Literature DB >> 20598634

Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial.

Jonas Hugosson1, Sigrid Carlsson, Gunnar Aus, Svante Bergdahl, Ali Khatami, Pär Lodding, Carl-Gustaf Pihl, Johan Stranne, Erik Holmberg, Hans Lilja.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is one of the leading causes of death from malignant disease among men in the developed world. One strategy to decrease the risk of death from this disease is screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA); however, the extent of benefit and harm with such screening is under continuous debate.
METHODS: In December, 1994, 20,000 men born between 1930 and 1944, randomly sampled from the population register, were randomised by computer in a 1:1 ratio to either a screening group invited for PSA testing every 2 years (n=10,000) or to a control group not invited (n=10,000). Men in the screening group were invited up to the upper age limit (median 69, range 67-71 years) and only men with raised PSA concentrations were offered additional tests such as digital rectal examination and prostate biopsies. The primary endpoint was prostate-cancer specific mortality, analysed according to the intention-to-screen principle. The study is ongoing, with men who have not reached the upper age limit invited for PSA testing. This is the first planned report on cumulative prostate-cancer incidence and mortality calculated up to Dec 31, 2008. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial ISRCTN54449243.
FINDINGS: In each group, 48 men were excluded from the analysis because of death or emigration before the randomisation date, or prevalent prostate cancer. In men randomised to screening, 7578 (76%) of 9952 attended at least once. During a median follow-up of 14 years, 1138 men in the screening group and 718 in the control group were diagnosed with prostate cancer, resulting in a cumulative prostate-cancer incidence of 12.7% in the screening group and 8.2% in the control group (hazard ratio 1.64; 95% CI 1.50-1.80; p<0.0001). The absolute cumulative risk reduction of death from prostate cancer at 14 years was 0.40% (95% CI 0.17-0.64), from 0.90% in the control group to 0.50% in the screening group. The rate ratio for death from prostate cancer was 0.56 (95% CI 0.39-0.82; p=0.002) in the screening compared with the control group. The rate ratio of death from prostate cancer for attendees compared with the control group was 0.44 (95% CI 0.28-0.68; p=0.0002). Overall, 293 (95% CI 177-799) men needed to be invited for screening and 12 to be diagnosed to prevent one prostate cancer death.
INTERPRETATION: This study shows that prostate cancer mortality was reduced almost by half over 14 years. However, the risk of over-diagnosis is substantial and the number needed to treat is at least as high as in breast-cancer screening programmes. The benefit of prostate-cancer screening compares favourably to other cancer screening programs. FUNDING: The Swedish Cancer Society, the Swedish Research Council, and the National Cancer Institute. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20598634      PMCID: PMC4089887          DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70146-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  34 in total

1.  Measuring the psychosocial impact of population-based prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer in the UK.

Authors:  Lucy A Brindle; Steven E Oliver; Daniel Dedman; Jenny L Donovan; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy; Janet A Lane; Tim J Peters
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Screening for prostate cancer: a Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  Dragan Ilic; Denise O'Connor; Sally Green; Timothy Wilt
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  15-year followup of a population based prostate cancer screening study.

Authors:  Anders Kjellman; Olof Akre; Ulf Norming; Magnus Törnblom; Ove Gustafsson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Survival benefit in a randomized clinical trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  E Lindholm; H Brevinge; E Haglind
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an update.

Authors:  Paul Hewitson; Paul Glasziou; Eila Watson; Bernie Towler; Les Irwig
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  PSA doubling time predicts the outcome after active surveillance in screening-detected prostate cancer: results from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, Sweden section.

Authors:  Ali Khatami; Khatami Ali; Gunnar Aus; Aus Gunnar; Jan-Erik Damber; Damber Jan-Erik; Hans Lilja; Lilja Hans; Pär Lodding; Lodding Pär; Jonas Hugosson; Hugosson Jonas
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prostate cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian cancer screening trial: update on findings from the initial four rounds of screening in a randomized trial.

Authors:  Robert L Grubb; Paul F Pinsky; Robert T Greenlee; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Thomas P Hickey; Thomas L Riley; Jerome E Mabie; David L Levin; David Chia; Barnett S Kramer; Douglas J Reding; Timothy R Church; Lance A Yokochi; Paul A Kvale; Joel L Weissfeld; Donald A Urban; Saundra S Buys; Edward P Gelmann; Lawrence R Ragard; E David Crawford; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg; Gerald L Andriole
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Anxiety associated with prostate cancer screening with special reference to men with a positive screening test (elevated PSA) - Results from a prospective, population-based, randomised study.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Gunnar Aus; Catrin Wessman; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Tyrol Prostate Cancer Demonstration Project: early detection, treatment, outcome, incidence and mortality.

Authors:  Georg Bartsch; Wolfgang Horninger; Helmut Klocker; Alexandre Pelzer; Jasmin Bektic; Wilhelm Oberaigner; Harald Schennach; Georg Schäfer; Ferdinand Frauscher; Mathieu Boniol; Gianluca Severi; Chris Robertson; Peter Boyle
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  283 in total

Review 1.  Management of low (favourable)-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Best of the AUA Annual Meeting: Highlights From the 2011 American Urological Association Meeting, May 14-19, 2011, Washington, DC.

Authors:  Michael K Brawer; Stacy Loeb; Alan W Partin; Jayabalan Nirmal; Michael B Chancellor; J Curtis Nickel; Jacob Rajfer; Ellen Shapiro; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

3.  Guidelines are too important to be left to clinical experts.

Authors:  Mattias Johansson; Pär Stattin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Furthering the prostate cancer screening debate (prostate cancer specific mortality and associated risks).

Authors:  G Michael Allan; Michael P Chetner; Bryan J Donnelly; Neil A Hagen; David Ross; J Dean Ruether; Peter Venner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Urological cancer: Time for another rethink on prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  [What can medicine expect from health economics?].

Authors:  E Bismarck; B J Schmitz-Dräger; O Schöffski
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  [U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation or "throwing out the baby with the bath water"].

Authors:  F Recker
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  The absence of voiding symptoms in men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration of ≥3.0 ng/mL is an independent risk factor for prostate cancer: results from the Gothenburg Randomized Screening Trial.

Authors:  Maria Frånlund; Sigrid Carlsson; Johan Stranne; Gunnar Aus; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Clinical Consultation Guide: How to Optimize the Use of Prostate-specific Antigen in the Current Era.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Hans Lilja; Andrew Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2015-06-09

10.  Efficacy versus effectiveness study design within the European screening trial for prostate cancer: consequences for cancer incidence, overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality.

Authors:  Xiaoye Zhu; Pim J van Leeuwen; Erik Holmberg; Meelan Bul; Sigrid Carlsson; Fritz H Schröder; Monique J Roobol; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.