Literature DB >> 21823183

Predicting long-term survival and treatment response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy by MR metabolic profiling.

Maria D Cao1, Beathe Sitter, Tone F Bathen, Anna Bofin, Per E Lønning, Steinar Lundgren, Ingrid S Gribbestad.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate whether MR metabolic profiling can be used for prediction of long-term survival and monitoring of treatment response in locally advanced breast cancer patients during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
METHODS: High resolution magic angle spinning (HR MAS) MR spectra of pre- and post-treatment biopsies from 33 patients were acquired. Tissue concentrations of choline-containing metabolites (tCho), glycine and taurine were assessed using electronic reference to access in vivo concentration (ERETIC) of the signal and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was used to define their potential to predict patient survival and treatment response. The metabolite profiles obtained by HR MAS spectroscopy were related to long-term survival and treatment response by genetic algorithm partial least squares discriminant analysis (GA PLS-DA).
RESULTS: Different pre-treatment MR metabolic profiles characterized by higher levels of tCho and lower levels of lactate were observed in patients with long-term survival (≥5 years, survivors) compared to patients who died of cancer recurrence (<5 years, non-survivors). A significant decrease in glycerophosphocholine (GPC) post-treatment was associated with long-term survival (p = 0.046) and partial response (p = 0.014) to NAC. Long-term survival was best predicted by GPC using ROC analyses (sens. 66.7%, spec. 62.5%), while taurine had the best predictive value of treatment response (sens. 72.7%, spec. 63.2%). GA PLS-DA multivariate classification models successfully discriminated between survivors and non-survivors, resulting in 82.7% and 90.2% cross-validation (CV) classification accuracy, pre- and post-treatment, respectively. Classification of treatment response using GA PLS-DA was not successful for this patient cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that HR MAS MR metabolic profiles consisting of important metabolic characteristics of breast cancer tumors could potentially assist the classification and prediction of long-term survival in locally advanced breast cancer patients, in addition to being used as an adjunct for evaluation of treatment response to NAC.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21823183     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  42 in total

1.  Targeting choline phospholipid metabolism: GDPD5 and GDPD6 silencing decrease breast cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.

Authors:  Maria Dung Cao; Menglin Cheng; Asif Rizwan; Lu Jiang; Balaji Krishnamachary; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Tone F Bathen; Kristine Glunde
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Bioenergetic analysis of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Authors:  N Jones; J Piasecka; A H Bryant; R H Jones; D O F Skibinski; Nigel J Francis; C A Thornton
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Glycerophosphocholine (GPC) is a poorly understood biomarker in breast cancer.

Authors:  Siver Andreas Moestue; Guro F Giskeødegård; Maria D Cao; Tone F Bathen; Ingrid S Gribbestad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Clinical applications of breast cancer metabolomics using high-resolution magic angle spinning proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (HRMAS 1H MRS): systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Almir G V Bitencourt; Johanna Goldberg; Katja Pinker; Sunitha B Thakur
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 5.  Applications of high-resolution magic angle spinning MRS in biomedical studies II-Human diseases.

Authors:  Christopher Dietz; Felix Ehret; Francesco Palmas; Lindsey A Vandergrift; Yanni Jiang; Vanessa Schmitt; Vera Dufner; Piet Habbel; Johannes Nowak; Leo L Cheng
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 6.  Focus on the glycerophosphocholine pathway in choline phospholipid metabolism of cancer.

Authors:  Kanchan Sonkar; Vinay Ayyappan; Caitlin M Tressler; Oluwatobi Adelaja; Ruoqing Cai; Menglin Cheng; Kristine Glunde
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  2-hydroxyglutarate as a magnetic resonance biomarker for glioma subtyping.

Authors:  Morteza Esmaeili; Riyas Vettukattil; Tone Frost Bathen
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Mitochondrial oxidative stress in cancer-associated fibroblasts drives lactate production, promoting breast cancer tumor growth: understanding the aging and cancer connection.

Authors:  Renee M Balliet; Claudia Capparelli; Carmela Guido; Timothy G Pestell; Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Zhao Lin; Diana Whitaker-Menezes; Barbara Chiavarina; Richard G Pestell; Anthony Howell; Federica Sotgia; Michael P Lisanti
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Metabolic Reprogramming by Folate Restriction Leads to a Less Aggressive Cancer Phenotype.

Authors:  Zahra Ashkavand; Ciara O'Flanagan; Mirko Hennig; Xiuxia Du; Stephen D Hursting; Sergey A Krupenko
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.852

10.  Similarities and Distinctions of Cancer and Immune Metabolism in Inflammation and Tumors.

Authors:  Gabriela Andrejeva; Jeffrey C Rathmell
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 27.287

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.