Literature DB >> 19137306

Diagnosis of temporomandibular dysfunction syndrome--image quality at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging.

Martina Schmid-Schwap1, Wolfgang Drahanowsky, Margit Bristela, Michael Kundi, Eva Piehslinger, Soraya Robinson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in expert ratings of quality of magnetic resonance images (MRI) of the temporomandibular joint in 24 patients with suspected anterior disc displacement examined in randomized order at 1.5 and 3.0 T. Parasagittal (closed and opened mouth) and paracoronal sections were performed with a surface coil. Two experienced examiners blinded to patient status and type of MRI diagnosed the images according to position of condyle, position and changes in the signal, and disc shape. In addition, perceptibility of position and disc shape were assessed. A highly significant difference in the perceptibility of disc shape (P < 0.001) and position (P < 0.001) was obtained. With comparable examination sequences and identical resolution, the 3.0 T MRI of the temporomandibular joint increases the perceptibility of joint structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19137306     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1264-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  [Function damage of masticatory organ. Retrospective study of 1,778 patients in a West German clinic].

Authors:  G Diedrichs; R Bockholt
Journal:  ZWR       Date:  1990-02

2.  Correlation between disk morphology on MRI and time curves using electronic axiography.

Authors:  Martina Schmid-Schwap; Johann Gerold Briedl; Soraya Robinson; Eva Piehslinger
Journal:  Cranio       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.020

3.  MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparison of images of autopsy specimens made at 0.3 T and 1.5 T with anatomic cryosections.

Authors:  L G Hansson; P L Westesson; R W Katzberg; R H Tallents; K Kurita; S Holtås; S A Svensson; L Eriksson; C C Johansen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Clinical diagnoses and MRI findings in patients with TMD pain.

Authors:  N Limchaichana; H Nilsson; E C Ekberg; M Nilner; A Petersson
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.837

5.  Normal and abnormal temporomandibular joint disc and posterior attachment as depicted by magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Richard W Katzberg; Ross H Tallents
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  [T2 relaxation time in patellar cartilage--global and regional reproducibility at 1.5 tesla and 3 tesla].

Authors:  C Glaser; A Horng; T Mendlik; S Weckbach; R-T Hoffmann; S Wagner; J G Raya; W Horger; M Reiser
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2007-01-29

7.  MR imaging of cartilage in cadaveric wrists: comparison between imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T and gross pathologic inspection.

Authors:  Nadja Saupe; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Marius R Schmid; Thomas Schertler; Mirjana Manestar; Dominik Weishaupt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  A critical evaluation of orthopedic interocclusal appliance therapy: effectiveness for specific symptoms.

Authors:  G T Clark
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  Is clinical assessment valid for the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disk displacement?

Authors:  F Tognini; D Manfredini; G Montagnani; M Bosco
Journal:  Minerva Stomatol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

10.  High-resolution MRI of the wrist and finger joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Gero Wieners; Jacqueline Detert; Florian Streitparth; Maciej Pech; Frank Fischbach; Gerd Burmester; Jens Ricke; Marina Backhaus; Harald Bruhn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 7.034

View more
  9 in total

1.  Quantitative and qualitative comparison of MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint at 1.5 and 3.0 T using an optimized high-resolution protocol.

Authors:  Andrei Manoliu; Georg Spinner; Michael Wyss; Stefan Erni; Dominik A Ettlin; Daniel Nanz; Erika J Ulbrich; Luigi M Gallo; Gustav Andreisek
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Comparison of a 32-channel head coil and a 2-channel surface coil for MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Andrei Manoliu; Georg Spinner; Michael Wyss; Lukas Filli; Stefan Erni; Dominik A Ettlin; Erika J Ulbrich; Felix P Kuhn; Luigi M Gallo; Gustav Andreisek
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  MR imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparison between acquisitions at 7.0 T using dielectric pads and 3.0 T.

Authors:  Felix P Kuhn; Georg Spinner; Filippo Del Grande; Michael Wyss; Marco Piccirelli; Stefan Erni; Pascal Pfister; Michael Ho; Bert-Ram Sah; Lukas Filli; Dominik A Ettlin; Luigi M Gallo; Gustav Andreisek; Andrei Manoliu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Comparing proton density and turbo spin echo T2 weighted static sequences with dynamic half-Fourier single-shot TSE pulse sequence at 3.0 T in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders: a prospective study.

Authors:  M Cassetta; F Barchetti; N Pranno; M Marini
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Intra- and inter-examination reproducibility of T2 mapping for temporomandibular joint assessment at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Pongsapak Wongratwanich; Toshikazu Nagasaki; Kiichi Shimabukuro; Masaru Konishi; Masahiko Ohtsuka; Yoshikazu Suei; Takashi Nakamoto; Yuji Akiyama; Kazuo Awai; Naoya Kakimoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Biochemical analysis of the articular disc of the temporomandibular joint with magnetic resonance T2 mapping: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Martina Schmid-Schwap; Margit Bristela; Elisabeth Pittschieler; Astrid Skolka; Pavol Szomolanyi; Michael Weber; Eva Piehslinger; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of temporomandibular joint with anterior disk dislocation without reposition - long-term results.

Authors:  M Bristela; M Schmid-Schwap; J Eder; G Reichenberg; M Kundi; E Piehslinger; S Robinson
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Changes in temporomandibular joint anatomy, changes in condylar translation, and their relationship with disc displacement: magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Luciane Marie Bedran; Alair Augusto Sarmet Moreira Damas Dos Santos
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

9.  Selection and application of coils in temporomandibular joint MRI.

Authors:  Qi Sun; Min-Jun Dong; Xiao-Feng Tao; Meng-da Jiang; Chi Yang
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.419

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.