Literature DB >> 11568011

Hypodiploidy is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma.

N V Smadja1, C Bastard, C Brigaudeau, D Leroux, C Fruchart.   

Abstract

Conventional karyotypes performed before any treatment in 208 patients with multiple myeloma were reviewed by the Groupe Français de Cytogénétique Hématologique. A total of 138 patients displayed complex chromosomal abnormalities (CCAs). According to the chromosome number pattern, a first group of 75 patients had a hyperdiploid karyotype. A second group of 63 patients referred to as the hypodiploid group had either pseudodiploid, hypodiploid, or near-tetraploid karyotypes. Of 159 treated patients available for survival analysis, 116 had an abnormal karyotype. The comparison of overall survival (OS) between hyperdiploid and hypodiploid patients showed a highly significant difference (median OS 33.8 vs 12.6 months, respectively, P <.001). The presence of 14q32 rearrangements (36 of 116 patients) worsened the prognosis (median OS 17.6 vs 29.9 months, P <.02). The presence of chromosome 13q abnormalities (13qA, 63 patients) did not modify OS in CCA patients (median OS 20.6 vs 27.8 months, P <.59). However, taking into account the whole series including normal karyotypes, 13qA (63 of 159 patients) had a significant impact on OS (median 20.6 vs 37.1 months, P <.04). In the same way, the presence of a hypodiploid karyotype (52 of 159 patients) had a strong prognostic value (OS 12.8 vs 44.5 months, P <.000 01). A multivariate analysis including stage, beta2-microglobulin, bone marrow plasmocytosis, treatment type, 13qA, and hyperdiploidy and hypodiploidy showed that a hypodiploid karyotype was the first independent factor for OS (P <.001), followed by treatment approach. These results confirm that the chromosome number pattern of malignant plasma cells is a very powerful prognostic factor in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11568011     DOI: 10.1182/blood.v98.7.2229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  80 in total

1.  Monosomy 13 in metaphase spreads is a predictor of poor long-term outcome after bortezomib plus dexamethasone treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Miki Kiyota; Tsutomu Kobayashi; Shinichi Fuchida; Mio Yamamoto-Sugitani; Muneo Ohshiro; Yuji Shimura; Shinsuke Mizutani; Hisao Nagoshi; Nana Sasaki; Ryuko Nakayama; Yoshiaki Chinen; Natsumi Sakamoto; Hitoji Uchiyama; Yosuke Matsumoto; Shigeo Horiike; Chihiro Shimazaki; Junya Kuroda; Masafumi Taniwaki
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  The molecular classification of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Fenghuang Zhan; Yongsheng Huang; Simona Colla; James P Stewart; Ichiro Hanamura; Sushil Gupta; Joshua Epstein; Shmuel Yaccoby; Jeffrey Sawyer; Bart Burington; Elias Anaissie; Klaus Hollmig; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Guido Tricot; Frits van Rhee; Ronald Walker; Maurizio Zangari; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie; John D Shaughnessy
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Microarray-based understanding of normal and malignant plasma cells.

Authors:  John De Vos; Dirk Hose; Thierry Rème; Karin Tarte; Jérôme Moreaux; Karéne Mahtouk; Michel Jourdan; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Jean-François Rossi; Friedrich W Cremer; Bernard Klein
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 4.  Genomics in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Nikhil C Munshi; Hervé Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Establishment and exploitation of hyperdiploid and non-hyperdiploid human myeloma cell lines.

Authors:  Xin Li; Angela Pennisi; Fenghuang Zhan; Jeffrey R Sawyer; John D Shaughnessy; Shmuel Yaccoby
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.998

6.  Hyperhaploidy is a novel high-risk cytogenetic subgroup in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J R Sawyer; E Tian; J D Shaughnessy; J Epstein; C M Swanson; C Stangeby; C L Hale; L Parr; M Lynn; G Sammartino; J L Lukacs; C Stein; C Bailey; M Zangari; F E Davies; F Van Rhee; B Barlogie; G J Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 7.  Novel therapies in multiple myeloma for newly diagnosed nontransplant candidates.

Authors:  Sigurdur Yngvi Kristinsson; Ola Landgren; Vincent S Rajkumar
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

8.  Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; Joseph R Mikhael; Francis K Buadi; David Dingli; Angela Dispenzieri; Rafael Fonseca; Morie A Gertz; Philip R Greipp; Suzanne R Hayman; Robert A Kyle; Martha Q Lacy; John A Lust; Craig B Reeder; Vivek Roy; Stephen J Russell; Kristen E Detweiler Short; A Keith Stewart; Thomas E Witzig; Steven R Zeldenrust; Robert J Dalton; S Vincent Rajkumar; P Leif Bergsagel
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Uncovering the biology of multiple myeloma among African Americans: a comprehensive genomics approach.

Authors:  Angela Baker; Esteban Braggio; Susanna Jacobus; Sungwon Jung; Dirk Larson; Terry Therneau; Angela Dispenzieri; Scott A Van Wier; Gregory Ahmann; Joan Levy; Louise Perkins; Seungchan Kim; Kimberly Henderson; David Vesole; S Vincent Rajkumar; Diane F Jelinek; John Carpten; Rafael Fonseca
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Secondary genomic rearrangements involving immunoglobulin or MYC loci show similar prevalences in hyperdiploid and nonhyperdiploid myeloma tumors.

Authors:  Ana Gabrea; Maria Luisa Martelli; Ying Qi; Anna Roschke; Bart Barlogie; John D Shaughnessy; Jeffrey R Sawyer; W Michael Kuehl
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.