OBJECTIVES: Various methods have been proposed to increase the specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), including age-specific PSA reference ranges, PSA density (PSAD), and percent free PSA (%fPSA). In this multicenter study, we compared these methods for their utility in cancer detection and their ability to predict pathologic stage after radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized, Stage T1c cancer. METHODS: Seven hundred seventy-three men (379 with prostate cancer, 394 with benign prostatic disease), 50 to 75 years old, from seven medical centers were enrolled in this prospective blinded study. All subjects had a palpably benign prostate, PSA 4.0 to 10.0 ng/mL, and a histologically confirmed diagnosis. Hybritech's Tandem PSA and free PSA assays were used. RESULTS: %fPSA and age-specific PSA cutoffs enhanced PSA specificity for cancer detection, but %fPSA maintained significantly higher sensitivities. Age-specific PSA cutoffs missed 20% to 60% of cancers in men older than 60 years of age. %fPSA and PSAD performed equally well for detection (95% sensitivity) if cutoffs of 25% fPSA or 0.078 PSAD were used. The commonly used PSAD cutoff of 0.15 detected only 59% of cancers. %fPSA and PSAD also produced similar results for prediction of the post-radical prostatectomy pathologic stage. Patients with cancer with higher %fPSA values (greater than 15%) or lower PSAD values (0.15 or less) tended to have less aggressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that cancer detection (sensitivity) is significantly higher with %fPSA than with age-specific PSA reference ranges. %fPSA and PSAD provide comparable results, suggesting that %fPSA may be used in place of PSAD for biopsy decisions and in algorithms for prediction of less aggressive tumors since the determination of %fPSA does not require ultrasound.
OBJECTIVES: Various methods have been proposed to increase the specificity of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), including age-specific PSA reference ranges, PSA density (PSAD), and percent free PSA (%fPSA). In this multicenter study, we compared these methods for their utility in cancer detection and their ability to predict pathologic stage after radical prostatectomy in patients with clinically localized, Stage T1c cancer. METHODS: Seven hundred seventy-three men (379 with prostate cancer, 394 with benign prostatic disease), 50 to 75 years old, from seven medical centers were enrolled in this prospective blinded study. All subjects had a palpably benign prostate, PSA 4.0 to 10.0 ng/mL, and a histologically confirmed diagnosis. Hybritech's Tandem PSA and free PSA assays were used. RESULTS: %fPSA and age-specific PSA cutoffs enhanced PSA specificity for cancer detection, but %fPSA maintained significantly higher sensitivities. Age-specific PSA cutoffs missed 20% to 60% of cancers in men older than 60 years of age. %fPSA and PSAD performed equally well for detection (95% sensitivity) if cutoffs of 25% fPSA or 0.078 PSAD were used. The commonly used PSAD cutoff of 0.15 detected only 59% of cancers. %fPSA and PSAD also produced similar results for prediction of the post-radical prostatectomy pathologic stage. Patients with cancer with higher %fPSA values (greater than 15%) or lower PSAD values (0.15 or less) tended to have less aggressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that cancer detection (sensitivity) is significantly higher with %fPSA than with age-specific PSA reference ranges. %fPSA and PSAD provide comparable results, suggesting that %fPSA may be used in place of PSAD for biopsy decisions and in algorithms for prediction of less aggressive tumors since the determination of %fPSA does not require ultrasound.
Authors: Ahmed Magheli; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Alan W Partin; Misop Han; Mark L Gonzalgo Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-03-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Vadim Y Dudkin; Justin S Miller; Anna S Dudkina; Christophe Antczak; David A Scheinberg; Samuel J Danishefsky Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-09-18 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Sigrid V Carlsson; Mari T Peltola; Daniel Sjoberg; Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja; Monique J Roobol Journal: BJU Int Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Koenraad van Renterghem; Gommert Van Koeveringe; Ruth Achten; Philip van Kerrebroeck Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2009-06-03 Impact factor: 2.370