Michael P Cary1, Marianne Baernholdt2, Ruth A Anderson3, Elizabeth I Merwin3. 1. Duke University, School of Nursing, Durham, NC. Electronic address: michael.cary@duke.edu. 2. Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Nursing, Richmond, VA. 3. Duke University, School of Nursing, Durham, NC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of facility and aggregate patient characteristics of inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) on performance-based rehabilitation outcomes in a national sample of IRFs treating Medicare beneficiaries with hip fracture. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis. SETTING: U.S. Medicare-certified IRFs (N=983). PARTICIPANTS: Data included patient records of Medicare beneficiaries (N=34,364) admitted in 2009 for rehabilitation after hip fracture. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance-based outcomes included mean motor function on discharge, mean motor change (mean motor score on discharge minus mean motor score on admission), and percentage discharged to the community. RESULTS: Higher mean motor function on discharge was explained by aggregate characteristics of patients with hip fracture (lower age [P=.009], lower percentage of blacks [P<.001] and Hispanics [P<.001], higher percentage of women [P=.030], higher motor function on admission [P<.001], longer length of stay [P<.001]) and facility characteristics (freestanding [P<.001], rural [P<.001], for profit [P=.048], smaller IRFs [P=.014]). The findings were similar for motor change, but motor change was also associated with lower mean cognitive function on admission (P=.008). Higher percentage discharged to the community was associated with aggregate patient characteristics (lower age [P<.001], lower percentage of Hispanics [P=.009], higher percentage of patients living with others [P<.001], higher motor function on admission [P<.001]). No facility characteristics were associated with the percentage discharged to the community. CONCLUSIONS: Performance-based measurement offers health policymakers, administrators, clinicians, and consumers a major opportunity for securing health system improvement by benchmarking or comparing their outcomes with those of other similar facilities. These results might serve as the basis for benchmarking and quality-based reimbursement to IRFs for 1 impairment group: hip fracture.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of facility and aggregate patient characteristics of inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) on performance-based rehabilitation outcomes in a national sample of IRFs treating Medicare beneficiaries with hip fracture. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis. SETTING: U.S. Medicare-certified IRFs (N=983). PARTICIPANTS: Data included patient records of Medicare beneficiaries (N=34,364) admitted in 2009 for rehabilitation after hip fracture. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance-based outcomes included mean motor function on discharge, mean motor change (mean motor score on discharge minus mean motor score on admission), and percentage discharged to the community. RESULTS: Higher mean motor function on discharge was explained by aggregate characteristics of patients with hip fracture (lower age [P=.009], lower percentage of blacks [P<.001] and Hispanics [P<.001], higher percentage of women [P=.030], higher motor function on admission [P<.001], longer length of stay [P<.001]) and facility characteristics (freestanding [P<.001], rural [P<.001], for profit [P=.048], smaller IRFs [P=.014]). The findings were similar for motor change, but motor change was also associated with lower mean cognitive function on admission (P=.008). Higher percentage discharged to the community was associated with aggregate patient characteristics (lower age [P<.001], lower percentage of Hispanics [P=.009], higher percentage of patients living with others [P<.001], higher motor function on admission [P<.001]). No facility characteristics were associated with the percentage discharged to the community. CONCLUSIONS: Performance-based measurement offers health policymakers, administrators, clinicians, and consumers a major opportunity for securing health system improvement by benchmarking or comparing their outcomes with those of other similar facilities. These results might serve as the basis for benchmarking and quality-based reimbursement to IRFs for 1 impairment group: hip fracture.
Authors: Lawrence P Casalino; Arthur Elster; Andy Eisenberg; Evelyn Lewis; John Montgomery; Diana Ramos Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2007-04-10 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Michael P Cary; Wei Pan; Richard Sloane; Janet Prvu Bettger; Helen Hoenig; Elizabeth I Merwin; Ruth A Anderson Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Kristen B Pitzul; Sarah E P Munce; Laure Perrier; Lauren Beaupre; Suzanne N Morin; Rhona McGlasson; Susan B Jaglal Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Elizabeth Golembiewski; Katie S Allen; Amber M Blackmon; Rachel J Hinrichs; Joshua R Vest Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Date: 2019-10-07