OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether FIM instrument motor outcomes differ between hip fracture survivors undergoing rehabilitation in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). DESIGN: Inception cohort with follow-up to 12 weeks after hospital discharge. SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary care hospital, IRFs, and SNFs. PARTICIPANTS: All hip fracture patients prospectively admitted between March 1, 2002, and June 30, 2003, were eligible if they were 60 years or older and had surgical stabilization of the fracture. INTERVENTIONS: Posthip fracture rehabilitation delivered at either IRFs or SNFs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: FIM motor score obtained postoperatively and at 2 and 12 weeks posthospital discharge. RESULTS: IRF patients stayed an average of 12.8 days, whereas SNF patients averaged 36.2 days. Rehabilitation participation scores were obtained during therapy sessions and did not differ between groups. A repeated-measures analysis of covariance found a significant group by time interaction (F 2,68 =23.75, P <.001), which indicates that patients in an IRF had significantly higher FIM motor scores than those in an SNF across time. Logistic regression showed that IRF subjects were more likely to reach 95% of their prefracture FIM motor by week 12 than were SNF patients. A significantly higher percentage of IRF patients were discharged home after rehabilitation compared with SNF patients. CONCLUSIONS: IRF patients had superior 12-week functional outcomes, as measured by the FIM motor score, compared with those treated in an SNF. The improved outcomes occurred during a significantly shorter rehabilitation length of stay and remained even when statistically controlling for baseline differences between groups. These data suggest that hip fracture survivors should not be excluded from receiving inpatient rehabilitation services. Randomized clinical trials are needed to understand more fully differences between rehabilitation treatment settings.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether FIM instrument motor outcomes differ between hip fracture survivors undergoing rehabilitation in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). DESIGN: Inception cohort with follow-up to 12 weeks after hospital discharge. SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary care hospital, IRFs, and SNFs. PARTICIPANTS: All hip fracturepatients prospectively admitted between March 1, 2002, and June 30, 2003, were eligible if they were 60 years or older and had surgical stabilization of the fracture. INTERVENTIONS: Posthip fracture rehabilitation delivered at either IRFs or SNFs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: FIM motor score obtained postoperatively and at 2 and 12 weeks posthospital discharge. RESULTS:IRFpatients stayed an average of 12.8 days, whereas SNF patients averaged 36.2 days. Rehabilitation participation scores were obtained during therapy sessions and did not differ between groups. A repeated-measures analysis of covariance found a significant group by time interaction (F 2,68 =23.75, P <.001), which indicates that patients in an IRF had significantly higher FIM motor scores than those in an SNF across time. Logistic regression showed that IRF subjects were more likely to reach 95% of their prefracture FIM motor by week 12 than were SNF patients. A significantly higher percentage of IRFpatients were discharged home after rehabilitation compared with SNF patients. CONCLUSIONS:IRFpatients had superior 12-week functional outcomes, as measured by the FIM motor score, compared with those treated in an SNF. The improved outcomes occurred during a significantly shorter rehabilitation length of stay and remained even when statistically controlling for baseline differences between groups. These data suggest that hip fracture survivors should not be excluded from receiving inpatient rehabilitation services. Randomized clinical trials are needed to understand more fully differences between rehabilitation treatment settings.
Authors: Danielle S Abraham; Erik Barr; Glenn V Ostir; J Richard Hebel; Justine Golden; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Jack M Guralnik; Marc C Hochberg; Denise L Orwig; Barbara Resnick; Jay S Magaziner Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Mary W Hildebrand; Helen H Host; Ellen F Binder; Brian Carpenter; Kenneth E Freedland; Nancy Morrow-Howell; Carolyn M Baum; Peter Doré; Eric J Lenze Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Eric J Lenze; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Mary Amanda Dew; Meryl A Butters; Joan C Rogers; Amy Begley; Charles F Reynolds; Michael C Munin Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Jaime B Talkowski; Eric J Lenze; Michael C Munin; Chris Harrison; Jennifer S Brach Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.966