Literature DB >> 26850815

The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Recommendations for Prostate Cancer Screening.

Andrew J Vickers1, James A Eastham2, Peter T Scardino2, Hans Lilja2.   

Abstract

The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) recommendations on prostate cancer screening were developed in response to three limitations of previous screening guidelines: insufficient evidence base, failure to link screening with treatment, and lack of risk stratification. The objective of the recommendations is to provide a schema for prostate cancer screening that maximizes the benefits, in terms of reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality, and minimizes the harms, in terms of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. We recommend the following schema for men choosing to be screened following informed decision-making: starting at age 45, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) without digital rectal examination. If PSA ≥ 3 ng/mL: consider prostate biopsy; if PSA ≥ 1 but < 3 ng/mL: return for PSA testing every 2-4 years; if PSA < 1 ng/mL: return for PSA testing at 6-10 years. PSA testing should end at age 60 for men with PSA ≤ 1 ng/ mL; at 70, unless a man is very healthy and has a higher than average PSA; at 75 for all men. The decision to biopsy a man with a PSA > 3 ng/mL should be based on a variety of factors including repeat blood draw for confirmatory testing of the PSA level, digital rectal examination results, and workup for benign disease. Additional reflex tests in blood such as a free-to-total PSA ratio, the Prostate Health Index, or 4Kscore, or urinary testing of PCA3, can also be informative in some patients. The best evidence suggests that more restricted indication for prostate biopsy and a more focused approach to pursue screening in men at highest risk of lethal cancer would retain most of the mortality benefits of aggressive screening schema, while importantly reducing harms from overdetection and overtreatment.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26850815      PMCID: PMC4842100          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.12.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  23 in total

1.  Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Chen Chi; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Ziding Feng; Howard L Parnes; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project.

Authors: 
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-02

Review 3.  The effect of provider case volume on cancer mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Russell L Gruen; Veronica Pitt; Sally Green; Anne Parkhill; Donald Campbell; Damien Jolley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Jonas Hugosson; Sigrid Carlsson; Gunnar Aus; Svante Bergdahl; Ali Khatami; Pär Lodding; Carl-Gustaf Pihl; Johan Stranne; Erik Holmberg; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  The relationship between prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer risk: the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Monique J Roobol; Jonas Hugosson; J Stephen Jones; Michael W Kattan; Eric Klein; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Jenny Donovan; Dipen J Parekh; Donna Ankerst; George Bartsch; Helmut Klocker; Wolfgang Horninger; Amine Benchikh; Gilles Salama; Arnauld Villers; Steve J Freedland; Daniel M Moreira; Fritz H Schröder; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Prostate-specific antigen levels as a predictor of lethal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Katja Fall; Hans Garmo; Ove Andrén; Anna Bill-Axelson; Jan Adolfsson; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson; Lars Holmberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Balancing the harms and benefits of early detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pim J van Leeuwen; David Connolly; Teuvo L J Tammela; Anssi Auvinen; Ries Kranse; Monique J Roobol; Fritz H Schroder; Anna Gavin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Long-term prediction of prostate cancer up to 25 years before diagnosis of prostate cancer using prostate kallikreins measured at age 44 to 50 years.

Authors:  Hans Lilja; David Ulmert; Thomas Björk; Charlotte Becker; Angel M Serio; Jan-Ake Nilsson; Per-Anders Abrahamsson; Andrew J Vickers; Göran Berglund
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Variation of serum prostate-specific antigen levels: an evaluation of year-to-year fluctuations.

Authors:  James A Eastham; Elyn Riedel; Peter T Scardino; Moshe Shike; Martin Fleisher; Arthur Schatzkin; Elaine Lanza; Lianne Latkany; Colin B Begg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Clinicians are poor raters of life-expectancy before radical prostatectomy or definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jochen Walz; Andrea Gallina; Paul Perrotte; Claudio Jeldres; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Georg C Hutterer; Miriam Traumann; Alvaro Ramirez; Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael McCormack; Jean-Paul Perreault; Francois Bénard; Luc Valiquette; Fred Saad; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  22 in total

1.  Screening for Prostate Cancer Starting at Age 50-54 Years. A Population-based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Melissa Assel; David Ulmert; Axel Gerdtsson; Jonas Hugosson; Andrew Vickers; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: Time to Change the Dominant Forces on the Pendulum.

Authors:  Jonathan E Shoag; Peter N Schlegel; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  What's new in screening in 2015?

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.309

4.  Twenty-year Risk of Prostate Cancer Death by Midlife Prostate-specific Antigen and a Panel of Four Kallikrein Markers in a Large Population-based Cohort of Healthy Men.

Authors:  Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Melissa Assel; Anders Dahlin; Bing Ying Poon; David Ulmert; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.

Authors:  Anita D Misra-Hebert; Bo Hu; Eric A Klein; Andrew Stephenson; Glen B Taksler; Michael W Kattan; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Risk of Prostate Cancer-related Death Following a Low PSA Level in the PLCO Trial.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Amanda Black; Rebecca Landy; Lauren C Houghton; Christine D Berg; Robert L Grubb
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-01-29

Review 7.  The Contemporary Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ariel A Schulman; Christina Sze; Efrat Tsivian; Rajan T Gupta; Judd W Moul; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Multicenter analysis of clinical and MRI characteristics associated with detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS (v2.0) category 3 lesions.

Authors:  Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh; Leonard S Marks; Geoffrey A Sonn; Shyam Natarajan; Richard E Fan; Michael D Gross; Elizabeth Mauer; Samprit Banerjee; Stefanie Hectors; Sigrid Carlsson; Daniel J Margolis; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Perspective on Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Challenges in Adopting Level 1 Evidence for Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Biomarker for Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Soo Jeong Kim; Andrew J Vickers; Jim C Hu
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.