Literature DB >> 33619589

Change in vertebral strength and bone mineral density in men and women over the year post-hip fracture: a subgroup analysis.

Denise L Orwig1, David Kopperdahl2, Tony Keaveny3, Jay Magaziner4, Marc Hochberg4,5.   

Abstract

This study examines changes in bone density and strength in the spine over the year after hip fracture to see if there are differences in the changes between men and women. Results show losses in the spine that may increase the risk of subsequent vertebral fractures, particularly for women.
PURPOSE: Compare changes over the first year post-hip fracture in vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) and compressive strength, measured from quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans of the spine (T12-L1), between women and men.
METHODS: QCT scans were performed on 37 participants (21 men and 16 women) at 2 and 12 months post-hip fracture as part of an ancillary observational study of hip fracture recovery in older community-dwelling men and women. Vertebral BMD and compressive strength were calculated using VirtuOst® (O.N. Diagnostics, Berkeley, CA). Unpaired t-tests were used to compare men and women with respect to baseline demographics, measurements of BMD and bone strength for the whole vertebra and the cortical and trabecular compartments, and any changes in these parameters between months 2 and 12.
RESULTS: At 2 months post-fracture, there were no significant sex differences in any measurements of vertebral strength or BMD. Between months 2 and 12, vertebral strength decreased significantly in women (- 3.8%, p < 0.05) but not in men (- 2.3%, p < 0.20), vertebral trabecular BMD decreased similarly in both sexes (- 5.7% women; - 6.0% men), but cortical BMD did not change for either sex.
CONCLUSION: Despite the small sample size, these findings suggest that appreciable loss of vertebral trabecular bone can occur for both sexes in the year following hip fracture, which may increase the risk of subsequent vertebral fracture, particularly for women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; Finite element analysis; Gender; Hip fracture; Vertebral strength

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33619589      PMCID: PMC8183184          DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00907-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  27 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical computed tomography-noninvasive bone strength analysis using clinical computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Bone mineral density, soft tissue body composition, strength, and functioning after hip fracture.

Authors:  Lois E Wehren; William G Hawkes; J Richard Hebel; Denise L Orwig; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Loss of bone density and lean body mass after hip fracture.

Authors:  K M Fox; J Magaziner; W G Hawkes; J Yu-Yahiro; J R Hebel; S I Zimmerman; L Holder; R Michael
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Older men who sustain a hip fracture experience greater declines in bone mineral density at the contralateral hip than non-fractured comparators.

Authors:  A M Rathbun; J Magaziner; M D Shardell; L M Yerges-Armstrong; D Orwig; G E Hicks; M C Hochberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Women with hip fracture have a greater rate of decline in bone mineral density than expected: another significant consequence of a common geriatric problem.

Authors:  J Magaziner; L Wehren; W G Hawkes; D Orwig; J R Hebel; L Fredman; K Stone; S Zimmerman; M C Hochberg
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Difference in the trajectory of change in bone geometry as measured by hip structural analysis in the narrow neck, intertrochanteric region, and femoral shaft between men and women following hip fracture.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Michelle Shardell; Denise Orwig; J Richard Hebel; Gregory E Hicks; Thomas J Beck; Jay Magaziner; Marc C Hochberg
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Predictors of bone loss after hip fracture.

Authors:  Lois E Wehren; William G Hawkes; J Richard Hebel; Denise Orwig; Sheryl I Zimmerman; Kathleen M Fox; Janet Yu-Yahiro; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Women with hip fracture experience greater loss of geometric strength in the contralateral hip during the year following fracture than age-matched controls.

Authors:  L Reider; T J Beck; M C Hochberg; W G Hawkes; D Orwig; J A YuYahiro; J R Hebel; J Magaziner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  The impact of decreasing U.S. hip fracture rates on future hip fracture estimates.

Authors:  J A Stevens; R A Rudd
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Differences in the trajectory of bone mineral density change measured at the total hip and femoral neck between men and women following hip fracture.

Authors:  Alan M Rathbun; Michelle Shardell; Denise Orwig; J Richard Hebel; Gregory E Hicks; Thomas Beck; Marc C Hochberg; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.