Literature DB >> 15572116

Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice.

Nixon M Abraham1, Hartwig Spors, Alan Carleton, Troy W Margrie, Thomas Kuner, Andreas T Schaefer.   

Abstract

Odor discrimination times and their dependence on stimulus similarity were evaluated to test temporal and spatial models of odor representation in mice. In a go/no-go operant conditioning paradigm, discrimination accuracy and time were determined for simple monomolecular odors and binary mixtures of odors. Mice discriminated simple odors with an accuracy exceeding 95%. Binary mixtures evoking highly overlapping spatiotemporal patterns of activity in the olfactory bulb were discriminated equally well. However, while discriminating simple odors in less than 200 ms, mice required 70-100 ms more time to discriminate highly similar binary mixtures. We conclude that odor discrimination in mice is fast and stimulus dependent. Thus, the underlying neuronal mechanisms act on a fast timescale, requiring only a brief epoch of odor-specific spatiotemporal representations to achieve rapid discrimination of dissimilar odors. The fine discrimination of highly similar stimuli, however, requires temporal integration of activity, suggesting a tradeoff between accuracy and speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15572116     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  173 in total

1.  Analyzing Neuronal Networks Using Discrete-Time Dynamics.

Authors:  Sungwoo Ahn; Brian H Smith; Alla Borisyuk; David Terman
Journal:  Physica D       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Olfactory pattern classification by discrete neuronal network states.

Authors:  Jörn Niessing; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Classification of odorants across layers in locust olfactory pathway.

Authors:  Pavel Sanda; Tiffany Kee; Nitin Gupta; Mark Stopfer; Maxim Bazhenov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Characterizing olfactory binary mixture interactions in Fischer 344 rats using behavioral reaction times.

Authors:  Wendy M Yoder; Leslie Gaynor; Ethan Windham; Michelle Lyman; Olivia Munizza; Barry Setlow; Jennifer L Bizon; David W Smith
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  A specific olfactory cortico-thalamic pathway contributing to sampling performance during odor reversal learning.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Courtiol; Michelle Neiman; Gloria Fleming; Catia M Teixeira; Donald A Wilson
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  Temporal dynamics and latency patterns of receptor neuron input to the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Hartwig Spors; Matt Wachowiak; Lawrence B Cohen; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Multiple learning parameters differentially regulate olfactory generalization.

Authors:  Thomas A Cleland; Venkata Anupama Narla; Karim Boudadi
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  A honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and discriminate odors depends upon odor sampling time and concentration.

Authors:  Geraldine A Wright; Michelle Carlton; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Encoding of mixtures in a simple olfactory system.

Authors:  Kai Shen; Sina Tootoonian; Gilles Laurent
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Balancing the Robustness and Efficiency of Odor Representations during Learning.

Authors:  Monica W Chu; Wankun L Li; Takaki Komiyama
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.