Literature DB >> 26865331

The use of a gas chromatography-sensor system combined with advanced statistical methods, towards the diagnosis of urological malignancies.

Raphael B M Aggio1, Ben de Lacy Costello, Paul White, Tanzeela Khalid, Norman M Ratcliffe, Raj Persad, Chris S J Probert.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is used to aid the selection of men undergoing biopsies. Its use remains controversial. We propose a GC-sensor algorithm system for classifying urine samples from patients with urological symptoms. This pilot study includes 155 men presenting to urology clinics, 58 were diagnosed with prostate cancer, 24 with bladder cancer and 73 with haematuria and or poor stream, without cancer. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to assess the discrimination achieved, while linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and support vector machine (SVM) were used as statistical models for sample classification. Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV), repeated 10-fold cross-validation (10FoldCV), repeated double cross-validation (DoubleCV) and Monte Carlo permutations were applied to assess performance. Significant separation was found between prostate cancer and control samples, bladder cancer and controls and between bladder and prostate cancer samples. For prostate cancer diagnosis, the GC/SVM system classified samples with 95% sensitivity and 96% specificity after LOOCV. For bladder cancer diagnosis, the SVM reported 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity after LOOCV, while the DoubleCV reported 87% sensitivity and 99% specificity, with SVM showing 78% and 98% sensitivity between prostate and bladder cancer samples. Evaluation of the results of the Monte Carlo permutation of class labels obtained chance-like accuracy values around 50% suggesting the observed results for bladder cancer and prostate cancer detection are not due to over fitting. The results of the pilot study presented here indicate that the GC system is able to successfully identify patterns that allow classification of urine samples from patients with urological cancers. An accurate diagnosis based on urine samples would reduce the number of negative prostate biopsies performed, and the frequency of surveillance cystoscopy for bladder cancer patients. Larger cohort studies are planned to investigate the potential of this system. Future work may lead to non-invasive breath analyses for diagnosing urological conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26865331      PMCID: PMC4876927          DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/10/1/017106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breath Res        ISSN: 1752-7155            Impact factor:   3.262


  54 in total

1.  Early prostate cancer antigen-2: a controversial prostate cancer biomarker?

Authors:  Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Evaluation of a gas sensor array and pattern recognition for the identification of bladder cancer from urine headspace.

Authors:  Christina M Weber; Michael Cauchi; Mitesh Patel; Conrad Bessant; Claire Turner; Lezlie E Britton; Carolyn M Willis
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.616

3.  Detection of bladder cancer using a point-of-care proteomic assay.

Authors:  H Barton Grossman; Edward Messing; Mark Soloway; Kevin Tomera; Giora Katz; Yitzhak Berger; Yu Shen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  The scent of disease: volatile organic compounds of the human body related to disease and disorder.

Authors:  Mika Shirasu; Kazushige Touhara
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.387

5.  How does initial treatment choice affect short-term and long-term costs for clinically localized prostate cancer?

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Kevin D Frick; Amanda L Blackford; Robert J Herbert; Bridget A Neville; Michael A Carducci; Craig C Earle
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Comparative effectiveness review: prostate cancer antigen 3 testing for the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Linda A Bradley; Glenn E Palomaki; Steven Gutman; David Samson; Naomi Aronson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Comparison of percent free PSA, PSA density, and age-specific PSA cutoffs for prostate cancer detection and staging.

Authors:  W J Catalona; P C Southwick; K M Slawin; A W Partin; M K Brawer; R C Flanigan; A Patel; J P Richie; P C Walsh; P T Scardino; P H Lange; G H Gasior; K G Loveland; K R Bray
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoforms for the detection of prostate cancer in men with a PSA level of 2-10 ng/ml: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew W Roddam; Michael J Duffy; Freddie C Hamdy; Anthony Milford Ward; Julietta Patnick; Christopher P Price; Janet Rimmer; Cathie Sturgeon; Peter White; Naomi E Allen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives significantly improve prediction of prostate cancer at initial biopsy in a total PSA range of 2-10 ng/ml: a multicentric European study.

Authors:  Massimo Lazzeri; Alexander Haese; Alexandre de la Taille; Joan Palou Redorta; Thomas McNicholas; Giovanni Lughezzani; Vincenzo Scattoni; Vittorio Bini; Massimo Freschi; Amy Sussman; Bijan Ghaleh; Philippe Le Corvoisier; Josep Alberola Bou; Salvador Esquena Fernández; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Performance characteristics of multiple urinary tumor markers and sample collection techniques in the detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Jalaluddin Bhuiyan; Javed Akhter; Dennis J O'Kane
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.786

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Canine olfaction as an alternative to analytical instruments for disease diagnosis: understanding 'dog personality' to achieve reproducible results.

Authors:  Klaus Hackner; Joachim Pleil
Journal:  J Breath Res       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.262

Review 2.  Prostate cancer detection: a systematic review of urinary biosensors.

Authors:  Kit Man Chan; Jonathan M Gleadle; Michael O'Callaghan; Krasimir Vasilev; Melanie MacGregor
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Investigation of urinary volatile organic compounds as novel diagnostic and surveillance biomarkers of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Lauren Lett; Michael George; Rachael Slater; Ben De Lacy Costello; Norman Ratcliffe; Marta García-Fiñana; Henry Lazarowicz; Chris Probert
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 9.075

Review 4.  Innovative Diagnostic Methods for Early Prostate Cancer Detection through Urine Analysis: A Review.

Authors:  Carmen Bax; Gianluigi Taverna; Lidia Eusebio; Selena Sironi; Fabio Grizzi; Giorgio Guazzoni; Laura Capelli
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Drift compensation on electronic nose data for non-invasive diagnosis of prostate cancer by urine analysis.

Authors:  Carmen Bax; Stefano Prudenza; Giulia Gaspari; Laura Capelli; Fabio Grizzi; Gianluigi Taverna
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  Optimization of training and measurement protocol for eNose analysis of urine headspace aimed at prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Laura Capelli; Carmen Bax; Fabio Grizzi; Gianluigi Taverna
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A targeted metabolomic protocol for quantitative analysis of volatile organic compounds in urine of children with celiac disease.

Authors:  Natalia Drabińska; Hafiz Abdul Azeem; Urszula Krupa-Kozak
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  Accuracy of a new electronic nose for prostate cancer diagnosis in urine samples.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Fabio Grizzi; Lorenzo Tidu; Carmen Bax; Matteo Zanoni; Paolo Vota; Beatrice Julia Lotesoriere; Stefano Prudenza; Luca Magagnin; Giacomo Langfelder; Nicolò Buffi; Paolo Casale; Laura Capelli
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.896

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.