Literature DB >> 17426048

Odor-sampling time of mice under different conditions.

Burton Slotnick1.   

Abstract

Response accuracy and odor sample times on positive (S+) and negative (S-) trials were recorded for mice trained on a variety of go, no-go odor detection and discrimination tasks. Odor sample time was relatively stable over extended training on the same task, increased during acquisition of difficult tasks, relatively insensitive to reinforcement magnitude, and, in some cases, provided more information regarding task difficulty and discrimination than did response accuracy. Mice generally sampled longer on S- trials in simple odor detection tasks but longer on S+ trials in odor discrimination tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17426048     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjm013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  13 in total

1.  Classification of odorants across layers in locust olfactory pathway.

Authors:  Pavel Sanda; Tiffany Kee; Nitin Gupta; Mark Stopfer; Maxim Bazhenov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Characterizing olfactory binary mixture interactions in Fischer 344 rats using behavioral reaction times.

Authors:  Wendy M Yoder; Leslie Gaynor; Ethan Windham; Michelle Lyman; Olivia Munizza; Barry Setlow; Jennifer L Bizon; David W Smith
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  A specific olfactory cortico-thalamic pathway contributing to sampling performance during odor reversal learning.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Courtiol; Michelle Neiman; Gloria Fleming; Catia M Teixeira; Donald A Wilson
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Characterizing olfactory perceptual similarity using carbon chain discrimination in Fischer 344 rats.

Authors:  Wendy M Yoder; Barry Setlow; Jennifer L Bizon; David W Smith
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Interaction between age and perceptual similarity in olfactory discrimination learning in F344 rats: relationships with spatial learning.

Authors:  Wendy M Yoder; Leslie S Gaynor; Sara N Burke; Barry Setlow; David W Smith; Jennifer L Bizon
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.673

6.  Rat behavior in go/no-go and two-alternative choice odor discrimination: differences and similarities.

Authors:  Donald E Frederick; Daniel Rojas-Líbano; Meagen Scott; Leslie M Kay
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Respiratory and sniffing behaviors throughout adulthood and aging in mice.

Authors:  Daniel W Wesson; Adrienn G Varga-Wesson; Anne H Borkowski; Donald A Wilson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Sniffing behavior of mice during performance in odor-guided tasks.

Authors:  Daniel W Wesson; Tanya N Donahou; Marc O Johnson; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Multimodal signals enhance decision making in foraging bumble-bees.

Authors:  Ipek G Kulahci; Anna Dornhaus; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Rapid encoding and perception of novel odors in the rat.

Authors:  Daniel W Wesson; Ryan M Carey; Justus V Verhagen; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.