontae Lee; Lawrence P McIntosh; Kalle Gehring; Michael A Kennedy; Aled M Edwards; Cheryl H Arrowsmith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA.

Authors:  Torsten Herrmann; Peter Güntert; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Protein therapeutics: a summary and pharmacological classification.

Authors:  Benjamin Leader; Quentin J Baca; David E Golan
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 4.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Massively parallel de novo protein design for targeted therapeutics.

Authors:  Aaron Chevalier; Daniel-Adriano Silva; Gabriel J Rocklin; Derrick R Hicks; Renan Vergara; Patience Murapa; Steffen M Bernard; Lu Zhang; Kwok-Ho Lam; Guorui Yao; Christopher D Bahl; Shin-Ichiro Miyashita; Inna Goreshnik; James T Fuller; Merika T Koday; Cody M Jenkins; Tom Colvin; Lauren Carter; Alan Bohn; Cassie M Bryan; D Alejandro Fernández-Velasco; Lance Stewart; Min Dong; Xuhui Huang; Rongsheng Jin; Ian A Wilson; Deborah H Fuller; David Baker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The program XEASY for computer-supported NMR spectral analysis of biological macromolecules.

Authors:  C Bartels; T H Xia; M Billeter; P Güntert; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  13C NMR chemical shifts can predict disulfide bond formation.

Authors:  D Sharma; K Rajarathnam
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Identification of zinc-ligated cysteine residues based on 13Calpha and 13Cbeta chemical shift data.

Authors:  Gregory J Kornhaber; David Snyder; Hunter N B Moseley; Gaetano T Montelione
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology.

Authors:  G Cornilescu; F Delaglio; A Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA.

Authors:  P Güntert; C Mumenthaler; K Wüthrich
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  5 in total

1.  Integration of the Rosetta suite with the python software stack via reproducible packaging and core programming interfaces for distributed simulation.

Authors:  Alexander S Ford; Brian D Weitzner; Christopher D Bahl
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Structural diversity in the Mycobacteria DUF3349 superfamily.

Authors:  Garry W Buchko; Jan Abendroth; John I Robinson; Isabelle Q Phan; Peter J Myler; Thomas E Edwards
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  Toward complete rational control over protein structure and function through computational design.

Authors:  Jared Adolf-Bryfogle; Frank D Teets; Christopher D Bahl
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  In Silico Insights towards the Identification of NLRP3 Druggable Hot Spots.

Authors:  Nedra Mekni; Maria De Rosa; Chiara Cipollina; Maria Rita Gulotta; Giada De Simone; Jessica Lombino; Alessandro Padova; Ugo Perricone
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  De novo designed protein inhibitors of amyloid aggregation and seeding.

Authors:  Kevin A Murray; Carolyn J Hu; Sarah L Griner; Hope Pan; Jeannette T Bowler; Romany Abskharon; Gregory M Rosenberg; Xinyi Cheng; Paul M Seidler; David S Eisenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 12.779

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.