Literature DB >> 26837671

Comparison of a 32-channel head coil and a 2-channel surface coil for MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint at 3.0 T.

Andrei Manoliu1,2, Georg Spinner2, Michael Wyss2, Lukas Filli1, Stefan Erni3, Dominik A Ettlin3, Erika J Ulbrich1, Felix P Kuhn1, Luigi M Gallo3, Gustav Andreisek1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively and qualitatively compare MRI of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) using a standard TMJ surface coil and a head coil at 3.0 T.
METHODS: 22 asymptomatic volunteers were MR imaged using a 2-channel surface coil (standard TMJ coil) and a 32-channel head coil at 3.0 T (Philips Ingenia; Philips Healthcare, Netherlands). Imaging protocol consisted of an oblique sagittal proton density weighted turbo spin echo sequence (repetition time/echo time, 2700/26 ms). For quantitative assessment, a spherical phantom was imaged using the same sequence including a noise scan and a B1+ scan. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) maps and B1+ maps were calculated on a voxelwise basis. For qualitative evaluation, all volunteers underwent MRI of both TMJs with the jaw in the closed position. Two independent blinded readers assessed accuracy of TMJ anatomical representation and overall image quality on a 5-point scale. Quantitative and qualitative measurements were compared between coils using t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively.
RESULTS: Quantitative analysis showed similar B1+ and significantly higher SNR for the head coil than the TMJ surface coil. Qualitative analysis showed significantly better visibility and delineation of clinically relevant anatomical structures of the TMJ, including the articular disc, bilaminar zone and lateral pterygoid muscle. Furthermore, better overall image quality was observed for the head coil than for the TMJ surface coil.
CONCLUSIONS: A 32-channel head coil is preferable to a standard 2-channel TMJ surface coil when imaging the TMJ at 3.0 T, because it yields higher SNR, thus increasing accuracy of the anatomical representation of the TMJ.

Keywords:  joints; magnetic resonance imaging; signal-to-noise ratio; temporomandibular joint; temporomandibular joint disc

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26837671      PMCID: PMC4846178          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20150420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  23 in total

1.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  The evaluation of temporomandibular joint disc position in TMJ disorders using MRI.

Authors:  M Oğütcen-Toller; N Taşkaya-Yilmaz; F Yilmaz
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  The NMR phased array.

Authors:  P B Roemer; W A Edelstein; C E Hayes; S P Souza; O M Mueller
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Health care utilization and cost among health maintenance organization members with temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  B A White; L A Williams; J R Leben
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  2001

5.  Actual flip-angle imaging in the pulsed steady state: a method for rapid three-dimensional mapping of the transmitted radiofrequency field.

Authors:  Vasily L Yarnykh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla in volunteers.

Authors:  Christoph Stehling; Volker Vieth; Rainald Bachmann; Isabelle Nassenstein; Harald Kugel; Hendrik Kooijman; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Management of temporomandibular disorders: concepts and controversies.

Authors:  C McNeill
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  The etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of TMJ dysfunction-pain syndrome. Part I: Etiology.

Authors:  L A Weinberg
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Diagnosis of temporomandibular dysfunction syndrome--image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Martina Schmid-Schwap; Wolfgang Drahanowsky; Margit Bristela; Michael Kundi; Eva Piehslinger; Soraya Robinson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  4 in total

1.  MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparison between acquisitions at 7.0 T using dielectric pads and 3.0 T.

Authors:  Felix P Kuhn; Georg Spinner; Filippo Del Grande; Michael Wyss; Marco Piccirelli; Stefan Erni; Pascal Pfister; Michael Ho; Bert-Ram Sah; Lukas Filli; Dominik A Ettlin; Luigi M Gallo; Gustav Andreisek; Andrei Manoliu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Intra- and inter-examination reproducibility of T2 mapping for temporomandibular joint assessment at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Pongsapak Wongratwanich; Toshikazu Nagasaki; Kiichi Shimabukuro; Masaru Konishi; Masahiko Ohtsuka; Yoshikazu Suei; Takashi Nakamoto; Yuji Akiyama; Kazuo Awai; Naoya Kakimoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Selection and application of coils in temporomandibular joint MRI.

Authors:  Qi Sun; Min-Jun Dong; Xiao-Feng Tao; Meng-da Jiang; Chi Yang
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  Interdisciplinary Approach to the Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis-Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Marcin Derwich; Maria Mitus-Kenig; Elzbieta Pawlowska
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 2.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.