Literature DB >> 26864765

Classification of odorants across layers in locust olfactory pathway.

Pavel Sanda1, Tiffany Kee2, Nitin Gupta3, Mark Stopfer4, Maxim Bazhenov5.   

Abstract

Olfactory processing takes place across multiple layers of neurons from the transduction of odorants in the periphery, to odor quality processing, learning, and decision making in higher olfactory structures. In insects, projection neurons (PNs) in the antennal lobe send odor information to the Kenyon cells (KCs) of the mushroom bodies and lateral horn neurons (LHNs). To examine the odor information content in different structures of the insect brain, antennal lobe, mushroom bodies and lateral horn, we designed a model of the olfactory network based on electrophysiological recordings made in vivo in the locust. We found that populations of all types (PNs, LHNs, and KCs) had lower odor classification error rates than individual cells of any given type. This improvement was quantitatively different from that observed using uniform populations of identical neurons compared with spatially structured population of neurons tuned to different odor features. This result, therefore, reflects an emergent network property. Odor classification improved with increasing stimulus duration: for similar odorants, KC and LHN ensembles reached optimal discrimination within the first 300-500 ms of the odor response. Performance improvement with time was much greater for a population of cells than for individual neurons. We conclude that, for PNs, LHNs, and KCs, ensemble responses are always much more informative than single-cell responses, despite the accumulation of noise along with odor information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  locust olfaction; network model; odor concentration; odor discrimination

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26864765      PMCID: PMC4922456          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00921.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  57 in total

Review 1.  Information processing in the olfactory systems of insects and vertebrates.

Authors:  Leslie M Kay; Mark Stopfer
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.727

2.  Intensity versus identity coding in an olfactory system.

Authors:  Mark Stopfer; Vivek Jayaraman; Gilles Laurent
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Odour encoding by temporal sequences of firing in oscillating neural assemblies.

Authors:  M Wehr; G Laurent
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Ultrastructural features of the sensori-motor cortex of the primate.

Authors:  J J Sloper; T P Powell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-03-23       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Temporally diverse firing patterns in olfactory receptor neurons underlie spatiotemporal neural codes for odors.

Authors:  Baranidharan Raman; Joby Joseph; Jeff Tang; Mark Stopfer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Ionic mechanisms underlying synchronized oscillations and propagating waves in a model of ferret thalamic slices.

Authors:  A Destexhe; T Bal; D A McCormick; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and discriminate odors depends upon odor sampling time and concentration.

Authors:  Geraldine A Wright; Michelle Carlton; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice.

Authors:  Nixon M Abraham; Hartwig Spors; Alan Carleton; Troy W Margrie; Thomas Kuner; Andreas T Schaefer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Odor-sampling time of mice under different conditions.

Authors:  Burton Slotnick
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Excitatory local interneurons enhance tuning of sensory information.

Authors:  Collins Assisi; Mark Stopfer; Maxim Bazhenov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  4 in total

1.  Differential effects of adaptation on odor discrimination.

Authors:  Seth Haney; Debajit Saha; Baranidharan Raman; Maxim Bazhenov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Olfactory receptor neurons use gain control and complementary kinetics to encode intermittent odorant stimuli.

Authors:  Srinivas Gorur-Shandilya; Mahmut Demir; Junjiajia Long; Damon A Clark; Thierry Emonet
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  What the odor is not: Estimation by elimination.

Authors:  Vijay Singh; Martin Tchernookov; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.529

4.  Disorder and the Neural Representation of Complex Odors.

Authors:  Kamesh Krishnamurthy; Ann M Hermundstad; Thierry Mora; Aleksandra M Walczak; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.387

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.