Literature DB >> 27438572

Computer Folding of RNA Tetraloops: Identification of Key Force Field Deficiencies.

Petra Kührová1, Robert B Best2, Sandro Bottaro3, Giovanni Bussi3, Jiří Šponer1,4, Michal Otyepka1,4, Pavel Banáš1,4.   

Abstract

The computer-aided folding of biomolecules, particularly RNAs, is one of the most difficult challenges in computational structural biology. RNA tetraloops are fundamental RNA motifs playing key roles in RNA folding and RNA-RNA and RNA-protein interactions. Although state-of-the-art Molecular Dynamics (MD) force fields correctly describe the native state of these tetraloops as a stable free-energy basin on the microsecond time scale, enhanced sampling techniques reveal that the native state is not the global free energy minimum, suggesting yet unidentified significant imbalances in the force fields. Here, we tested our ability to fold the RNA tetraloops in various force fields and simulation settings. We employed three different enhanced sampling techniques, namely, temperature replica exchange MD (T-REMD), replica exchange with solute tempering (REST2), and well-tempered metadynamics (WT-MetaD). We aimed to separate problems caused by limited sampling from those due to force-field inaccuracies. We found that none of the contemporary force fields is able to correctly describe folding of the 5'-GAGA-3' tetraloop over a range of simulation conditions. We thus aimed to identify which terms of the force field are responsible for this poor description of TL folding. We showed that at least two different imbalances contribute to this behavior, namely, overstabilization of base-phosphate and/or sugar-phosphate interactions and underestimated stability of the hydrogen bonding interaction in base pairing. The first artifact stabilizes the unfolded ensemble, while the second one destabilizes the folded state. The former problem might be partially alleviated by reparametrization of the van der Waals parameters of the phosphate oxygens suggested by Case et al., while in order to overcome the latter effect we suggest local potentials to better capture hydrogen bonding interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27438572      PMCID: PMC6169534          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  81 in total

1.  Escaping free-energy minima.

Authors:  Alessandro Laio; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Extensive molecular dynamics simulations showing that canonical G8 and protonated A38H+ forms are most consistent with crystal structures of hairpin ribozyme.

Authors:  Vojtech Mlýnský; Pavel Banás; Daniel Hollas; Kamila Réblová; Nils G Walter; Jirí Sponer; Michal Otyepka
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Microsecond-Scale MD Simulations of HIV-1 DIS Kissing-Loop Complexes Predict Bulged-In Conformation of the Bulged Bases and Reveal Interesting Differences between Available Variants of the AMBER RNA Force Fields.

Authors:  Marek Havrila; Marie Zgarbová; Petr Jurečka; Pavel Banáš; Miroslav Krepl; Michal Otyepka; Jiří Šponer
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Direct revelation of multiple conformations in RNA by femtosecond dynamics.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Tianbing Xia
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method.

Authors:  Alessandro Barducci; Giovanni Bussi; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Simulation of the pressure and temperature folding/unfolding equilibrium of a small RNA hairpin.

Authors:  Angel E Garcia; Dietmar Paschek
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Bent helix formation between RNA hairpins with complementary loops.

Authors:  J P Marino; R S Gregorian; G Csankovszki; D M Crothers
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Molecular mechanism of preQ1 riboswitch action: a molecular dynamics study.

Authors:  Pavel Banáš; Petr Sklenovský; Joseph E Wedekind; Jiří Šponer; Michal Otyepka
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Benchmarking AMBER force fields for RNA: comparisons to NMR spectra for single-stranded r(GACC) are improved by revised χ torsions.

Authors:  Ilyas Yildirim; Harry A Stern; Jason D Tubbs; Scott D Kennedy; Douglas H Turner
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.991

View more
  26 in total

1.  Polarizable force field for RNA based on the classical drude oscillator.

Authors:  Justin A Lemkul; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Development and Testing of the OPLS-AA/M Force Field for RNA.

Authors:  Michael J Robertson; Yue Qian; Matthew C Robinson; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Opportunities and Challenges in RNA Structural Modeling and Design.

Authors:  Tamar Schlick; Anna Marie Pyle
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Improving the Performance of the Amber RNA Force Field by Tuning the Hydrogen-Bonding Interactions.

Authors:  Petra Kührová; Vojtěch Mlýnský; Marie Zgarbová; Miroslav Krepl; Giovanni Bussi; Robert B Best; Michal Otyepka; Jiří Šponer; Pavel Banáš
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Mapping the Universe of RNA Tetraloop Folds.

Authors:  Sandro Bottaro; Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  RNA Structural Dynamics As Captured by Molecular Simulations: A Comprehensive Overview.

Authors:  Jiří Šponer; Giovanni Bussi; Miroslav Krepl; Pavel Banáš; Sandro Bottaro; Richard A Cunha; Alejandro Gil-Ley; Giovanni Pinamonti; Simón Poblete; Petr Jurečka; Nils G Walter; Michal Otyepka
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  AMOEBA Polarizable Atomic Multipole Force Field for Nucleic Acids.

Authors:  Changsheng Zhang; Chao Lu; Zhifeng Jing; Chuanjie Wu; Jean-Philip Piquemal; Jay W Ponder; Pengyu Ren
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 8.  New tricks for old dogs: improving the accuracy of biomolecular force fields by pair-specific corrections to non-bonded interactions.

Authors:  Jejoong Yoo; Aleksei Aksimentiev
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.676

9.  Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Reveals That GU Base Pairs Flanking Internal Loops Can Adopt Diverse Structures.

Authors:  Kyle D Berger; Scott D Kennedy; Douglas H Turner
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Insilico direct folding of thrombin-binding aptamer G-quadruplex at all-atom level.

Authors:  Changwon Yang; Mandar Kulkarni; Manho Lim; Youngshang Pak
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.