| Literature DB >> 26858940 |
Tonje H Haukaas1, Siver A Moestue2, Riyas Vettukattil3, Beathe Sitter4, Santosh Lamichhane5, Remedios Segura6, Guro F Giskeødegård2, Tone F Bathen1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Metabolic profiling of intact tumor tissue by high-resolution magic angle spinning (HR MAS) MR spectroscopy (MRS) provides important biological information possibly useful for clinical diagnosis and development of novel treatment strategies. However, generation of high-quality data requires that sample handling from surgical resection until analysis is performed using systematically validated procedures. In this study, we investigated the effect of postsurgical freezing delay time on global metabolic profiles and stability of individual metabolites in intact tumor tissue.Entities:
Keywords: HR MAS; MR spectroscopy; cancer; degradation; freezing time delay; metabolic profile; metabolomics; snap-freezing
Year: 2016 PMID: 26858940 PMCID: PMC4730796 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1PCA of MR spectra from xenografts tumors exposed to variable freezing delay time, (A) score plot with samples colored by xenograft type, (B) loading plots for PC1 (identifying lipid content as the most significant contributor to variability) and PC2 (identifying the metabolic difference between xenograft models as the second most significant contributor to variability), (C) PCA trajectory score plot. Samples from the same animal are connected with colored lines and numbered according to freezing delay time: (1) not frozen, (2) 0 min, (3) 15 min, (4) 30 min, (5) 60 min, (6) 90 min, and (7) 120 min.
Metabolic effect of freezing delay time.
| Metabolite | ppm | 15 min | 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | 120 min |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | 4.65 | 22 ± 107% | −8 ± 19% | 31 ± 41% | 6 ± 50% | 26 ± 71% |
| Ascorbate | 4.53 | −18 ± 37% | −15 ± 20% | −25 ± 17% | −31 ± 22% | −31 ± 24% |
| Lactate | 4.13 | 4 ± 44% | 10 ± 24% | 12 ± 29% | 16 ± 27% | 19 ± 45% |
| Tyrosine | 3.99 | −8 ± 32% | −10 ± 21% | −13 ± 19% | −15 ± 22% | −17 ± 29% |
| Glycine | 3.55 | −7 ± 45% | −4 ± 22% | −5 ± 25% | 1 ± 45% | 6 ± 62% |
| Myoinositol | 3.53 | 12 ± 49% | 11 ± 19% | 26 ± 28% | 26 ± 27% | 43 ± 64% |
| Taurine | 3.42 | −7 ± 38% | −7 ± 15% | −8 ± 16% | −8 ± 20% | −4 ± 31% |
| Glycerophosphocholine | 3.23 | −9 ± 22% | −10 ± 18% | −3 ± 25% | 0 ± 34% | 28 ± 40% |
| Phosphocholine | 3.22 | −19 ± 24% | −7 ± 16% | 1 ± 32% | 7 ± 25% | 34 ± 63% |
| Choline | 3.21 | 6 ± 72% | 20 ± 31% | 56 ± 44% | 62 ± 49% | 111 ± 111% |
| Creatine | 3.03 | −16 ± 31% | −19 ± 18% | −28 ± 22% | −25 ± 22% | −29 ± 26% |
| Glutathione (GS) | 2.55 | −18 ± 32% | −19 ± 15% | −24 ± 25% | −35 ± 18% | −37 ± 26% |
| Succinate | 2.41 | −5 ± 35% | −13 ± 22% | −2 ± 33% | −13 ± 29% | −15 ± 38% |
| Glutamine | 2.44 | 5 ± 49% | −1 ± 40% | 28 ± 55% | −1 ± 22% | 7 ± 54% |
| Glutamate | 2.37 | −10 ± 35% | −11 ± 17% | −20 ± 17% | −16 ± 25% | −14 ± 37% |
| Alanine | 1.49 | −7 ± 42% | 9 ± 40% | 2 ± 42% | 17 ± 72% | 23 ± 108% |
Percentage (average ± SD) increase or decrease of metabolite level in samples exposed to freezing delay time compared to samples frozen immediately after tumor collection.
LMM-results reporting the effect of xenograft model and freezing delay time on levels of 15 metabolites.
| Metabolite | Xenograft model | Freezing time delay | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adj. | Est. effect | SD | Adj. | Est. effect | SD | |
| Ascorbate | 0.628 | 1.6 | 2.2 | −1.2 | 0.4 | |
| Lactate | 0.849 | −2.5 | 12.2 | 0.281 | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Tyrosine | 0.059 | 128.3 | 33.4 | 0.343 | −7.1 | 5.6 |
| Glycine | 0.649 | −9.4 | 16.9 | 0.838 | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| Myoinositol | 0.373 | −4.8 | 3.9 | 0.072 | 2.7 | 1.1 |
| Taurine | 240.9 | 37.9 | 0.838 | −2.2 | 7.0 | |
| Glycerophosphocholine | −477.3 | 56.6 | 0.255 | 23.9 | 14.6 | |
| Phosphocholine | 470.3 | 94.3 | 0.255 | 22.7 | 13.8 | |
| Choline | 0.068 | 43.5 | 12.5 | 16.2 | 3.7 | |
| Creatine | 0.059 | −41.6 | 10.3 | −8.4 | 3.0 | |
| Glutathione (GS) | 0.649 | −4.1 | 7.3 | −6.0 | 1.6 | |
| Succinate | 0.112 | 8.7 | 3.1 | 0.301 | −1.0 | 0.7 |
| Glutamine | 0.194 | 12.3 | 6.2 | 0.838 | 0.3 | 0.9 |
| Glutamate | 0.322 | −20.9 | 14.4 | 0.348 | −3.7 | 3.1 |
| Alanine | 0.194 | 17.1 | 8.4 | 0.838 | 0.4 | 1.6 |
The estimated effect (Est. effect) reports each fixed factors (i.e., xenograft model or freezing time delay) influence on metabolite levels. Adjusted p-values in bold indicates that the level is significantly different from the sample frozen after 0 min (*adjusted .
Figure 2Impact of freezing delay time on level of (A) ascorbate, (B) choline, (C) creatine, and (D) glutathione. Metabolite integrals from samples subject to 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min freezing delay time compared with samples frozen immediately (0 min). * and ** indicates that the level is significantly different from the sample frozen after 0 min (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).
Figure 3Metabolic effect of snap-freezing. Percentage change in metabolite levels measured in frozen samples relative to samples not frozen prior to HR MAS MRS analysis. * indicates that the level is significantly different from the sample not frozen (*adjusted p < 0.05).
Metabolic effect of prolonged experiment time.
| Metabolite | ppm | 1.5 h | Adj. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | 4.65 | 21 ± 20% | |
| Ascorbate | 4.53 | −4 ± 6% | 0.078 |
| Lactate | 4.15 | 0 ± 7% | 0.903 |
| Tyrosine | 3.98 | 3 ± 6% | 0.08 |
| Glycine | 3.56 | 8 ± 7% | |
| Myoinositol | 3.54 | 7 ± 11% | 0.08 |
| Taurine | 3.42 | 0 ± 5% | 0.903 |
| Glycerophosphocholine | 3.23 | −15 ± 12% | |
| Phosphocholine | 3.22 | −4 ± 6% | 0.08 |
| Choline | 3.21 | 11 ± 13% | |
| Creatine | 3.03 | 0 ± 6% | 0.903 |
Percentages (average ± SD) were calculated relative to the metabolite levels (integrals) from the initial experiment. Adjusted p-values in bold indicates that the level is significantly different from the sample frozen after 0 min (*adjusted .