Literature DB >> 26855501

Multiple Myeloma: Treatment is Getting Individualized.

M B Agarwal1.   

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with varied outcome. The novel agents including two major classes of drugs; the immunomodulatory drugs and the proteasome inhibitors with unprecedented response rates, have replaced conventional chemotherapy. With monoclonal antibodies on the horizon, outcome of this disorder will further improve. Progression in risk stratification systems has made it possible to predict the disease course as well as outcome in myeloma patients with disease categorization into low to high risk. In addition, detection of minimal residual disease by serum free light chain assay, flow cytometry, molecular techniques like polymerase chain reaction and positron emission tomography scan is playing an important role in modifying the treatment. An extensive research in the disease biology has improved our knowledge regarding interplay between myeloma cells and elements of the bone marrow microenvironment which contribute to sustain proliferation and survival as well as de novo drug resistance. Again, insight into the role of genetic and epigenetic interactions in MM has exposed new molecular targets. All these have opened the gateway for novel therapeutic strategies with focus on risk based individualized therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Myeloma; Novel; Personalized; Risk; Stratification; Treatment

Year:  2015        PMID: 26855501      PMCID: PMC4733675          DOI: 10.1007/s12288-015-0575-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus        ISSN: 0971-4502            Impact factor:   0.900


  60 in total

1.  Hypodiploidy is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  N V Smadja; C Bastard; C Brigaudeau; D Leroux; C Fruchart
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Role of B-cell-activating factor in adhesion and growth of human multiple myeloma cells in the bone marrow microenvironment.

Authors:  Yu-Tzu Tai; Xian-Feng Li; Iris Breitkreutz; Weihua Song; Paola Neri; Laurence Catley; Klaus Podar; Teru Hideshima; Dharminder Chauhan; Noopur Raje; Robert Schlossman; Paul Richardson; Nikhil C Munshi; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  International staging system for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Philip R Greipp; Jesus San Miguel; Brian G M Durie; John J Crowley; Bart Barlogie; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; J Anthony Child; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Robert A Kyle; Juan J Lahuerta; Heinz Ludwig; Gareth Morgan; Raymond Powles; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Chaim Shustik; Pieter Sonneveld; Patrizia Tosi; Ingemar Turesson; Jan Westin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Tanespimycin with bortezomib: activity in relapsed/refractory patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Paul G Richardson; Ashraf Z Badros; Sundar Jagannath; Stefano Tarantolo; Jeffrey L Wolf; Maher Albitar; David Berman; Marianne Messina; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 5.  Clinical impact of chromosomal aberrations in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  H Nahi; T Sutlu; M Jansson; E Alici; G Gahrton
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Major tumor shrinking and persistent molecular remissions after consolidation with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with autografted myeloma.

Authors:  Marco Ladetto; Gloria Pagliano; Simone Ferrero; Federica Cavallo; Daniela Drandi; Loredana Santo; Claudia Crippa; Luca De Rosa; Patrizia Pregno; Mariella Grasso; Anna Marina Liberati; Tommaso Caravita; Francesco Pisani; Tommasina Guglielmelli; Vincenzo Callea; Pellegrino Musto; Clotilde Cangialosi; Roberto Passera; Mario Boccadoro; Antonio Palumbo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Twyla B Bartel; Jeff Haessler; Tracy L Y Brown; John D Shaughnessy; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Terri Alpe; Edgardo Angtuaco; Ronald Walker; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Diagnosis and risk stratification in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Niels W C J van de Donk; Pieter Sonneveld
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.722

9.  Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a powerful tool for the detection of aneuploidy in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  M Flactif; M Zandecki; J L Laï; F Bernardi; V Obein; F Bauters; T Facon
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 10.  Molecularly targeted therapies in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Pilar de la Puente; Barbara Muz; Feda Azab; Micah Luderer; Abdel Kareem Azab
Journal:  Leuk Res Treatment       Date:  2014-04-16
View more
  3 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Autologous Stem Cell Treatment as Compared to Conventional Chemotherapy for Treatment of Multiple Myeloma in India.

Authors:  Shankar Prinja; Gunjeet Kaur; Pankaj Malhotra; Gaurav Jyani; Raja Ramachandran; Pankaj Bahuguna; Subhash Varma
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Anaesthesia for fixation of repeated pathological fractures in a patient with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sriraam Kalingarayar; Amar Nandhakumar; Arumugam S Thennavan
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2017-12

3.  Characteristics and outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma : Data from a developing country.

Authors:  Abdul Hameed; Jamshed Ali; Kiran Munawar; Farah Arshad; Farhana Badar; Neelam Siddiqui
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2018-02-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.