Literature DB >> 21158983

Clinical impact of chromosomal aberrations in multiple myeloma.

H Nahi1, T Sutlu, M Jansson, E Alici, G Gahrton.   

Abstract

Chromosomal aberrations are frequently found in multiple myeloma cells and play a major role in patient outcome and management of the disease. The most important chromosomal aberrations associated with poor outcome are del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16) and t(14;20). Others that may be associated with adverse prognosis include amp(1)(q21), del(1p32), del(13), del(8p21) and hypodiploidy. Many chromosomal aberrations have no or uncertain impact; for example, t(11;14), t(8;14) and hyperdiploidy. Attempts have been made to overcome the negative prognostic impact of chromosomal aberrations using autologous or allogeneic transplantation or new immunomodulatory drugs such as thalidomide, lenalidomide and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, but the results are controversial. Data suggest that allogeneic transplantation and treatment with bortezomib or lenalidomide may help to overcome the negative effect of del(13) on prognosis, whereas bortezomib may have some influence on reducing the impact of del(17p), t(4;14) and t(14;16). Chromosome analysis should always be performed at diagnosis of multiple myeloma to improve the prediction of outcome and to aid treatment decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21158983     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02324.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intern Med        ISSN: 0954-6820            Impact factor:   8.989


  7 in total

Review 1.  TRAF6 activation in multiple myeloma: a potential therapeutic target.

Authors:  Hong Liu; Samantha Tamashiro; Stavroula Baritaki; Manuel Penichet; Youhua Yu; Haiming Chen; James Berenson; Benjamin Bonavida
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2012-03-21

2.  In search of the molecular consequences of 8p21 deletion in multiple myeloma: commentary on Gmidéne et al.

Authors:  Tolga Sutlu; Evren Alici; Gösta Gahrton; Hareth Nahi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Multiple Myeloma: Treatment is Getting Individualized.

Authors:  M B Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 0.900

4.  Multiple myeloma-associated hDIS3 mutations cause perturbations in cellular RNA metabolism and suggest hDIS3 PIN domain as a potential drug target.

Authors:  Rafal Tomecki; Karolina Drazkowska; Iwo Kucinski; Krystian Stodus; Roman J Szczesny; Jakub Gruchota; Ewelina P Owczarek; Katarzyna Kalisiak; Andrzej Dziembowski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The t(4;14) translocation and FGFR3 overexpression in multiple myeloma: prognostic implications and current clinical strategies.

Authors:  A Kalff; A Spencer
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 11.037

6.  Genomic profiling of plasma cell disorders in a clinical setting: integration of microarray and FISH, after CD138 selection of bone marrow.

Authors:  Nadine Kaye Berry; Nicole L Bain; Anoop K Enjeti; Philip Rowlings
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Abnormalities in Chromosomes 1q and 13 Independently Correlate With Factors of Poor Prognosis in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Miyoung Kim; Young Su Ju; Eun Jin Lee; Hee Jung Kang; Han Sung Kim; Hyoun Chan Cho; Hyo Jung Kim; Jung Ah Kim; Dong Soon Lee; Young Kyung Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.464

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.