Literature DB >> 35922520

Salvage hip replacement after cut-out failure of cephalomedullary nail fixation for proximal femur fractures: a case series describing the technique and results.

Sebastián Corró1, Rafael Óleo-Taltavull2, Jordi Teixidor-Serra2,3, Jordi Tomàs-Hernández2,3, Jordi Selga-Marsà2,3, Yaiza García-Sánchez3, Ernesto Guerra-Farfán2,3, José-Vicente Andrés-Peiró4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cut-out failure following proximal femoral fracture fixation is a compromising complication warranting surgical treatment. We describe 24 patients with cut-out failure after cephalomedullary nail fixation managed with salvage hip replacement.
METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients who had sustained a proximal femoral fracture from December 2009 to December 2019, were managed with cephalomedullary nail fixation and experienced a cut-out failure were reviewed retrospectively. Data on demographics, comorbidities, injury characteristics, treatment, and post-operative course were analysed.
RESULTS: Among 2802 proximal femoral fractures assessed, 28 fixations failed due to cut-out, with 24/28 patients subsequently undergoing salvage hip replacement. Intertrochanteric fractures (66.7%) managed with short nails predominated (79.2%). The median tip-to-apex distance (TAD) was 19 mm, but only two fractures had a good quality of reduction. Inverse correlations were identified between patient age and the time from fixation to cut-out (r =  - 0.57; p = 0.02), and between the time of nailing to failure among patients with a greater TAD (r =  - 0.43; p = 0.04). Most patients were managed via cemented hemiarthroplasty (66.7%). Surgical time was longer for total hip replacements (175.4 vs. 136.8 min; p < 0.01), but no bleeding or blood transfusion requirement differences were found. Two patients had orthopaedic complications, and three patients died within the first follow-up year.
CONCLUSION: In our series, 1% of the proximal femoral fractures managed with a cephalomedullary nail failed due to cut-out. Salvage hip replacement appeared to be a relatively safe and reliable procedure for managing this challenging complication in patients who typically are elderly and physically frail.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cephallomedulary nail fixation; Complications; Cut-out failure; Hip revision; Proximal femur fracture; Salvage hip replacement

Year:  2022        PMID: 35922520     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05529-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.479


  32 in total

Review 1.  Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in older people.

Authors:  William J Gillespie; Lesley D Gillespie; Martyn J Parker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

2.  Predictors of cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation of pertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study of 813 patients.

Authors:  Luigi Murena; Antonio Moretti; Francesca Meo; Enrico Saggioro; Giulia Barbati; Chiara Ratti; Gianluca Canton
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 4.  Management of Acute Hip Fracture.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Marc Swiontkowski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Complications After Hip Nailing for Fractures.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Georgios N Panagopoulos; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Vasilios G Igoumenou; Ioannis Galanopoulos; Christos T Vottis; Panayiotis Karabinas; Panayiotis Koulouvaris; Vasilios A Kontogeorgakos; John Vlamis; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Geller; Comron Saifi; Todd A Morrison; William Macaulay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  What is the optimal salvage procedure for cut-out after surgical fixation of trochanteric fractures with the PFNA or TFN?: A multicentre study.

Authors:  Alexander Brunner; Markus Büttler; Uwe Lehmann; Hans Curd Frei; Renato Kratter; Marco Di Lazzaro; Alexander Scola; An Sermon; Rene Attal
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Hip arthroplasty for failed treatment of proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Carmelo D'Arrigo; Dario Perugia; Alessandro Carcangiu; Edoardo Monaco; Attilio Speranza; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture.

Authors:  Nicola Veronese; Stefania Maggi
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Total hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fracture fixation failure.

Authors:  Liyun Liu; Yongqiang Sun; Linlin Wang; Qiankun Gao; Ang Li; Jialin Wang; Yanzheng Gao
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.