Michael P Cary1, Wei Pan2, Richard Sloane3, Janet Prvu Bettger2, Helen Hoenig4, Elizabeth I Merwin2, Ruth A Anderson2. 1. Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC. Electronic address: michael.cary@duke.edu. 2. Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC. 3. Center for the Study of Aging, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC. 4. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Service, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC; Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine contextual (facility and community) and individual factors associated with self-care and mobility outcomes among Medicare hip fracture patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 3 linked data files: Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument, Provider of Services, and Area Health Resources. Multilevel modeling was used to examine the effects of contextual and individual factors on self-care and mobility outcomes. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs). PARTICIPANTS: Medicare hip fracture patients (N=35,264; mean age, 81y) treated in IRFs (N=1072) in 2012. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-care (eating, grooming, bathing, upper and lower body dressing, toileting) and mobility (walk/wheelchair, stairs) at discharge. RESULTS: Mean ± SD self-care and mobility scores at admission were 3.17±.87 and 1.24±.51, respectively; mean ± SD self-care and mobility scores at discharge were 5.03±1.09 and 3.31±1.54, respectively. Individual and contextual levels explained 44.4% and 21.6% of the variance in self-care at discharge, respectively, and 19.5% and 1.9% of the variance in mobility at discharge, respectively. At the individual level, age, race/ethnicity, cognitive and motor FIM scores at admission, and tier comorbidities explained variance in self-care and mobility; sex and length of stay explained variance only in self-care. At the contextual level, facilities' case mix (mean patient age, percent non-Hispanic white, mean self-care score at admission) and structural characteristics (rural location, freestanding, for-profit ownership) explained variance only in self-care; facilities' case mix (mean patient age, percent non-Hispanic white, percent living with social support, mean mobility score at admission) explained variance in mobility. Community variables were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Individual and facility factors were significant predictors of discharge self-care and mobility among Medicare hip fracture patients in IRFs. The findings may improve quality of IRF services to hip fracture patients and inform risk adjustment methods.
OBJECTIVE: To examine contextual (facility and community) and individual factors associated with self-care and mobility outcomes among Medicare hip fracturepatients receiving inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 3 linked data files: Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument, Provider of Services, and Area Health Resources. Multilevel modeling was used to examine the effects of contextual and individual factors on self-care and mobility outcomes. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs). PARTICIPANTS: Medicare hip fracturepatients (N=35,264; mean age, 81y) treated in IRFs (N=1072) in 2012. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-care (eating, grooming, bathing, upper and lower body dressing, toileting) and mobility (walk/wheelchair, stairs) at discharge. RESULTS: Mean ± SD self-care and mobility scores at admission were 3.17±.87 and 1.24±.51, respectively; mean ± SD self-care and mobility scores at discharge were 5.03±1.09 and 3.31±1.54, respectively. Individual and contextual levels explained 44.4% and 21.6% of the variance in self-care at discharge, respectively, and 19.5% and 1.9% of the variance in mobility at discharge, respectively. At the individual level, age, race/ethnicity, cognitive and motor FIM scores at admission, and tier comorbidities explained variance in self-care and mobility; sex and length of stay explained variance only in self-care. At the contextual level, facilities' case mix (mean patient age, percent non-Hispanic white, mean self-care score at admission) and structural characteristics (rural location, freestanding, for-profit ownership) explained variance only in self-care; facilities' case mix (mean patient age, percent non-Hispanic white, percent living with social support, mean mobility score at admission) explained variance in mobility. Community variables were nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Individual and facility factors were significant predictors of discharge self-care and mobility among Medicare hip fracturepatients in IRFs. The findings may improve quality of IRF services to hip fracturepatients and inform risk adjustment methods.
Authors: J Magaziner; W Hawkes; J R Hebel; S I Zimmerman; K M Fox; M Dolan; G Felsenthal; J Kenzora Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Susan Magasi; Alex Wong; David B Gray; Joy Hammel; Carolyn Baum; Chia-Chiang Wang; Allen W Heinemann Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Michael C Munin; Karen Seligman; Mary Amanda Dew; Tanya Quear; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Gary Gruen; Charles F Reynolds; Eric J Lenze Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Pamela M Smith; Sandra B Illig; Richard T Linn; Vera A Gonzales; Glenn V Ostir; Carl V Granger Journal: Med Care Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: L Beaupre; B Sobolev; P Guy; J D Kim; L Kuramoto; K J Sheehan; J M Sutherland; E Harvey; S N Morin Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Claudia Schulz; Gisela Büchele; Raphael Simon Peter; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Patrick Roigk; Kilian Rapp; Katrin Christiane Reber; Hans-Helmut König Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 3.240