Literature DB >> 19170428

A honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and discriminate odors depends upon odor sampling time and concentration.

Geraldine A Wright1, Michelle Carlton, Brian H Smith.   

Abstract

Animals sample sensory stimuli for longer periods when they must perform difficult discrimination tasks, implying that the brain's ability to represent stimuli improves as a function of time. Although it is true in other senses, few studies have examined whether increasing sampling time improves olfactory discrimination. In the experiments reported here, odor sampling time was controlled with the goal of testing whether odor concentration affected a honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and discriminate odors. Increasing sampling time during conditioning and testing improved a honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and differentiate low-concentration (0.0002 M) odors. For intermediate-concentration (0.02 M) odors, both acquisition and recognition improved when stimulus duration was longer, but discrimination was unaffected. Having longer to sample a high-concentration (2.0 M) stimulus also improved acquisition, but it did not affect the ability to recognize or differentiate odors. Differences in time to respond to the conditioned and novel odors during the test period depended on the difficulty of the discrimination task. The results suggest that the sensory coding of molecular identity takes longer for low-concentration odors. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19170428      PMCID: PMC2632763          DOI: 10.1037/a0014040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  44 in total

1.  Peripheral odor coding in the rat and frog: quality and intensity specification.

Authors:  P Duchamp-Viret; A Duchamp; M A Chaput
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Learning modulates the ensemble representations for odors in primary olfactory networks.

Authors:  Kevin C Daly; Thomas A Christensen; Hong Lei; Brian H Smith; John G Hildebrand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Mechanisms of odor discrimination: neurophysiological and behavioral approaches.

Authors:  Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Intensity versus identity coding in an olfactory system.

Authors:  Mark Stopfer; Vivek Jayaraman; Gilles Laurent
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Odour concentration affects odour identity in honeybees.

Authors:  Geraldine A Wright; Mitchell G A Thomson; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Modular representations of odorants in the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb and the effects of stimulus concentration.

Authors:  B A Johnson; M Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-07-10       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice.

Authors:  Nixon M Abraham; Hartwig Spors; Alan Carleton; Troy W Margrie; Thomas Kuner; Andreas T Schaefer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Odor similarity does not influence the time needed for odor processing.

Authors:  Mathias Ditzen; Jan-Felix Evers; C Giovanni Galizia
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Different thresholds for detection and discrimination of odors in the honey bee (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Geraldine A Wright; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Olfactory learning modifies the expression of odour-induced oscillatory responses in the gamma (60-90 Hz) and beta (15-40 Hz) bands in the rat olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Nadine Ravel; Pascal Chabaud; Claire Martin; Valérie Gaveau; Etienne Hugues; Catherine Tallon-Baudry; Olivier Bertrand; Rémi Gervais
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  22 in total

1.  Classification of odorants across layers in locust olfactory pathway.

Authors:  Pavel Sanda; Tiffany Kee; Nitin Gupta; Mark Stopfer; Maxim Bazhenov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Mind the gap: olfactory trace conditioning in honeybees.

Authors:  Paul Szyszka; Christiane Demmler; Mariann Oemisch; Ludwig Sommer; Stephanie Biergans; Benjamin Birnbach; Ana F Silbering; C Giovanni Galizia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A temporal channel for information in sparse sensory coding.

Authors:  Nitin Gupta; Mark Stopfer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Computational models to understand decision making and pattern recognition in the insect brain.

Authors:  Thiago S Mosqueiro; Ramón Huerta
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.186

5.  The involvement of a floral scent in plant-honeybee interaction.

Authors:  Yi Bo Liu; Zhi Jiang Zeng; Andrew B Barron; Ye Ma; Yu Zhu He; Jun Feng Liu; Zhen Li; Wei Yu Yan; Xu Jiang He
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2022-05-29

6.  Rapid decision-making with side-specific perceptual discrimination in ants.

Authors:  Nathalie Stroeymeyt; Fernando J Guerrieri; Jelle S van Zweden; Patrizia d'Ettorre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Associative conditioning tunes transient dynamics of early olfactory processing.

Authors:  Patricia C Fernandez; Fernando F Locatelli; Nicole Person-Rennell; Gregory Deleo; Brian H Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Effect of GABAergic inhibition on odorant concentration coding in mushroom body intrinsic neurons of the honeybee.

Authors:  Anja Froese; Paul Szyszka; Randolf Menzel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Ensemble response in mushroom body output neurons of the honey bee outpaces spatiotemporal odor processing two synapses earlier in the antennal lobe.

Authors:  Martin F Strube-Bloss; Marco A Herrera-Valdez; Brian H Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Keeping their distance? Odor response patterns along the concentration range.

Authors:  Martin Strauch; Mathias Ditzen; C Giovanni Galizia
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.