Literature DB >> 15809451

International staging system for multiple myeloma.

Philip R Greipp1, Jesus San Miguel, Brian G M Durie, John J Crowley, Bart Barlogie, Joan Bladé, Mario Boccadoro, J Anthony Child, Herve Avet-Loiseau, Jean-Luc Harousseau, Robert A Kyle, Juan J Lahuerta, Heinz Ludwig, Gareth Morgan, Raymond Powles, Kazuyuki Shimizu, Chaim Shustik, Pieter Sonneveld, Patrizia Tosi, Ingemar Turesson, Jan Westin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a need for a simple, reliable staging system for multiple myeloma that can be applied internationally for patient classification and stratification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data were gathered on 10,750 previously untreated symptomatic myeloma patients from 17 institutions, including sites in North America, Europe, and Asia. Potential prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate techniques. Three modeling approaches were then explored to develop a staging system including two nontree and one tree survival assessment methodologies.
RESULTS: Serum beta2-microglobulin (Sbeta2M), serum albumin, platelet count, serum creatinine, and age emerged as powerful predictors of survival and were then used in the tree analysis approach. A combination of Sbeta2M and serum albumin provided the simplest, most powerful and reproducible three-stage classification. This new International Staging System (ISS) was validated in the remaining patients and consists of the following stages: stage I, Sbeta2M less than 3.5 mg/L plus serum albumin > or = 3.5 g/dL (median survival, 62 months); stage II, neither stage I nor III (median survival, 44 months); and stage III, Sbeta2M > or = 5.5 mg/L (median survival, 29 months). The ISS system was further validated by demonstrating effectiveness in patients in North America, Europe, and Asia; in patients less than and > or = 65 years of age; in patients with standard therapy or autotransplantation; and in comparison with the Durie/Salmon staging system. CONCLUSION) The new ISS is simple, based on easy to use variables (Sbeta2M and serum albumin), and recommended for early adoption and widespread use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15809451     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  726 in total

1.  Multiple myeloma presenting as acute renal failure.

Authors:  Vincent C Kuo; Andrew Z Fenves; Ankit N Mehta
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2011-10

2.  Novel treatment paradigm for elderly patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Antonio Palumbo; Valeria Magarotto
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2011-09-18

3.  Combining fluorescent in situ hybridization data with ISS staging improves risk assessment in myeloma: an International Myeloma Working Group collaborative project.

Authors:  H Avet-Loiseau; B G M Durie; M Cavo; M Attal; N Gutierrez; J Haessler; H Goldschmidt; R Hajek; J H Lee; O Sezer; B Barlogie; J Crowley; R Fonseca; N Testoni; F Ross; S V Rajkumar; P Sonneveld; J Lahuerta; P Moreau; G Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Adaptively weighted association statistics.

Authors:  Michael LeBlanc; Charles Kooperberg
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 5.  Myeloma and Bone Disease.

Authors:  Cristina Panaroni; Andrew J Yee; Noopur S Raje
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Multiple myeloma: an update.

Authors:  Khalil Al-Farsi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2013-01

Review 7.  Novel Treatments for Multiple Myeloma: What Role Do They Have in Older Adults?

Authors:  Hira S Mian; Tanya M Wildes
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Global methylation and promoter-specific methylation of the P16, SOCS-1, E-cadherin, P73 and SHP-1 genes and their expression in patients with multiple myeloma during active disease and remission.

Authors:  Déborah Martínez-Baños; Beatríz Sánchez-Hernández; Guadalupe Jiménez; Georgina Barrera-Lumbreras; Olga Barrales-Benítez
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  The prognostic significance of polyclonal bone marrow plasma cells in patients with relapsing multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Toshi Ghosh; Wilson I Gonsalves; Dragan Jevremovic; Angela Dispenzieri; David Dingli; Michael M Timm; William G Morice; Prashant Kapoor; Taxiarchis V Kourelis; Martha Q Lacy; Suzanne R Hayman; Francis K Buadi; Nelson Leung; Ronald S Go; Yi Lin; Stephen J Russell; John A Lust; Steven R Zeldenrust; Rahma Warsame; Yi L Hwa; Robert A Kyle; Morie A Gertz; S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 10.047

10.  Influence of body mass index on survival in veterans with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Tracey S Beason; Su-Hsin Chang; Kristen M Sanfilippo; Suhong Luo; Graham A Colditz; Ravi Vij; Michael H Tomasson; John F Dipersio; Keith Stockerl-Goldstein; Arun Ganti; Tanya Wildes; Kenneth R Carson
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.