Literature DB >> 26852380

Which factor is most important for occurrence of cutout complications in patients treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation? Retrospective analysis of 298 patients.

Ali Turgut1,2, Önder Kalenderer3, Levent Karapınar3, Mert Kumbaracı3, Hasan Ali Akkan3, Haluk Ağuş3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mechanical complications, such as cut-out of the head-neck fixation device, are the most common causes of morbidity after trochanteric femur fracture treatment. The causes of cut-out complications are well defined in patients who are treated with sliding hip screws and biaxial cephalomedullary nails but there are few reports about the patients who are treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation. AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the most important factor about occurance of cutout complication and also to evaluate the risks of the combination of each possible factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overally 298 patients were enrolled in the study. Medical records were reviewed for patients' age, fracture type, gender, anesthesia type and occurance of cut-out complication. Postoperatively taken radiographs were reviewed for tip-apex distance, obtained collo-diaphyseal angle, the quadrant of the helical blade and Ikuta reduction subgroup. The most important factor (s) and also predicted probability of cut-out complication was calculated for each combination of factors.
RESULTS: Cut-out complication was observed in 14 patients (4.7 %). The most important factor about occurrence of the cut-out complication was found as varus reduction (p: 0.01), the second important factor was found as implantation of the helical blade in the improper quadrant (p: 0.02). Tip-apex distance was found as third important factor (p: 0.10). The predicted probability of cut-out complication was calculated as 45.6 % when whole of the four surgeon dependent factors were improperly obtained.
CONCLUSION: Althought obtaining proper tip-apex distance is important to prevent cutout complication in these fractures, if the fracture is not reduced in varus position and helical blade is inserted in the proper quadrant, possibility of cut-out complication is very low even in the patients with high tip-apex distance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Cut-out; Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation; Trochanteric fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26852380     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-016-2410-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  17 in total

1.  Osteoarthritis is associated with increased failure of proximal femoral fracture fixation.

Authors:  Charles A Gallagher; Christopher W Jones; Lara Kimmel; Christopher Wylde; Anthony Osbrough; Max Bulsara; Kathryn Hird; Piers Yates
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Use of a Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFNA) with cement augmentation for treatment of trochanteric fractures in patients greater than sixty five years of age.

Authors:  Marie Fernandez; Yoann David; Frédéric Dubrana; Rémi Di Francia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Salvage hip replacement after cut-out failure of cephalomedullary nail fixation for proximal femur fractures: a case series describing the technique and results.

Authors:  Sebastián Corró; Rafael Óleo-Taltavull; Jordi Teixidor-Serra; Jordi Tomàs-Hernández; Jordi Selga-Marsà; Yaiza García-Sánchez; Ernesto Guerra-Farfán; José-Vicente Andrés-Peiró
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mitchell Ng; Nihar S Shah; Ivan Golub; Matthew Ciminero; Kevin Zhai; Kevin K Kang; Ahmed K Emara; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-10-19

5.  Timing of proximal femoral shortening in the early postoperative period after cephalomedullary nailing of hip fractures.

Authors:  Zoe B Cheung; Ryan Xiao; David A Forsh
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-23

6.  The Cost and Consequences of Failed Osteosynthesis of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Erdi Özdemir; Mustafa Caner Okkaoglu; Ali Teoman Evren; Yuksel Ugur Yaradilmis; Ahmet Ates; Murat Altay
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Postoperative computed tomography assessment of anteromedial cortex reduction is a predictor for reoperation after intramedullary nail fixation for pertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Norio Yamamoto; Takahiro Imaizumi; Tomoyuki Noda; Tomoo Inoue; Keisuke Kawasaki; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Routine early post-operative X-ray following internal fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures is unjustified: a quality improvement study.

Authors:  David Segal; Ezequiel Palmanovich; Ali Faour; Elad Marom; Viktor Feldman; Eyal Yaacobi; Omer Slevin; Benjamin Kish; Yaron S Brin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Early Experience with the Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFN-A): A Descriptive Review of Thirty-Four Cases from a Single Center.

Authors:  Joshua De Castro Unsay; Ivan Chua Tjun Huat; Ernest Kwek Beng Kee
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  [Effect of screw blade position on proximal femoral nail anti-rotation internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  Jinyuan Zeng; Junjian Ye; Yun Xie; Chunyong Chen; Zhangxiong Lin
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.