| Literature DB >> 26848749 |
Dong Ho Suh1, Eun Sung Jung1, Hye Min Park1, Seung Hyung Kim2, Sarah Lee3, Yang Hee Jo4, Mi Kyeong Lee4, Gayoung Jung5, Seon-Gil Do5, Choong Hwan Lee1.
Abstract
We used ultra-performance-liquid-chromatography with quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry to study the changes in metabolites in the mixture of Cudrania tricuspidata, Lonicera caerulea, and soybean (CLM) during fermentation. Additionally, the antiobesity effects of CLM and fermented-CLM (FCLM) were studied based on the analysis of plasma from high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice. The levels of cyanidin and the glycosides of luteolin, quercetin, and cyanidin derived from L. caerulea were decreased, whereas the levels of luteolin and quercetin were increased during fermentation. Isoflavone glycosides and soyasaponins originating from the soybean were decreased, whereas their aglycones such as daidzein, glycitein, and genistein were increased. As for prenylated flavonoids from C. tricuspidata, these metabolites were decreased at the early stage of fermentation, and were increased at end of the fermentation. In terms of the functional food product, various metabolites derived from diverse natural products in CLM had complementary effects and demonstrated higher antioxidant and pancreatic lipase inhibition activities after fermentation; these activities were closely related to flavonoid aglycones including genistein, daidzein, glycitein, luteolin, and quercetin. In an in vivo experiment, several clinical parameters affected by HFD were improved by the administration of either CLM or FCLM, but there was a difference in the antiobesity effects. The levels of lysoPCs with C20:4, C16:0, and C22:6 were significantly attenuated by CLM administration, while the attenuated levels of lysoPCs with C20:4 and C18:2 were significantly restored by FCLM administration. These metabolites may explain the above-mentioned differences in antiobesity effects. Although only the changes in plasma lysophospholipids could not fully explain antiobesity effects between non-fermented and fermented plant mixtures from our results, we suggest that metabolomics approach could provide a way to reveal the metabolite alterations in the complex fermentation process and understand the differences or changes in bioactivity according to fermentation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26848749 PMCID: PMC4743955 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Schematic representation of the experimental procedures.
The plasma metabolites significantly altered by CLM, FCLM, and xenical administration in the mouse model of HFD-induced obesity according to UPLC-Q-TOF-MS analysis.
| No. | RT | Tentative metabolites | Measured Mass ( | MW | HMDB formula | Error (mDa) | PPM | Fold change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | negative | HD/ND | HCLM/HD | HFCLM/HD | HX/HD | |||||||
| 1 | 7.26 | - | 288.2914 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.77 | 1.06 | 0.93 | 0.89 |
| 2 | 7.69 | - | 437.1937 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.81 | 0.94 | 1.31 | 0.89 |
| 3 | 8.01 | LysoPC(14:0) | 468.3107 | 452.2792 | 467 | C22H46NO7P | 2.8 | 6 | 0.93 | 0.8 | 0.87 | 1.22 |
| 4 | 8.04 | LysoPC(18:3) | 518.3263 | 502.2992 | 517 | C22H46NO7P | 2.3 | 4.4 | 0.52 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 1.37 |
| 5 | 8.17 | LysoPC(18:3) | 518.3259 | 502.2906 | 517 | C22H46NO7P | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.66 | 0.99 | 1.11 | 1.33 |
| 6 | 8.39 | LysoPE(22:6) | 526.2955 | 524.2861 | 525 | C27H44NO7P | -0.1 | -0.2 | 1.43 | 0.88 | 1.07 | 0.88 |
| 7 | 8.41 | LysoPC(22:6) | 568.3396 | 552.305 | 567 | C30H50NO7P | -3.1 | -5.5 | 1.51 | 0.81 | 0.98 | 0.74 |
| 8 | 8.45 | LysoPC(18:2) | 520.3391 | 504.306 | 519 | C26H50NO7P | 3.5 | 6.7 | 0.83 | 1.03 | 1.14 | 1.20 |
| 9 | 8.47 | LysoPC(20:4) | 544.3388 | 528.3116 | 543 | C28H50NO7P | -3.8 | -7 | 1.35 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.93 |
| 10 | 8.53 | LysoPE(22:6) | 526.299 | 524.2785 | 525 | C27H44NO7P | -1 | -1.8 | 1.31 | 0.88 | 1.02 | 0.91 |
| 11 | 8.57 | LysoPC(22:6) | 568.3409 | 552.3084 | 567 | C30H50NO7P | 1.1 | 1.9 | 1.42 | 0.84 | 0.96 | 0.81 |
| 12 | 8.57 | LysoPE(18:0) | 482.3263 | 466.3015 | 481 | C23H48NO7P | 1.5 | 3.1 | 0.57 | 0.89 | 0.95 | 1.22 |
| 13 | 8.62 | LysoPC(20:4) | 544.3397 | 528.3093 | 543 | C28H50NO7P | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.37 | 0.86 | 0.85 | 0.92 |
| 14 | 8.65 | LysoPC(18:2) | 520.34 | 504.3059 | 519 | C26H50NO7P | 1.6 | 3.1 | 0.77 | 1.01 | 1.08 | 1.23 |
| 15 | 8.84 | LysoPC(22:5) | 570.3575 | 614.3306 | 569 | C30H52NO7P | 2.7 | 4.7 | 1.16 | 0.70 | 0.86 | 0.71 |
| 16 | 8.86 | LysoPC(20:3) | 546.3574 | 530.3217 | 545 | C28H52NO7P | 4.2 | 7.7 | 0.94 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.76 |
| 17 | 9.03 | LysoPC(20:3) | 546.356 | 530.3247 | 545 | C28H52NO7P | -2.4 | -4.4 | 0.92 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.81 |
| 18 | 9.38 | LysoPC(18:1) | 522.3546 | 506.3217 | 521 | C26H52NO7P | -0.8 | -1.5 | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 1.06 |
| 19 | 9.62 | LysoPC(20:2) | 548.3734 | 532.338 | 547 | C28H54NO7P | -0.1 | -0.2 | 0.8 | 0.71 | 0.81 | 1.59 |
| 20 | 10.03 | LysoPC(18:0) | 524.3711 | 508.3421 | 523 | C26H54NO7P | 2.6 | 4.6 | 1.33 | 1.01 | 1.14 | 0.90 |
| 21 | 10.25 | LysoPC(18:0) | 524.3712 | 508.3445 | 523 | C26H54NO7P | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.18 | 1.03 | 1.1 | 0.93 |
Metabolites selected by variable important in the projection (VIP) > 0.7 and p value < 0.05 from PLS-DA model.
aRetention time.
bMolecular weight.
cHMDB: The Human Metabolome Data Base (http://hmdb.ca/).
dRelative levels of metabolites were converted into fold changes.
*This means the 2 forms of lysoPC with the fatty acyl groups at sn-1 or sn-2 on the glycerol backbone.
#a significant difference between the HD group and a treatment group (HCLM, HFCLM, or HX, p value < 0.05).
LysoPC: lysophosphatidylcholine; LysoPE: lysophosphatidylethanolamine.
ND (normal-diet group), HD (high-fat diet group), HCLM (HFD with CLM administrated group), HFCLM (HFD with FCLM administrated group), HX (HFD with xenical administrated group).
Fig 2Principal component analysis (PCA; A: positive mode, B: negative mode) score plots and heatmap (C) derived from UPLC-Q-TOF-MS data on CLM during fermentation; ●CLM0h (unfermented CLM), ●FCLM8h (CLM fermented for 8 h), ●FCLM16h (CLM fermented for 16 h), ●FCLM24h (CLM fermented for 24 h), ●FCLM32h (CLM fermented for 32 h), ●FCLM40h (CLM fermented for 40 h), ■FCLM60h (CLM fermented for 60 h).
Each data point shown on the heatmap was normalized by the mean values of each set.
Fig 3OPLS-DA score plot (A), S-plot (B), and heatmap (C) derived from comparison of UPLC-Q-TOF-MS data sets between CLM and FCLM. Each data point shown on the heatmap was normalized by the mean values of each set.
Fig 4The results of analysis of antioxidant (A) and pancreatic lipase activities (B), TPC (C), and TFC (D) of CLM during fermentation; CLM0h (unfermented CLM), FCLM8h (CLM fermented for 8 h), FCLM16h (CLM fermented for 16 h), FCLM24h (CLM fermented for 24 h), FCLM32h (CLM fermented for 32 h), FCLM40h (CLM fermented for 40 h), FCLM60h (CLM fermented for 60 h). Different letters are significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple-range test (p < 0.05).
Fig 5The body weight change (A), triglyceride (TG) level in feces (B), and alterations in the histopathology of the liver tissues stained with hematoxylin and eosin (C) of high-fat diet (HFD) groups (mouse model of HFD-induced obesity) receiving CLM, FCLM, or xenical; ND (normal-diet group), HD (high-fat diet group), HX (HFD with xenical administrated group), HCLM (HFD with CLM administrated group), HFCLM (HFD with FCLM administrated group). The statistical analysis was performed by an independent t test in comparison with the HD group (**p value < 0.01, ***p value < 0.001).
The effect of CLM, FCLM, and xenical administration on histological and blood biochemical parameters in the mouse model of HFD-induced obesity.
| Experimental groups | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | ND | HD | HCLM | HFCLM | HX |
| Subcutaneous fat (g) | 0.33±0.02 | 1.59±0.04# | 1.00±0.09*** | 1.03±0.13*** | 0.90±0.09*** |
| Adipocyte area (μm) | 49.40±1.65 | 128.20±1.83# | 77.10±0.77*** | 70.30±1.08*** | 76.50±1.22*** |
| Epididymal adipose tissue (g) | 0.66±0.05 | 2.72±0.06# | 1.81±0.11*** | 1.85±0.23** | 1.68±0.10*** |
| Adipose tissue (g) | 0.23±0.03 | 1.11±0.03# | 0.83±0.06*** | 0.84±0.10* | 0.75±0.05*** |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 157.30±13.34 | 214.30±9.89# | 192.00±5.69* | 200.60±10.31 | 201.40±5.63 |
| Triacylglycerol (mg/dL) | 97.60±7.05 | 193.90±19.50# | 89.90±6.63*** | 91.60±5.85*** | 107.80±3.07*** |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 30.60±2.89 | 36.40±5.97 | 31.10±2.09 | 31.80±1.87 | 28.90±3.25 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 84.90±3.23 | 104.90±3.16# | 104.30±3.63 | 109.00±4.09 | 86.00±1.71*** |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 131.10±13.60 | 204.70±12.25# | 196.10±13.01 | 202.90±10.70 | 188.70±13.28 |
| ALT (U/L) | 29.80±1.85 | 41.60±1.54# | 25.60±1.35*** | 29.50±1.79*** | 33.70±2.06** |
| Insulin (ng/ml) | 2935.60±339.10 | 3466.20±427.50# | 2370.60±227.00* | 3001.20±217.40 | 2472.55±193.50* |
| Leptin (ng/ml) | 0.23±0.05 | 1.10±0.27# | 0.37±0.08* | 0.85±0.15 | 0.47±0.22* |
The statistical analysis was performed by an independent t test in comparison with the HD group (#p value < 0.05, *p value < 0.05, **p value < 0.01, ***p value < 0.001).
ND (normal-diet group), HD (high-fat diet group), HCLM (HFD with CLM administrated group), HFCLM (HFD with FCLM administrated group), HX (HFD with xenical administrated group).
Fig 6PLS-DA score plots (A) and box-whisker plots (B) of statistically significant metabolites showing a tendency for restoration as a result of administration of CLM, FCLM, or xenical in the mouse model of high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity; ND (normal-diet group), HD (high-fat diet group), HX (HFD with xenical administrated group), HCLM (HFD with CLM administrated group), HFCLM (HFD with FCLM administrated group). The statistical analysis was performed by an independent t test in comparison with the HD group (#p value < 0.05, *p value < 0.05).