Literature DB >> 30937483

Discharge destination following hip fracture in Canada among previously community-dwelling older adults, 2004-2012: database study.

L Beaupre1, B Sobolev2, P Guy3, J D Kim2, L Kuramoto4, K J Sheehan5, J M Sutherland3, E Harvey6, S N Morin6.   

Abstract

Little is known about post-acute care following hip fracture surgery. We investigated discharge destinations from surgical hospitals for nine Canadian provinces. We identified significant heterogeneity in discharge patterns across provinces suggesting different post-acute recovery pathways. Further work is required to determine the impact on patient outcomes and health system costs.
INTRODUCTION: To examine discharge destinations by provinces in Canada, adjusting for patient, injury, and care characteristics.
METHODS: We analyzed population-based hospital discharge abstracts from a national administrative database for community-dwelling patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between 2004 and 2012 in Canada. Discharge destination was categorized as rehabilitation, home, acute care, and continuing care. Multinomial logistic regression modeling compared proportions of discharge to rehabilitation, acute care, and continuing care versus home between each province and Ontario. Adjusted risk differences and risk ratios were estimated.
RESULTS: Of 111,952 previously community-dwelling patients aged 65 years or older, 22.5% were discharged to rehabilitation, 31.6% to home, 27.0% to acute care, and 18.2% to continuing care, with significant variation across provinces (p < 0.001). The proportion of discharge to rehabilitation ranged from 2.4% in British Columbia to 41.0% in Ontario while the proportion discharged home ranged from 20.3% in Prince Edward Island to 52.2% in British Columbia. The proportion of discharge to acute care ranged from 15.2% in Ontario to 58.8% in Saskatchewan while the proportion discharged to continuing care ranged from 9.3% in Manitoba and Prince Edward Island to 22.9% in New Brunswick. Adjusting for hospital type changed the direction of the provincial effect on discharge to continuing care in two provinces, but statistical significance remained consistent with the primary analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Discharge destination from the surgical hospital after hip fracture is highly variable across nine Canadian provinces. Further work is required to determine the impact of this heterogeneity on patient outcomes and health system costs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discharge destination; Health services research; Hip fracture; Variation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30937483     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-04943-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  44 in total

Review 1.  Health care quality, geographic variations, and the challenge of supply-sensitive care.

Authors:  Elliott S Fisher; John E Wennberg
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.416

2.  Bundles: an opportunity to align incentives for continuing care in Canada?

Authors:  Jason M Sutherland; Erik Hellsten; Kevin Yu
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  O Johnell; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Medicare spending and outcomes after postacute care for stroke and hip fracture.

Authors:  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin; Carrie Hoverman Colla; Partha Deb; Neeraj Sood; José J Escarce
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Association of hospital spending intensity with mortality and readmission rates in Ontario hospitals.

Authors:  Therese A Stukel; Elliott S Fisher; David A Alter; Astrid Guttmann; Dennis T Ko; Kinwah Fung; Walter P Wodchis; Nancy N Baxter; Craig C Earle; Douglas S Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Time to surgery after hip fracture across Canada by timing of admission.

Authors:  K J Sheehan; C Filliter; B Sobolev; A R Levy; P Guy; L Kuramoto; J D Kim; M Dunbar; S N Morin; J M Sutherland; S Jaglal; E Harvey; L Beaupre; A Chudyk
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Time trends in hospital stay after hip fracture in Canada, 2004-2012: database study.

Authors:  Boris Sobolev; Pierre Guy; Katie Jane Sheehan; Lisa Kuramoto; Eric Bohm; Lauren Beaupre; Jason M Sutherland; Michael Dunbar; Donald Griesdale; Suzanne N Morin; Edward Harvey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States.

Authors:  Carmen A Brauer; Marcelo Coca-Perraillon; David M Cutler; Allison B Rosen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  New pricing approaches for bundled payments: Leveraging clinical standards and regional variations to target avoidable utilization.

Authors:  Erik Hellsten; Scally Chu; R Trafford Crump; Kevin Yu; Jason M Sutherland
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 10.  Pre-operative indicators for mortality following hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby Smith; Kelum Pelpola; Martin Ball; Alice Ong; Phyo Kyaw Myint
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 10.668

View more
  4 in total

1.  Hip fractures in Spain: are we on the right track? Statistically significant differences in hip fracture management between Autonomous Communities in Spain.

Authors:  Pablo Castillón; Jorge H Nuñez; Fatima Mori-Gamarra; Cristina Ojeda-Thies; Pilar Sáez-López; Jordi Salvador; Francesc Anglés; Juan Ignacio González-Montalvo
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Prognosis and institutionalization of frail community-dwelling older patients following a proximal femoral fracture: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  S A I Loggers; T M P Nijdam; E C Folbert; J H H Hegeman; D Van der Velde; M H J Verhofstad; E M M Van Lieshout; P Joosse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 5.071

3.  Time-to-Incision for Hip Fractures in a Canadian Level-1 Trauma Centre: Are We Respecting the Guidelines?

Authors:  Antoine Denis; Julien Montreuil; Rudolf Reindl; Gregory K Berry; Edward J Harvey; Mitchell Bernstein
Journal:  Can Geriatr J       Date:  2022-03-02

4.  Does rehabilitation setting influence risk of institutionalization? A register-based study of hip fracture patients in Oslo, Norway.

Authors:  Rina Moe Fosse; Eliva Atieno Ambugo; Tron Anders Moger; Terje P Hagen; Trond Tjerbo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.