RATIONALE: The metabolite profiling of a NIST plasma Standard Reference Material (SRM 1950) on different liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) platforms showed significant differences. Although these findings suggest caution when interpreting metabolomics results, the degree of overlap of both profiles allowed us to use tandem mass spectral libraries of recurrent spectra to evaluate to what extent these results are transferable across platforms and to develop cross-platform chemical signatures. METHODS: Non-targeted global metabolite profiles of SRM 1950 were obtained on different LC/MS platforms using reversed-phase chromatography and different chromatographic scales (conventional HPLC, UHPLC and nanoLC). The data processing and the metabolite differential analysis were carried out using publically available (XCMS), proprietary (Mass Profiler Professional) and in-house software (NIST pipeline). RESULTS: Repeatability and intermediate precision showed that the non-targeted SRM 1950 profiling was highly reproducible when working on the same platform (relative standard deviation (RSD) <2%); however, substantial differences were found in the LC/MS patterns originating on different platforms or even using different chromatographic scales (conventional HPLC, UHPLC and nanoLC) on the same platform. A substantial degree of overlap (common molecular features) was also found. A procedure to generate consistent chemical signatures using tandem mass spectral libraries of recurrent spectra is proposed. CONLUSIONS: Different platforms rendered significantly different metabolite profiles, but the results were highly reproducible when working within one platform. Tandem mass spectral libraries of recurrent spectra are proposed to evaluate the degree of transferability of chemical signatures generated on different platforms. Chemical signatures based on our procedure are most likely cross-platform transferable. Published in 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
RATIONALE: The metabolite profiling of a NIST plasma Standard Reference Material (SRM 1950) on different liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) platforms showed significant differences. Although these findings suggest caution when interpreting metabolomics results, the degree of overlap of both profiles allowed us to use tandem mass spectral libraries of recurrent spectra to evaluate to what extent these results are transferable across platforms and to develop cross-platform chemical signatures. METHODS: Non-targeted global metabolite profiles of SRM 1950 were obtained on different LC/MS platforms using reversed-phase chromatography and different chromatographic scales (conventional HPLC, UHPLC and nanoLC). The data processing and the metabolite differential analysis were carried out using publically available (XCMS), proprietary (Mass Profiler Professional) and in-house software (NIST pipeline). RESULTS: Repeatability and intermediate precision showed that the non-targeted SRM 1950 profiling was highly reproducible when working on the same platform (relative standard deviation (RSD) <2%); however, substantial differences were found in the LC/MS patterns originating on different platforms or even using different chromatographic scales (conventional HPLC, UHPLC and nanoLC) on the same platform. A substantial degree of overlap (common molecular features) was also found. A procedure to generate consistent chemical signatures using tandem mass spectral libraries of recurrent spectra is proposed. CONLUSIONS: Different platforms rendered significantly different metabolite profiles, but the results were highly reproducible when working within one platform. Tandem mass spectral libraries of recurrent spectra are proposed to evaluate the degree of transferability of chemical signatures generated on different platforms. Chemical signatures based on our procedure are most likely cross-platform transferable. Published in 2016. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Arun Sreekumar; Laila M Poisson; Thekkelnaycke M Rajendiran; Amjad P Khan; Qi Cao; Jindan Yu; Bharathi Laxman; Rohit Mehra; Robert J Lonigro; Yong Li; Mukesh K Nyati; Aarif Ahsan; Shanker Kalyana-Sundaram; Bo Han; Xuhong Cao; Jaeman Byun; Gilbert S Omenn; Debashis Ghosh; Subramaniam Pennathur; Danny C Alexander; Alvin Berger; Jeffrey R Shuster; John T Wei; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Christopher Beecher; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Nature Date: 2009-02-12 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Olaf Beckonert; Hector C Keun; Timothy M D Ebbels; Jacob Bundy; Elaine Holmes; John C Lindon; Jeremy K Nicholson Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2007 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Karen W Phinney; Guillaume Ballihaut; Mary Bedner; Brandi S Benford; Johanna E Camara; Steven J Christopher; W Clay Davis; Nathan G Dodder; Gauthier Eppe; Brian E Lang; Stephen E Long; Mark S Lowenthal; Elizabeth A McGaw; Karen E Murphy; Bryant C Nelson; Jocelyn L Prendergast; Jessica L Reiner; Catherine A Rimmer; Lane C Sander; Michele M Schantz; Katherine E Sharpless; Lorna T Sniegoski; Susan S-C Tai; Jeanice B Thomas; Thomas W Vetter; Michael J Welch; Stephen A Wise; Laura J Wood; William F Guthrie; Charles R Hagwood; Stefan D Leigh; James H Yen; Nien-Fan Zhang; Madhu Chaudhary-Webb; Huiping Chen; Zia Fazili; Donna J LaVoie; Leslie F McCoy; Shahzad S Momin; Neelima Paladugula; Elizabeth C Pendergrast; Christine M Pfeiffer; Carissa D Powers; Daniel Rabinowitz; Michael E Rybak; Rosemary L Schleicher; Bridgette M H Toombs; Mary Xu; Mindy Zhang; Arthur L Castle Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Xinjian Yan; Sanford P Markey; Ramesh Marupaka; Qian Dong; Brian T Cooper; Yuri A Mirokhin; William E Wallace; Stephen E Stein Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Amelia Palermo; Tao Huan; Duane Rinehart; Markus M Rinschen; Shuzhao Li; Valerie B O'Donnell; Eoin Fahy; Jingchuan Xue; Shankar Subramaniam; H Paul Benton; Gary Siuzdak Journal: Anal Sci Adv Date: 2020-06-13
Authors: Charles M Nichols; James N Dodds; Bailey S Rose; Jaqueline A Picache; Caleb B Morris; Simona G Codreanu; Jody C May; Stacy D Sherrod; John A McLean Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Daniel W Bearden; David A Sheen; Yamil Simón-Manso; Bruce A Benner; Werickson F C Rocha; Niksa Blonder; Katrice A Lippa; Richard D Beger; Laura K Schnackenberg; Jinchun Sun; Khyati Y Mehta; Amrita K Cheema; Haiwei Gu; Ramesh Marupaka; G A Nagana Gowda; Daniel Raftery Journal: Metabolites Date: 2019-11-07
Authors: John A Bowden; Alan Heckert; Candice Z Ulmer; Christina M Jones; Jeremy P Koelmel; Laila Abdullah; Linda Ahonen; Yazen Alnouti; Aaron M Armando; John M Asara; Takeshi Bamba; John R Barr; Jonas Bergquist; Christoph H Borchers; Joost Brandsma; Susanne B Breitkopf; Tomas Cajka; Amaury Cazenave-Gassiot; Antonio Checa; Michelle A Cinel; Romain A Colas; Serge Cremers; Edward A Dennis; James E Evans; Alexander Fauland; Oliver Fiehn; Michael S Gardner; Timothy J Garrett; Katherine H Gotlinger; Jun Han; Yingying Huang; Aveline Huipeng Neo; Tuulia Hyötyläinen; Yoshihiro Izumi; Hongfeng Jiang; Houli Jiang; Jiang Jiang; Maureen Kachman; Reiko Kiyonami; Kristaps Klavins; Christian Klose; Harald C Köfeler; Johan Kolmert; Therese Koal; Grielof Koster; Zsuzsanna Kuklenyik; Irwin J Kurland; Michael Leadley; Karen Lin; Krishna Rao Maddipati; Danielle McDougall; Peter J Meikle; Natalie A Mellett; Cian Monnin; M Arthur Moseley; Renu Nandakumar; Matej Oresic; Rainey Patterson; David Peake; Jason S Pierce; Martin Post; Anthony D Postle; Rebecca Pugh; Yunping Qiu; Oswald Quehenberger; Parsram Ramrup; Jon Rees; Barbara Rembiesa; Denis Reynaud; Mary R Roth; Susanne Sales; Kai Schuhmann; Michal Laniado Schwartzman; Charles N Serhan; Andrej Shevchenko; Stephen E Somerville; Lisa St John-Williams; Michal A Surma; Hiroaki Takeda; Rhishikesh Thakare; J Will Thompson; Federico Torta; Alexander Triebl; Martin Trötzmüller; S J Kumari Ubhayasekera; Dajana Vuckovic; Jacquelyn M Weir; Ruth Welti; Markus R Wenk; Craig E Wheelock; Libin Yao; Min Yuan; Xueqing Heather Zhao; Senlin Zhou Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 5.922