Literature DB >> 9579122

Extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer: when, for whom and why.

D H Roukos1.   

Abstract

Although lymph node metastasis is a major prognostic factor in gastric cancer, the optimal extent of lymph node dissection still remains a subject of debate. The influence of extended D2 lymphadenectomy on morbidity and long-term survival is controversial. Reports from many Japanese and some Western institutions show similar morbidity and mortality rates for both limited D1 and extended D2 resections. However, the four available randomised trials show a significant increase in operative morbidity and mortality after a D2 resection. The authors of these trials believe that distal pancreaticosplenectomy is responsible for this increased morbidity and mortality and not the lymphadenectomy itself. Retrospective and prospective non-randomised studies show superior stage (II/IIIA) specific survival rates after D2 resections. However, these studies did not eliminate stage migration and randomised trials failed to show any survival advantage in favour of the D2 resection. Current data suggest that D2 resection is beneficial to the subgroup of patients with N1 or N2 disease undergoing potentially curative resection. However, Western studies that support D2 resection, fail to show any survival advantage for D2 resection in N2 patients, reporting a benefit only to N0 or N1 patients. In contrast, Japanese series report a large number of N2 long-term survivors. The question as to the possible beneficial effect of extended lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer is difficult and complex. D2 resection increases the potentially curative resection rate, at least in N2 patients, achieves a better locoregional tumour control and provides the only chance for cure among N2 patients since adjuvant treatment in gastric carcinoma has not yet been proved effective. However, all randomised comparisons warn of an increased risk after D2 resection. By avoiding pancreaticosplenectomy, however, the morbidity can be within acceptable limits. D2 gastrectomy seems to be the most attractive procedure in the surgical management of gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9579122      PMCID: PMC2502772     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  57 in total

1.  Adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a review of 35 years and 1,710 cases.

Authors:  J R Breaux; W Bringaze; C Chappuis; I Cohn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  [Prognostic factors in stomach cancer. Results of a uni- and multivariate analysis].

Authors:  K Böttcher; K Becker; R Busch; J D Roder; J R Siewert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  A detailed histological study on occult metastasis of the lymph nodes.

Authors:  S Natsugoe; T Aiko; H Shimazu
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1991-09

4.  Morbidity of radical lymphadenectomy in the curative resection of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  J W Smith; M H Shiu; L Kelsey; M F Brennan
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1991-12

Review 5.  Improving survival in gastric cancer: review of 5-year survival rates in English language publications from 1970.

Authors:  J A Akoh; I M Macintyre
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Gastric cancer: an audit of 122 consecutive cases and the results of R1 gastrectomy.

Authors:  T T Irvin; J E Bridger
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Prognostic value of the number of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric cancer with radical surgery.

Authors:  H Isozaki; K Okajima; Y Kawashima; S Yamada; E Nakata; J Nishimura; T Ichinona
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Gastric cancer: a curable disease in Britain.

Authors:  H M Sue-Ling; D Johnston; I G Martin; M F Dixon; M R Lansdown; M J McMahon; A T Axon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-04

9.  Lymphadenectomy in gastric carcinoma. A prospective and prognostic study.

Authors:  J Jaehne; H J Meyer; H Maschek; H Geerlings; E Burns; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-03

10.  Prognostic factors in gastric carcinoma. Results of the German Gastric Carcinoma Study 1992.

Authors:  J D Roder; K Böttcher; J R Siewert; R Busch; P Hermanek; H J Meyer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  27 in total

1.  Laparoscopic gastrectomy and impact on recurrence of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Christof Hottenrott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  To the editor: the role of prophylactic surgery in cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Fatouros; Georgios Baltogiannis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: may it improve also survival?

Authors:  Dimosthenis Ziogas; Dimitrios Roukos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  EGFR as a Prognostic Marker for Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Theodore Liakakos; Nikolaos Xeropotamos; Dimosthenis Ziogas; Dimitrios Roukos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laparoscopic gastrectomy for organ-confined cancer: a reality in the West?

Authors:  Ernst Hanisch; Dimosthenis Ziogas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Impact of laparoscopic D2 gastrectomy on long-term survival for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kanellos; Ioannis Kanellos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Expectations and challenges of laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Theodore Liakakos; Pavlos Patapis; Evangelos Misiakos; Anastasios Macheras
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Facts and trends in laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer.

Authors:  D Kanellos; M G Pramateftakis; Ioannis Kanellos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Body mass index and risks of laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Authors:  Christof Hottenrott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Open versus laparoscopic versus robotic gastrectomy for cancer: need for comparative-effectiveness quality.

Authors:  G Glantzounis; D Ziogas; G Baltogiannis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.